and kissinger is in paris. and al haig writes him and says, the russians are going to bat for us. and i'm looking at that. you know, we're talking about a situation in which 20,000 americans have died because it most americans honestly believed that it was important. and to you know, to convince the russians and the chinese that we were formidable nation and that they would be deterred from taking other actions. and i'm just using that one sentence. but it's not just one sentence. it's this whole event. it was very i could go on forever in 500 pages, but i saw reading that, reading that material and just looking at the exchanges that were going back and forth, you know, it was just extraordinary and really, did you know i was an antiwar person back then? you know, i still have good feelings about columbia 68 and so forth, but even as a friend, which i think is happening right as we sit here, but you know even as somebody that was the antiwar i actually felt like when was reading things that it was really shocking i was very startled by what i was seeing in the negotiations with th

to me, that's interesting of whole kissinger. you call it where we actually brought these 2 countries together. i thought you meant because, you know, we're so mean to them that eventually they found a friendship in, in each other. is that what you're mean? or do you mean something else? well, you know, going back to kissinger, remember the us strategically split china away from the ussr bought or strategic reasons. and they were successful in that. and for decades, the ussr and china fo, see, were not on speaking terms actually had to, you know, small border war and, and then what has happened in the blinking and vitamin ministration is they've essentially pushed china and russia together to be the best of all possible uh no, allies and companions to each other. it's extraordinary. it's the most foolish thing you could do if you were thinking just strategically. final question, apparently put and yesterday came out and said that he's willing to abide by an accord or a truce, or an agreement that is brokered by china. this is the

it was the latter who dealt with kissinger. confidential conversations.72, a draft agreement was developed to end the war and restore peace in vietnam. it provided for the withdrawal of us troops and allies from the south of vietnam and the transfer of the process of political settlement into the hands of the vietnamese themselves. but on november 7 , 1970, richard nixon again won the us presidential election, after which he immediately proposed changing the text of the agreement. network of b-52 strategic bombers, under public pressure and in the context of the growing gate scandal, washington was forced to make concessions. kissinger returned to the negotiating table, on january 27, 73 an agreement was signed in paris ending the war and restoring peace in vietnam. behind your back. not obvious, but the possibility becomes more real. you mentioned that negotiations during the vietnam war were impossible until some appropriate moment. what was that moment? 8 million tons of bombs, twice as many as were dropped by the allies during the second world war. th

it was the latter who had confidential conversations with kissinger.ber 1972, a draft agreement was developed to end the war and restore peace in vietnam. it provided for the withdrawal of us troops and allies from the south of vietnam and the transfer of the process of political settlement into the hands of the vietnamese themselves. but november 7th. nixon again wins the us presidential election, after which he immediately proposes changing the text of the agreement. according to washington, the conflict is resolved. should not be in the hands of the vietnamese themselves. moreover, north vietnam must recognize the existence of the south. having become familiar with the new requirements, the drv delegation left paris. on the night of december 18-19, 1972, already by order of nixon massive bombings of the cities of hanoi and haiphong, also known as christmas bombings, began. they lasted 12 days straight and were meant to be coercive. hanoi accepted the american conditions, but during this period , vietnamese pilots and soldiers shot down dozens of ene

in fact, the essence of what kissinger and nixon did in the early 70 is in the recognition of china was to keep these two apart. let me on your compare listen on the national security strategy. you know during trump and then in terms of the one released by biden, one challenge i'd make to you is i think some might say to you that in terms of the first one, that it was execute did in terms of defense the line that reagan had, you know, peace through strength, that our defense defenses were bolstered and also the fact of the kind of signals that were sent in terms of policies like the establishment of actually a kind of fought you will or forward deployment in europe because of concern of russian aggression that actually there were concrete, tangible actions that provided a deterrent. so they would challenge that. well, it may not have been well executed. some would say that it was executed in terms of actions, not not words. there were some was said, but actions. so there were some very helpful actions, including, as you suggest, building up nato, giving some defensive weapons to ukraine

