according to the opinion poll, there is another survey that came out today, this is a survey by the kmisut political leadership in ukraine, about who is the leader of the ukrainian opposition. here are also quite interesting numbers, why why exactly these two sociologies caught my eye, because they appeared just in the interval between the announcement of zaluzhny as the new ambassador to great britain, so who do ukrainians consider to be the leaders of the ukrainian opposition, as evidenced by kmis data, 26% consider poroshenko to be the leader of the opposition, 17% they called the shelter, followed by people's deputies dmytro razumko, everyone. zaluzhny 3% and former adviser to the president of the office of the president oleksiy aristolych 2% and yuri boyko, by the way, the leader of the prohibition. the opzsh party is also 2%, but it’s like the president’s office here, i don’t know, sociologists, let's say this , clearly emphasized that zaluzhnyi was not in the opposition, was not the leader of the opposition, and well, it's like 3% there, that is , compared to 67% there, 3% here, t

britain, so who do ukrainians consider to be the leaders of the ukrainian opposition, as evidenced by kmisa, 26% consider poroshenko to be the leader of the opposition, 17. called the shelter, followed by people's deputies dmytro razumkov - 7%, yulia tymoshenko - 5%, zaluzhnyi 3%, and the former adviser to the president of the office of the president oleksiy aristovych 2%, and yuri boyko, by the way, the leader of the prohibition party opzsh, also 2%, it's like the president's office here, or i don't know, sociologists let's say this, clearly emphasized that zaluzhnyi was not in the opposition, he wasn't. the leader of the opposition and well, it seems that 3% there , that is, compared to 67% there, 3% here, they look a little small, but the rating of trust in the hard-working is the rating of the people's trust, it not a rating for a political figure, because zaluzhny never said that he wants to become a politician, although we understand that he is already a politician, he influences politics in ukraine more than anyone else when he was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukrai

anton hrushetskyi, executive director of kmis, is in touch with us now. glory to ukraine, mr.nton, we congratulate you. good day, glory to the heroes. well, a fresh, extreme sociological survey, right? my understanding is that, well, the situation is generally stable in the country, right? well, tell me, please, about your, about your latest figures. well, you know, we've had a few. polls, the last one we published, it was about ukraine's support for the west, and in general the factors for ukraine's success in the war, and this is the last question that we talked about what factors ukrainians think are most important for ukraine to succeed in the war, and by the way, the majority is expected of ukrainians answered that it is a cash support for the event, almost 60%, and to be honest, the main audience of these results is our western partners, and they still understood the importance of this issue and understood it, and ukrainians understand it, but in addition to this, it is necessary.. . to pay attention to the fact that a third of ukrainians speak of the higher efficiency a

but they show a trend, indeed, and kmis, and previous polls show, and sotsis, and kmis and others showt there is a tendency to increase distrust in the authorities, in the institutions of power, in some not just an increase in distrust, but, you know, at an angle of 45°, a decrease in distrust, well, at least in the verkhovna rada and in the cabinet of ministers, we need to draw conclusions from this, because this trend. is quite threatening during the war, because distrust of certain government institutions and distrust and growing distrust of certain personnel in power there is generally a decrease in trust in the state, including in mobilization and in many what else, that is why it is necessary to stop political games as much as possible now and draw conclusions of sociology, not from ratings, but from other indicators. but on the other hand, mr. maxim, these are the results of sociology, although they were probably predicted, and in principle it would be possible, even without conducting sociology, er, and polls, well, in principle , to predict that such and such a proportion coul

, so who do ukrainians consider to be the leaders of the ukrainian of the opposition, according to kmissider poroshenko to be the leader of the opposition, 17% called him a shelter. next come people's deputies dmytro razumkov - 7%, yulia tymoshenko - 5%, zaluzhnyi 3% and former adviser to the president of the office of the president oleksiy aristovych 2%, and yuriy boyko, by the way, the leader of the prohibition party opzsh also 2%, so it's like the office of the president , i don’t know, sociologists let’s say this, clearly emphasized that zaluzhnyi was not in the opposition, was not the leader of the opposition, and well, it’s like... 3% there, that is, compared to 67% there, 3% here, they they look a little petty, but the rating of trust in zaluzhny is a rating of people's trust, it is not a rating for a political figure, because zaluzhny never said that he wants to become a politician, although we understand that he is already a politician, he has the greatest influence on politics in ukraine, more than anyone influenced when he was the commander-in-chief, the armed forces of ukrai

