>> where there could be attorney-client privileged material, for kmampl, where there could be anotherway, though, of making sure that the committee was informed. so, for example, a white-paper type of approach instead of providing the actual deliberations with a summary of that. it's still true to the underlying reasoning. >> any other documents that aren't appropriate? >> i just really don't know the universe of documents that we could be talking about. >> as i said, wrapped up in the attorney client is wrapped up. >> and you don't think even if there's no attorney client relationship, that you're not entitled to deliberative documents? >> i think there can be situations in which deliberative documents, where there would be an attorney as part of the scenario, but deliberations without attorneys could be something that would be protected by the dlibl rative process privilege. but i think it's important to understand not only the legal basis, which is what i feel like i would be responsible for if i were confirmed. but also what types of activities the cia is engaged in. >> it's been