it is knowable, it is, you know, frankly knowable by his client.ask your client what -- >> i wish the question was, and if you don't know, can you get back to me tomorrow? >> right. and so, you know, everybody is playing this weird dance, whether -- there is knowable information, tons of knowable information, the president's lawyers are saying the house should have gotten it, and i think that's actually a fair argument. the democrats are saying, well, wait a minute, we're at trial, this information is knowable and wouldn't take a long time to get it and now that we're in trial, the senate should be the forum for getting it. and i think that argument also has merit. but, you know, the reality is that they want to get this thing done like the house wanted to get it done and it is going to get done and there is a ton of information that is not known today. but there say lot of information we're going to -- >> here is a question to which there is a knowable answer. how many republicans are there in the senate? 53. and that's the answer that you need to

and all of that was knowable, and now 25 days from the iowa caucus and people are stuck in the trial not make any sense. >> i actually think that she should have done it longer, and she wanted a trade deal after the trial. and she should have dragged it on and way more impeachable offenses that should have been heard for. >> and now, others who are going to "curb your enthusiasm" from bernie sanders and what he is taking into the debates. nt. one that covers health care costs, taxes, and any other uncertainties while still giving you the flexibility to make changes to your plan as often as you need. because when you're with fidelity, a partner who makes sure every step is clear, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. ♪ here's wishing you the bluest sky ♪ there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. little things can be a big deal. psoriasis, that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vo

the facts are there to the extent that they are knowable at this point. the democrats are in a little bit of a tricky position. they're arguing that from what we know so far it looks bad. from what and whom we can have, we believe it gets worse. so that creates a question mark that the republicans and, by extension, the president's legal team, will almost certainly use to prove poor effort in the house, you didn't get it done, and, two, we don't know the unknown, your job was to prove it and you didn't. how will it play? one indicator is the president. he's back home from davos. and he said earlier that he would love to be at the trial and he was pushed by a reporter, and then go. i might. why don't you? i'd love to. i'd like to sit in the front row, he said, and stare down the democrats prosecuting the case against him. what he did not say is that he would do what you could see as the measure of a person with nothing to hide, sit in the chair, take the oath, and tell us the truth. that apparently is not in his desires of what he would love to do. let's b

. >> there is a knowable global growth opportunity in terms of medical cannabis where we go from 20%countries to 40, 50, 60% of the countries in the world legalizing it. >> all right before we go on we want to mention that tim seymour is all in on the space. long a number of names a portfolio manager of a cannabis etf, also sits on advisory boards for cannabis companies and for all tim's disclosures you can get go to the fast.cnbc.com and what your take. >> the tilray store is they are moving in consumer packaged good veterans revlon veterans and places from crocks and other places to the c suite. make no mistake cannabis is a cp the g story in disguise doesn't matter on some level it's about destruction, branding all the things that some of the best consumer products in the companies in world do. that's where tilray positions themselves the good news is if you are thinking about the top macrostory, the addressable market in cannabis is growing. this is the good news. you may not get federal legalization in 2020 but look whapds with illinois went full adult as of january 1. this is a

the facts are there to the extent that they are knowable at this point.le bit of a tricky position. they're arguing that from what we know so far it looks bad. from what and whom we can have, we believe it gets worse. so that creates a question mark that the republicans and, by extension, the president's legal team, will almost certainly use to prove poor effort in the house, you didn't get it done, and, two, we don't know the

. >> there is a perfect storm happening in iraq that was all a knowable consequence of the administration's decision to take out soleimani. >> what are the big picture ramifications of this? someone said, goldberg on the program talked about 2003. the bush administration sold this bill of goods, but they put a lot of effort into it and it was a very thought out strategy. they were like leaking things to reporters and they were citing it on "meet the press," yada yada. this seems utterly haphazard. the trump administration is contradictory. they can't make cases as if they don't care. >> i guess in retrospect, you know, people can claim to have had one pulled over on them by the bush administration, that they believed the consistent with erring argument being made about weapons of mass destruction. they ultimately voted based on that intelligence. nobody can make that argument today. there is nobody here that can credibly believe there was actually an imminent threat, is the only way the executive branch can take a military axa broad without coming to congress. >> right. >> if you aren't sta