kissinger, the russians started to move towards the middle east, and henry kissinger and his team believedlear level to death con 3 which had only been done once before, the cuban missile crisis and he did that without telling the president of the united states. >> martha: if that weren't jaw-dropping enough, fast forward to a situation room meeting with the next president, jimmy carter. a nugget which george uncovered after reading carter's diary. >> george: the strangest story in the book. >> martha: it happened in the spring of 1980, just weeks after the failed rescue of the american hostages held if iran. >> george: there was actually a program in the intelligence community during the 1970s and '80s called operation grill flame which used psychics and because they were so fascinated by this, they actually called a meeting in may so they could get a briefing on this parapsychology program. jimmy carter doesn't say a word, just takes out his note bad and writes one word on it and sends it across the desk. the word was hostages. can you do he was so desperate for anything that might help

in fact, the essence of what kissinger and nixon did in the early 70 is in the recognition of china wase on your compare listen on the nationalurity strategy. you know during trump and then 'd make tof the one released by you is i think some might say to you that in terms of the first one, that it was execute did in terms of defense the line that reagan had, you know, peace through strength, that our defens defenses were bolstered and also the fact oe signals the establishment of actually a kind fought you will or forward deoymeconcern of russian aggresn concrete, tangible actions that provided a deterrent. that. well, it may not have been well was executed in terms ofct not not words. there were some was said, but actions. so there were some very helpfulu suggest, building up nato, giving some defensive weapons to ukraine that the obama administration had refused to give the javelins. the javelins, which i mean, today seems pretty modest compared to what we've had to go give the ukraine. anw the problem that they ran into, paul, was that for ev forward, you know, having those that rota

whether it's romney or cheney or kissinger.t once you marry yourself to so much emotion over so much time and you put so much effortf into thifos you can't reverse te stance. it hurts too much and they can't change their mind and when they see somebody do that it burnsat them up that's what you are seeings wh with these implosion. >> you happens in political histories people tear eachh other's faces off for a year before the election then they break bread and they come reaktogether.th >> i think herin saying yesterd, that she supporting trump bureau are in the trump campaign and serious about the numbers in thr campaigns you want what she sad yesterday and you want to use it as well it's smart sense mron trump locked up the nominationsi since march 6tnch she got 18% ie arizon va 14% in florida and 17% in the commonwealth of pennsylvania. so her saying at the end of the day going to have to vote for f him becausore i don't want to ve for biden is good for trump. democrats are the same they will y i might have reservations about

kissinger returned to the negotiating table on january 27, 7 you have a long diplomatic career behind ask you about another conflict, vietnam, there were many attempts to start negotiations and for a long time were unsuccessful, we witnessed a similar situation, both sides also stood up and argued that negotiations impossible, but... then the right moment came and the dialogue began secretly in paris. henry kissenger then met with the vietnamese and secretly discussed the issue with the chinese. over time it began open process, structural difficulties similar to today arose because north vietnam was unwilling to negotiate with south vietnam, and south vietnam was unhappy with the united states speaking on its behalf. and, of course, the united states misinterpreted the preconditions for the conflict, believing that it was to blame for everything. 8 million tons of bombs, twice as much as were dropped by the allies during the second world war, was exactly the same amount of explosives that fell on the territory of vietnam, loos and cambodia during the entire vietnam conflict. the us ai

and yes, i remember, and the henry kissinger avery's that the communist china left calling me in the soviet union. and the that had the, the do as i had a very much is the suddenly many content. and now the and now the united states doing just opal's i policy and that, that's why your question, if or the police position of, or i so i wouldn't be, it would be not only that poses the position of russia, because the site is now practically supported by china, and by either on a more or less by, in the more or less by african countries. so the west, the challenge for the west then would be not only russia, but to the wart majority. it's not necessarily a matter of, for example, in the united states versus russian or the european block versus the east. so would it be safer to say that this is as an alternative to the collective less? yes. and not only alternative to the collective worst, but the pressure for changing the global architecture, global security architecture. because the collective west. yes, the on the big with the united states would not be the only the only for all of the,

