. >> you don't want to draw that the court -- a >> knott controversy, i think what he did was use a case that could have been resolved on narrow grounds. i am not suggesting that it was not a noble decision, but it might well have had the dramatic impact. it would result in relief. he resolved on the broad list -- on the broadest possible grounds. marshall's decision reflected a decision to pull the cord back. the jeffersonian said the white house, the jefferson orleans could block of the supreme court. there were trying to pack the court with federalists. marshall does not even get to it. he pulls back and resolve the case on a much narrower ground. the court has to resolve issues that are of great political significance. as marshall did, i think it is important to see if you can do that. it is important to recognize the consequences if you involve the court in politics. but some want to return to his somewhat personal thing. i remember during her confirmation hearings with senator shimmer and he asked you what your favorite movie was and i think that you responded that it was dr. zhiva

knott full engagement, because that would be against one of the red -- one of the pillars of their establishment. i do not think that the islamic republic, especially the right, once a fully normalized relation. if the u.s. opens an embassy in iran, then there will be pressure for the system to open up. this is not something that the revolutionary guards are interested in. the third point is that full engagement is under that type of environment. he was able to engage in the united states because that gave them some wiggle room. now covers all levels of government, from supreme leadership to the parliament. even if he becomes president, he will just be part of the executive branch. he will not be able to make major decisions. so, in conclusion, the u.s. should be a very patient. i do not think that sanctions will work with it planned. i think the leadership is pragmatic enough to engage the u.s. on a limited number of issues. it is a very dysfunctional system. thank you. [applause] >> dr keith crain will now explain the vulnerabilities in the iranian economy. >> i'm going to turn to talk little

the service of student loan companies, the banks in most cases, was -- their interest rates in an knott shell of the banks decided they had to compete with the direct student loan program set up by this congress so we saw anonymously we saw in the banking system with students loans the way we can see the public option, the public option will simply keep the insurance companies more honest and help keep prices down and help keep premiums down and help keep the copays and deductibles and check and in a word keep the insurance companies honest. today, private insurance competition insurers talk about and the defenders of private insurers and the opponents of public option talk about the private insurance competition but it's a bit of an oxymoron in a lot of places. in ohio the two largest insurance companies in my state account for 50% of the market in some cities it's literally 89% of the market. this bill -- we know that a public option but again discipline the market better in a way that wide-open competition would do. finally, mr. chairman, this bill would give providers the tools to i