well, the presidential prospects of the zaluzhno, and on the other hand , information appeared from kmis that, who are the leaders of the ukrainian opposition, they didn't name him there, uh, in this survey, there was no surname of the hard worker, but people named 3% called him the leader of the opposition. and it is a good thing, instead, the same survey of kmis gave the first and second place to petro poroshenko and serhiy prytula, and the appearance of serhiy prytula among the oppositionists, this is also a very big mystery, because i don't know the politician of the opposition politician serhiy prytula, well, i want to kill him, that is, i passed on all his statements, everything he said there during the last few years, well, there is no such positioner of serhiy prytula, no. how much are these ratings, how much can these numbers influence and influence the decisions of zelenskyi's office? i am sure that these numbers are decisive for the construction of domestic politics, and the zaluzhny took off precisely because volodymyr oleksandrovich, who is a textbook narcissist, has these s

for this, they would have armor against mobilization, since kmi'. the tonsil appeared disabled the marriage the suitors $10,000, but the wedding business failed. she was detained by law enforcement officers while receiving part of the funds, the state border service of ukraine informs. now the woman faces imprisonment for a term of seven to nine years. ukraine is rapidly losing people after the full-scale invasion of russia , from six to 8 million ukrainians left the borders of our country. mostly they are women. of working age and children. in addition, in the 23rd year in our country , the birth rate also decreased, and the number of premature childbirth increased by 30%. migration policy experts say that ukraine should already develop a plan to return citizens home. in order to return, there is a question of employment. and here i consider not so much the issue of refugees after the 22nd, but permanent ones. migrants who were looking for better, better work, should be focused on them, because they are the golden fund for the future of ukraine. yes, we should think about it already, alrea

, well, and emphasized once more. sif on the fact that zaluzhny was not included in this survey of kmis one of the alternatives offered to the respondents, and the fact that 3% of citizens simply actually entered him on the ballot, this indicates that he has a much higher rating, if he was offered to people right away, so maybe we don't know, maybe on the second one, well , hardly on the first one... he would have been in good standing, not a shelter, if he had been in these questionnaires from the very beginning, which i also noted that actually 17% were undecided, or 17 and another 17% said that at 17:18 there is no real opposition in ukraine, this is a big piece of the electoral pie, in fact more than 30%. 35% of citizens, they can make their choice later, later and sway this poll in one direction or another, and plus we don't know who will actually be nominated, when there will be elections and other popular people may appear there, i don't know about the plans of mr. budanov, i don't know about the plans of klitschko, sadovoy, well, we have a lot. politicians and public figures who

yes, or rather, it wasn’t even like that, i don’t remember who conducted it, razumkov, or sotses, or kmisrst question there is like, do you think that partly, well, that the responsibility lies with the authorities, but in particular with the president to zelenskyi, yes, conditionally from 70%, yes, we think that yes, he should be there, but do you trust the president, yes? we trust the president, he is a good man, normal, that is, people need this still, our people still need to be taught, how can you do this, but in the meantime, it turns out that we do not have another people, however, to be honest, the percentage is decreasing, that is , people are beginning to realize that since i believe that this person is responsible. although maybe she doesn’t take part herself, but it’s just bad, zelensky doesn’t have , for example, such an ability as selection, arrangement of personnel, yes, whatever they steal, he’s not a personnel officer, he’s bad, and this is his direct function, yes there in this case, so does not function well, and therefore, maybe he is a good guy, but i, for example, do

yaroslav, we want to talk with you about the survey conducted by kmis, about what people perceive as restrictions on democracy, for any bans that concern the internet, ah. react badly to the banning of telegram, although this social network is clearly harmful, because it is a social network that is launched, that is controlled by russia, and journalists are very well understand the harm of all kinds of anonymous telegram channels, and they talk about it repeatedly, but people consider any attack on telegram to be an attack on freedom of speech, why do you think we have such a situation? and well, sometimes people act irrationally, and, that is, we, for example, you started with the fact that... we still try to celebrate soviet holidays, although they understand in the soviet interpretation, actually, and such a day as the day of struggle for women's rights , march 8, so do not rethink, do not strive for greater equality and greater opportunities regardless of gender, sexual identity, and flowers are girls and the like, and people do not always act rationally when we are a country tha