it almost sounds like the kind of partnership that nixon and kissinger were able to prevent in the coldar. >> in the words of xi jinping, this is a relationship not seen in 100 years. those are his words, and the actions supported. >> north korea has supplied russia with short range ballistic missiles in addition to millions of artillery shells. are you concerned as a two-way street, that north korean missiles, which are not particularly good, get battle tested in ukraine by russia and therefore destabilize? >> absolutely. first of all, when you talk about authoritarian nations, no one ever does anything to help anyone else for the goodness of the other person. there is a quid pro quo that again, that is this no limits relationship that we should be concerned about. >> a u.s. official gave me this detail -- china has sent russia billions of dollars worth of machine tools that russia has likely use to build muscles. it almost sounds like the kind of partnership that nixon and kissinger were able to prevent in the cold war. >> in the words of xi jinping, this is a relationship not seen in

and the henry kissinger avery's that, that call me in the sy in the left call me in the soviet union. and the that i had with the do as a had a very much is the suddenly mary content and now the and now the united states doing just opal's i policy and that, that's why your question, if or the police position of rush, i wouldn't be it would be not only that because the position of russia, because the site is now practically supported by china and by either on a more or less by, in the more or less by african countries. so on the west, the challenge for the west then would be not only russia, but to the wart majority, it's not necessarily a matter of, for example, in the united states versus russian or the european block versus the east. so would it be safer to say that this is as an alternative to the collective lest yes, bend not the only alternative to the collective worst, but the pressure for changing the global architecture, global security architecture. because the collective west. yes. the on the big with the united states would to not to be the only the only bowl of the, of the

his advisor at the time was henry kissinger.lin, in apartments next to the armory. in fact, nixon's visit marked the beginning of the policy, as it was then said, of international détente tension. negotiations with brezhnev. went successfully, they lasted 4 days, every day they signed something, it was during that visit that the most important documents of the era were signed, start-1 and the popro treaty. and washington agreed not to build new launchers for intercontinental missiles in the next 5 years, and also to seriously limit their missile defense system, protecting no more than two areas in each country. unfortunately, in 2001, the united states unilaterally withdrew from the pro-missile treaty in order to create a national pro-system. taking a course towards dismantling the entire strategic arms control system and destroying the international security architecture. this is what this day in history was like. and now economic news alexander, those affected by the flood in the orenburg region, were provided with credit holi

you know that the americans have a plan called churchill's kissinger trap, that is, it is an american-british plan to upset the security balance in the asia-pacific , as far as the security model of cooperation between russia and china and friends and partners, well you know. we cooperate with russia and china in the security of a one-way belt and maneuvers in the field of international waterways, this creates an opportunity for us to consider a coalition. you know that mr. putin, the new minister of defense , and mr. shoigu, the secretary of the security council, are also present in today's trip. this shows that one of the main axes of the dialogue between the parties is in the military aspect of security and dealing with joint threats . china and russia are trying to reach a common understanding to create a military alliance and increase their military cooperation, and now they want to create a barrier against america and nato. well, you know that americans have many military bases in asia pacific , whether in south korea, japan, australia, and they have a joint security treaty with austral

this book , national security has various indicators, for example , basic goods, that a person like kissinger writes a book and says that a country cannot produce its own bread , it cannot be independent. it's true, even though it came from a nameless person, but it's true. what are our basic commodities? we were once told during the taghut period that we bring wheat, grains, etc. from outside. you can plant artichokes and cassava, and so on . this means that our share of global production is marginal. it was not right for our national security, so one of the weights of our national security is the issue of basic goods, and one of the issues is the energy issue of our country. we are an oil company, but we should not sell crude oil. in my opinion , we should not sell even a drop of crude oil. the best petrochemical products should be in iran. that is, if they say in the world, for example, where in the world is a good petrochemical product, they say there are three places, one of which is iran, if drilling is prohibited. how many large offshore drilling companies are there anywhere, say 5 ira

