it was not knowable at the time of the original hearing. i was somewhat confused about the issue that was raised by one gentleman who spoke having to do with the fact that the variance has never been heard. i thought that was what the hearing was, to hear the issues to do with the variance. i do not feel anything was presented that would cause me to want to grant a rehearing. commissioner fung: the information that was presented related to the impact on the open space, both in terms of the you blockage and shuttling -- we did talk about that. -- both in terms of view blockage and shadowing -- we did talk about that. the easement was also discussed. even though i voted against the appropriateness of the variance, i see no new information that would -- not necessarily change my decision, but in terms of calling for a rehearing. vice president goh: i would agree with commissioner fung. the standard is very high -- manifest injustice or new facts. we heard the facts of the tree coming down and miss troo beingr steroids -- of the tree coming dow