president zelensky, yes. it was not like that, i don’t remember who conducted it, razumkov or sotses or kmisquestion there is like, do you think that partly, well, that the responsibility lies with the authorities, but in particular with president zelensky, yes, and there conditionally, 70% , yes, we think that yes, he is supposed to be there, but do you trust the president, yes, we trust the president, he is a good man, normal, that is, people need to... still , our people need to be taught , that how is it that it works out so well for you, but in the meantime it works out like that, well we don't have any other people, but , to be honest, the percentage is decreasing, that is , people are beginning to realize that i believe that this person is responsible, although maybe he himself does not participate, but it's just bad, zelensky isn't there. . an example of such an ability, such as the selection and arrangement of personnel, yes, no matter what they steal, he is not a personnel officer, he is bad, but this is his direct function, and in this case, it means that he does not function well

three hundred... hundreds named zaluzhny as the leader of the opposition, instead, the same survey of kmissecond place to petro poroshenko and serhiy prytula, and the appearance of serhiy shelters among oppositionists is also a very big mystery, because i don't know the politician, the opposition politician serhiy prytula, i want to kill him, that is, i passed on all his statements, everything he said there over the past few years, well, no such a positioner, shelters, to what extent are these ratings, how much these numbers can and do influence the decisions of zelenskyi’s office, i am sure that these numbers are decisive for the construction of domestic policy, and the zaluzhny took off precisely because volodymyr oleksandrovich, who is a textbook narcissist, he these social studies, these social surveys , as he asks, you know, hello my little mirror, tell me the whole truth, really, everyone is nicer, it’s not you who gives the hop, and accordingly, here too, they have such a behavioral stereotype that yes, someone only whoever can leave the stage and drag the sunny one somewhere, he ha

people called 3% called the leader of the opposition exactly zaluzhno, instead, the same survey of kmise first and second place to petro poroshenko and serhiy prytula, and the appearance of serhiy prytula among the oppositionists, this is also a very big mystery, because i don't know the politician of the opposition politician serhiy prytulo, well, i want to kill him, that is, i passed on all his statements, everything. what he said there over the past few years, well, there is no such oppositionist serhiy prytula, how much do these ratings, how much can these numbers influence and influence the decisions of zelenskyi's office? i am sure that these numbers are decisive for the construction of domestic politics, and the zaluzhny took off precisely because volodymyr oleksandrovich, who is a textbook narcissist, to him... these socialists and these social polls, as he asks, you know how the world is, my little mirror, tell me the whole truth and report it, i’m all crazy, it’s not you who gives it, and accordingly, here too, they have such a behavioral stereotype that yes, only someone who

president... it wasn't even like that, i didn't i remember who conducted it, razumkov or sotses or kmisfirst question there is like, do you think that partly, well, the responsibility lies with the authorities, but in particular with president zelenskyi, and there conditionally from 70%, yes we think , that yes, he is supposed to be there, but do you trust the president, we trust the president, he is a good man, normal. i.e. , it is necessary for people to still teach our people that how is it possible for you to do this, but in the meantime, it is possible that we do not have another people, but to be honest, a percentage this is decreasing, that is, people are beginning to realize that since i believe that this person is responsible, although perhaps he himself does not take part, but simply... well, it’s bad , zelensky, for example, does not have such an ability as selection, arrangement personnel , yes, whatever they steal, it’s not a personnel officer, he’s bad, but this is his direct function, and in this case, it means he’s not functioning well, and that’s why he might be a good

read surveys in the usa, we are there, well, how do we know here there is a rating group , there is a kmis is a deminitiative, we know what kind of sociologists we have in ukraine, we understand there, there is a center of intelligence, but in the usa we do not know who polled there, what is there, please, well yes, there are several such sociological campaigns in america, which are similar to ukrainian campaigns, they conduct surveys, but you understand the fact is that polls in a country with a population of 300... 40 million with a number of voters somewhere around 240-250 million, they are 8 months before the elections, they are not so important, i would say that it is not worth turning on them very much attention now , we will have to pay attention to the polls, starting from the end, maybe from may, from june, precisely to the polls in the swind states, where the fate of the elections will be decided, i would... now pay attention to other things, to other things , for example, primemarries continue, although the candidates are known, but they will still be to continue in the primary,