his advisor at the time was henry kissinger. the americans were settled right in the kremlin.re successful. they lasted 4 days , every day they signed something. it was during that visit that the most important documents were signed era - start-1 and the popro treaty. moscow and washington have agreed not to build new launchers for intercontinental missiles in the next 5 years. where are you from 11 b? no hello, am i from the eleventh b? we are also from the eleventh b, in the eleventh b? in the eleventh b. i only need one boy, here he is, i had to fake this way to watch this good film. why are you so lucky? i really liked it, beautiful actors, young, beautiful shooting, exciting, all this, all these emotions were there, it’s very it was cool. this was the first film that i was absolutely delighted with, the humor is good, i need to get to school 7:33, my nephew is there at night, but it’s not like that yet, wait, i’m hey, it was funny, yes, here’s the rating like this, very cool, if you have any questions, ask how you could even end up here, what kind of meeting, sometimes yo

americans, you know that the americans have a plan called the kissinger-churchill trap, that is, it isamerican-british plan to upset the security balance in the asia-pacific, as far as the security model of cooperation between russia and china and friends and partners, you know that now we are with russia and china regarding the security of one belt we cooperate with the ways and maneuvers in the field of international waterways. this creates an opportunity for us to reach a coalition . this shows that one of the main axes of the dialogue between the parties in the dimension of the system. security forces and dealing with common threats . my next question is exactly the same. after the developments of the last few years in the world, especially the war in ukraine and the crisis that america is doing for china in the taiwan incident, will china and russia come to an understanding? and they reached a common understanding to create a military coalition and increase their military cooperation, and now they want to create a barrier against america and nato. well, you know that the americans

nixon. years old vnukova and his wife with a large delegation, his adviser then was henry kissinger. kremlin in apartments next to the armory . in fact, nixon's visit marked the beginning of a policy of, as they said at the time, détente in international tension. negotiations with brezhnev were successful. they lasted 4 days, every day they signed something. it was during that visit that the most important documents of the era were signed - start-1 and the popro treaty. moscow. washington agreed not to build new launchers for the next 5 years installations for intercontinental missiles, and also seriously limit its missile defense systems, protecting no more than two areas in each country. unfortunately, in 2001, the united states unilaterally withdrew from the pro-missile treaty in order to create a national pro-system. taking a course towards dismantling the entire system of strategic arms control and destroying the international security architecture. this is how this day in history was, you have the opinion that time heals 512. why is it important to recognize genocide specifical

a person like kissinger writes a book and says that a country cannot produce its own bread, it cannotindependent. what is our basic principle ? they once told us during the taghut period that we bring wheat, corn and other things from outside. you can plant artichokes and cashews here, and so on. it means that our share of world production is marginal. well, for security. our national was not right , so our national security is one of the issues of basic goods, one of the issues is the energy issue of our country we are an oil company, but we should not sell crude oil. in my opinion, we should not sell even a drop of crude oil . the best petrochemical products should be in iran. that is, if they say, for example , where in the world is a good petrochemical product, they say there are three places, one of which is iran. if they want drilling, they should say. how many big offshore drilling companies are there anywhere? there are five jias, one is iranian, this is the one that means oil, well, it is a very important route, this is also a matter of another discussion, the driving force,

and the henry kissinger avery's that the communist china left calling me in the soviet union. and the that had with that has had a very much is the suddenly many content. and now the and now the united states doing just opal's i policy and that, that's why your question, if or the police position of, or i so i wouldn't be, it would be not only that because the position of russia, because the site is now practically supported by china, and by either on a more or less by, in the more or less by african countries. so, from the west, the challenge for the west then would be not only russia, but to the wart. majority of the following almost a week of unrest in new caledonia, paris declared a state of emergency in its overseas territory. that's as pro independence. demonstrators blocked the territories, the key roads. here's a breakdown of what prompted riots across the island. the, the 3 words of my circular, awesome speed. it is imperative, the republican or to be restored. the just saw, we feel oppressed, we are angry, everything is happening over a bit. and we a one dream. all w

