my letter was not about kleiner perkins and i did not mention kleiner perkins at all.hey did not need to say anything, but they chose, i guess to throw me under the bus. and, i did not like that. they said they were shocked. and i sort of feel like the guy is saying, look, do not go swimming because there are sharks. if you get shocked by that, you do not understand the warning. i was presenting a warning. and secondly, they made quite a point of me not having been involved for some years and that is true. i think as i distance myself from the firm, there's been a corresponding decline in the firm that i will not go further than that. in a way, i'm missing them and i hope they miss me. and we will bury the hatchet over this one. >> your name is on the door. when you say something, it does reflect on them to a certain extent or do you worry about it? >> i did not -- i did not have them in mind when i wrote this piece. it was not about to them. it had nothing to do with them. they are right. their philosophy and strategy hasn't diverged significantly from my own -- have

quit my interview with kleiner perkins -- >> my interview with tom perkins, founder of kleiner perkinscebook is turning 10. dennis kucinich interview with mark zuckerberg. ♪ >> welcome back. i am emily chang. it is an inclusive story about the future of facebook. they are celebrating their 10th birthday on february 4. mark zuckerberg is turning 30 in may. i sat down with brad's dona -- brad stone who conducted the interview. not just the two anniversaries, it is been 10 years since his first date with his wife. fall typingt things. one of the things that jump that newe a surprising, and a kind of mobile strategy. they put a lot of emphasis on the social networking site. going forward, they have creative labs and they will be doing more apps. flexibleto be more about the way people use facebook's product. >> is a twist on clipboard? >> didn't want to consider it a clone. it has some unique features. they're doing some editing things with it. it is a way to look at friend updates and articles and -- in visually interesting ways. it is a newsreader like clipboard. it has no the clutter of

kleiner perkins, of which he is the perkins part wrote "tom perkins not been involved in the company in years. we were shocked by his views expressed today in "the wall street journal" and do not agree." "washington post" columnist vivic west spreads the blame, not perkins alone, he writes, but ceos and venture capitalist and even regular employees who have lost touch. with us this morning along with his role at the newspaper, a fellow at stanford, distinguished scholar, emery, vice president of singularity university, "time" magazine says he is one of the most influential voices in tech, joined by martin giles of the ecomist and kill lean taylor of tech crunch. i'm trying to -- i think we can all sort of agree, instead of just asking you, we can all just jump in on this, it was a stupid move. >> absolutely. >> there's no discussing it, it was stupid and we can have that verdict and moved on. one of the points you're raising though is that in general, tech is sort of blind to all of this. >> there's so many blowouts these days about dumb things the tech industry has done, a lawsuit r

. >> you mentioned kleiner perkins. us cofounder recently joined .e got a lot heat for his comparison of the war on america's 1% to nazi persecution of the jews. from your position where you are, what you make of his comments? >> unfortunately he made some very poor choices in analogies. it is really poor. it is sad. he is on a college man who made some mistakes. it sounds like he has stepped back from some of those comments. >> do you think kleiner perkins should take his name off the door? >> any firm or you have multiple founders -- he has not been with with the-- he has been firm for many years. many people just call the firm kp. that is one of the things about firms that have people's name on it. don valentine started sequoia, he did not want to call it valentine capital stock is about the company -- it is not about any individual. personally i imply we did not call it kvamme and olsen. we did not want to associate with me and chris. it is about the firm. it is not about the individual. e, we will be watching you guys. i thank you very much. >>

sequoia has been doing that for many years, as have kleiner perkins and others.hey just did not talk about it too much. mark andreessen has built a fabulous firm, they have just been more on the forefront of talking about these services. here at drive k we just hired a up making is heading sure we have all of the best talent in the midwest. getting talent is just as aboard as marketing and sales services. cofounderr perkins' just recently joined us on bloomberg west. he has been getting a lot of to ther this comparison not the persecution of the jews. and ohio, what do you make of -- in ohio, what do you make of his comments? ? >> he made some very poor choices and analogies. it is quite sad, because he is a very accomplished man. he made some mistakes. it felt like he is a step back from those comment, but a very poor choice of words. >> do you think he should take his name off the door? >> any firm or you have multiple founders, he has not been with ny -- he for many, ma has been with the firm for many, many years. people just call it kp now. when they started

inappropriate in every way, but i do not think he should be -- that does not speak to silicon valley, kleiner perkins what they represent, and i think it got really close to the world that i am in because he is someone that was once really relevant. now he is sort of just a crazy rich person who has totally lost touch with the universe. >> rap genius. >> my boys. we invested two and a half years ago. it was the first time i invested in a company where i had not met the founders face to face. i was on a skype call with them. they were legitimate lunatics, but so driven, so passionate, and had a vision to build something spectacular and they've continued to execute. have you seen the new iphone app? >> weight, backup. how do they get past the google situation -- they appear they tried to game results and google said they will not put them in results anymore. >> a lot of companies have been slapped by google for playing around the edges, but rap genius has signed with the two biggest levels. teach them a lesson? >> i do not think they are good at learning lessons. they operate by their own rulebook. so

conversation the income inequality debate, and i asked him whether he agreed with tom perkins of kleiner perkinsho made waves last feels the onee percent are being demonized. persecuted like jews. by the way,jewish agrees completely with tom perkins. this is part of what he said to me. one percent are being pummeled, because it is politically convenient to do so. the problem is the world in this country should not talk about and be of the one percent. it should talk about emulating the one percent. the one percent work harder. the one percent are much bigger factors in all forms of life. >> it was the last part that really angered people. the one percent work harder. that you should emulate the one percent. what are you trying to say is what people are getting at? >> michelle meyer with us with bank of america merrill lynch. the pew research trust goes to seven percent. with all the work that you do and the wonderful perspective you have, how much are the haves and have-nots? and this is a great deal easily number there has been a widening and income inequality. you see it in the data and in ter