i heard a historian tonight say, as much as we've been surprised at the knowable percentage of lawmaker who's have not ever read the mueller report and a huge percentage of americans who have never read the mueller report, a lot of senators have not been immersed in the details of this case. and for a lot of them, the way the democrats are laying out their case, this may be useful. this may be the first they've heard of document x, document y, witness x. i suppose that is wholly possible. >> yeah. i think that maybe built into what you're saying is the assumption that facts here will move things, as if the senators sitting there, if they hear things, will have a different idea. >> forget my naivete. >> i'm just not sure we've seen that play out in the trump era at least. >> jeremy bash, i want to get you into this conversation as well. >> well, brian, i think the question that the house managers have effectively put forward is will there be a trial, or will there merely be opening statements? because if there are merely opening statements and then there is a motion basically to not have

and just for you at home, i am not giving out information right now that is not publicly knowable and widely distributed within all of the relevant circles. we're not giving information away about american vulnerabilities. i would never do that. but mr. secretary, when you look at how many different troops there are in the surrounding areas and countries, all well within reach of iranian capabilities, without them ever having to leave home, and more being sent to the region, what does that mean in terms of u.s. preparation? >> well, i think it means that -- and this is i'm sure something that's been underway, that you have to then make force protection of all of your assets, including civilian assets, diplomats in the region. that has to become a high priority. it's always been a dangerous region, but in this case, you really want to dial it up a little bit. the good news is, to the extnt you're dealing with the military, they do have forced protection capabilities. and i believe they've indicated that a lot of the diplomats ought to leave. but i think this is now going to become a ki

that is not entirely knowable because people are different all around the country, and it what subsection of the american public one is thinking about, but that would be another really good way to use our time right now. we talked about it in the china what subsection ofcontext, howe in selling domestic mobilization around our entity investment -- investment, ai investment, our diplomatic corps , so what if the -- what is the sweet spot with china that brings about that domestic mobilization but also leaves space for areas of cooperation we know we need. what is that sweet spot? some of you have listened to john favreau on pod save america, going around the and he found himself surprised to hear among independents and swing state voters, how much it mattered to people that we had lost the respect of people around the world, or that we feel alone. people in that interesting people who change their party affiliation from election to election. ugh, it is not good to have your respect and favorability ratings plummet. well, that is interesting and will have ramifications for the next administ

that is not entirely knowable because people are different all around the country and expense on subsection of the american public one is thinking about. but that would be another really good way to use our time right now, is to understand, we talked about it i think in the china context, how do you walk that line in selling domestic mobilization around r&d investments, around ai investments, around renewal and completely rebuilding our diplomatic corps. what is the sweet spot on china what it's not merely to return as were just talk but, not merely returned to serve the cold war, enemy that brings about that but then it leaves a space also for the areas of cooperation that we know we need. what is that sweet spot? some of your been listening to john favreau on pot save america, now the wilderness was been going around the country and he found himself very surprised to hear among independent and swing states, swing voters, how much it surprising matter to people that we lost the respect of people around the world are we feel alone. like people, again interesting though, it's one thing about

that is not entirely knowable because people are different all around the country and it depends on what subsection of the american public one is thinking about but that would be another really good way to use our time right now is to understand, we've talked about i think in the china context how do you walk that line in selling domestic mobilization around our and the investments. around ai investments. around renewal and rebuilding of our diplomatic corps. what is the sweet spot there on china where it's not nearly the return as we were talking about, not a return to a cold war enemy that brings about that domestic globalization but the face also for the areas of cooperation we know we need. what is that sweet spot? some of you have been listening to john favreau on positive america and we've been going around the country and he found himself very surprised to hear among independents and swing states swing voters how much it surprisingly matter to people that we have lost the respect of people around the world that we feel alone . people in that interesting middle, it's one thing abou