do this, but again this will take years, let's again draw a parallel with vietnam when nixon and kissingerrth vietnam in paris , it took several years to reach an agreement, the following approach was adopted: escalation for the sake of de-escalation, that is , the americans began bombing vietnam, cambodia, in order to push the vietnamese leadership to a peace agreement, i don’t know if trump is ready to do something like this, will he be ready to increase the amount of aid to ukraine? and stabilize the situation on the battlefield, because so far the situation is such that it is russia that is attacking, in a situation when one of the parties has the initiative, it is usually not very willing to negotiate. you said a number of other very important things: the first thing you recalled was that nixon, when he came to the conclusion that in order to get out of the vietnam war, a war that he did not want, he inherited it from president johnson, but nixon came to the conclusion that he had to use more force, heavy bombing, against north vietnam to get out of this war, the result was a terrible

that directly contradicts the kissinger covenant.increasing its influence in the middle east. china's continued efforts to create multiple localized threats, known as gray zone aggression, are eroding american power in the far east. the goal is to trap america between two lose-lose options. if we ignore ukraine and focus on china in the middle east, then russia and iran will be able to undermine ours. alliances shift the geopolitical balance in your favor. if we focus our efforts on the ukrainian conflict, china and iran will be able to advance their own regional agendas. to avoid this, some argue that the united states must simultaneously confront our adversaries in all three theaters of war. however, we lack the military resources to implement such a strategy. even if we had the necessary capabilities, american public opinion is not yet sufficiently united and focused enough for such serious costly efforts, like... we are now seeing how the united states of america has driven itself into a series of traps, not just one trap, but a

like many of his predecessors at the state department, from henry kissinger, to madeline albright and i could go on some good ones. he's essentially paid to. i'm just going to say it, he's paid a lie and kill and start wards. much of it at the highest of large military contractor who he has worked for in the past and will likely work for him when this temporary dig that he has now at the white house is over. he'll be back there. they all do. of course, he won't get that $1000000.00 pair of shoes. if, while he's at the what else he goes against the status quote, which is why he doesn't and which is why he won't, you follow me. what that means is he lies and he is inconsistent positions on ukraine, and i'm cause a and on the south, tennessee, and other rod and a host of other global politics. they don't matter to him, right? they don't matter to him to do those things, even as the whole world calls him out. he does not care. you know why he does not care, because he knows that he will always be protected by congress. which is corrupt by military contractors who simply want him to start

the kissinger um, you know, madeline albright, i mean, well whoever gets in that position does exactly what this guy is doing. why is that? steve? part of the job, i guess their, their drive to make sure that they're promoting whatever agenda that they're racing . and even if it's, if it's nonsense, i think it's particularly ironic that she's leading the fight to pause. weapons is real because of the collateral damage in jobs. up but sending weapons to ukraine that are killing innocent men, women, and children, and on that's getting very awful and done bad. they don't see any connection between weapons being used in that context and delay weapons to israel. and then the idea that we are withholding intelligence information from is real so that they could target the boss leaders as, as, as our greatest ally of joe biden says, nothing disguised as is, as was pointed out, is ever true to finance. i want to know how much you got in his tip jarvis playing and i don't think he don't good enough to cover a bigger box, but he was narrow in that moment. i love that video. i showed it earlier th

mediator and observer, yes, but in any case , secretary of state antony blinken did his, i won't say kissingerbut without regrets. an important visit, and they showed the chinese and outlined certain lines, said: make up your mind, dear inhabitants of the sky. these two visits, a telephone conversation, or rather a telephone conversation, then a visit by secretary ellen to the secretary of the treasury of the united states of america, now blinken, which took place according to the arrangements of the telephone conversation between joseph biden and sidney pinney, which they showed, and... the united states of america is focused on security issues, because these two, these two trips to beijing were related to the first group of issues that i am referring to... ukraine, it is that chinese banks, including the state bank, finance the defense and industrial enterprises of the russian federation. the second is that china supplies dual-purpose equipment, goods and technologies, which means that there are also components and spare parts. parts for individual weapons. the third very dangerous thing is