>> the issue set is knowable, and president trump beats all comers.the democrat side will be running on a big government socialism agenda, government takeover of health care. it's going to be free health care for illegal immigrants, an embracing of the green new deal which means elimination of fossil fuels and killing ten million jobs that goes with it and raising taxes. a tax increase on 90% of americans, and that would be a disaster. the general issues we're running against are going to be the same regardless of who the opponent is. there might be some differences around the edges depending on the personalty involved, but the president beats all comers. neil: all right. when you look at the environment right now, the economic recovery continues, the market these last few days notwithstanding, kind of stabilizes, but anything worrying? the impeachment thing seems to be going the way the president wants to see it with maybe a quick end. what could jar you? you could worry you? >> hard to predict what the future will hold, but i think when people ask,

available and knowable by the applicant and proponent and the public official before submittal of applicationirly high bar. it means that it needs to be things that are quantity tative. it can't be a broad concept such as, you know, compatible with the neighboring structures. it could be needs to have a certain type of articulation. it needs to be a certain height, certain materials. it has to be verifiable, quantifiable, and objective. we'll have to go by those standards with any future design guidelines. >> okay, next question is related to the replacement units. there is a lot there. to just talk me through, again, wi b. units, people can choose to go with, but what happened to rent controlled units? >> rent controlled unit that would be demolished? >> yeah. >> so we'll look at it if the unit is rent controlled by 80% of below, that's a low-income household and that falls under the requirement that you have to replace it with a bmr at the equivalent income. for rent controlled only, that is the only instance where we have the discretion to either replace it with a new rent controlled unit

where what is real, what is fake, is not discernible and not knowable.seqnces of that, for a democratic republic, areht fring, at best, to think about. >> narrator: one particular conspira theory was aired in america by a russian propaganda network, rt. >> ...theories about her health caught on... >> narrator: exaggerated and questionable stories about clinton'health... >> under a microscope are clinton's falls, coughs, and head motions (reporters talking) (laughing) >> have you talked about vice presidential possibilitiesith senator warren? >> you guys have got to try the cold chai. >> this video filmed in junewe viral and started a slew of rumors that clinton may have ha. a seiz >> we were watching stories abouhillary clinton appearin on russian propaganda websitesto like russiy and sputnik. >> a democratic frontrunner has been forced to refute rumors of her deteriorating health, maybe. p and then somehow ending very similar form in theight- wing media ecosystem of the united states-- breitbart, infowars, even fox news. >> whawas once a concern voiced

and its disingenuous for the president's counsel to argue that the defendant's state of mind is un-knowable, that it requires a mind reader, or is anything but the most common proof. but if i want more information, let's ask the president whether john bolton can help fill in any gaps about his state of mind. >> if you think about it, john, he knows some of my thoughts. he knows what i think about leaders. >> case is about the president's conduct in ukraine. john bolton knows a lot about that. let's hear from him. a fair trial demands it. and it's more than just ensuring a fair trial. it's about remembering that in america, truth matters. as mr. bolton said on january 30th, quote, the idea that somehow testifying to what you think is true is destructive to the system of government we have, i think, is very nearly the reverse, the exact reverse of the truth, end quote. now as manager schiff started this out, the truth continues to come out. again in an article today, more information. the truth will come out. and it's continuing to. the question here before this body is, what do you want your

available and knowable by the applicant and proponent and the public official before submittal of application. so that is a fairly high bar. it means that it needs to be things that are quantity tative. it can't be a broad concept such as, you know, compatible with the neighboring structures. it could be needs to have a certain type of articulation. it needs to be a certain height, certain materials. it has to be verifiable, quantifiable, and objective. we'll have to go by those standards with any future design guidelines. >> okay, next question is related to the replacement units. there is a lot there. to just talk me through, again, wi b. units, people can choose to go with, but what happened to rent controlled units? >> rent controlled unit that would be demolished? >> yeah. >> so we'll look at it if the unit is rent controlled by 80% of below, that's a low-income household and that falls under the requirement that you have to replace it with a bmr at the equivalent income. for rent controlled only, that is the only instance where we have the discretion to either replace it with a new rent