and i'm wondering, u knw, what is e hold up and how might that be hrting mexo's efforts? >> it's very fstrating for mexi because there have been all kind of holed ups in ter of procurement, th appropriations process ithe congss, helicopters that were promisedave not been devered. some of the aid is conditioned on human rights and certification by the congress that the army's not ausing human righ in mexico. there have bn any number of cuses to not deliver aid whi is insufficient begin with. >> the president was in guadajara this weekend and i mean president obamand he reiteratedmerica's commitment to helping to fight this dg war. whatind of action would mexico like to e from the united states? >> well, the important -one of the important thgs is we shouldn'think of it in terms of helping mexicwith its drug fight. i thinthe positive step that obama took and that hillar clinton took earli was in acknowledging that this is shared responsility. this is a r that we're feeling with our consumpti of drugs and our -- and the money cing from the united stes. and guns, not to menti

gwen: fromnancy in washiton state wants to knw hy the single ayer approac never gained tras, for instanc >> he was a supporter of ingle payer way bckwhen hewas a state senator i illinois. he uickly ce to realize in the united stateof america, that is not a plitically vible route t take and e is nothing if not a pragmatist. >> that is wy the publicoption is so controveral among crics, they see it as a trow june hor. if you put in a pubic opion that pivate isurers can compete against and ultimately of course government wil piece by piece take over thsystem. theyiew him as someone ho is secretly tryinto get there even though he said he is ot. gn: public option, going to happen still? >> i don't know. i ink that it's on lie suort right now. i think what we're -- i may come out of the house. i think thepresident ight now is centered on o goal. that is he has to have asenate bill because youan't go to conference without ne. so i thi we have rched a point where co-op great, whatever. t him a bill so th can go to conference. if you have co-ops d a public plan, what you might look atis a trigger

now, you knw, that sai, there e all sorts of influenc that are coming into these lawmakers all e time. i think what most of them ould tell you is, you now, campai contributions isne sort of influee. their home and their dstricts d their states right now are anotr sort of influence. i think th would say, you know, we actor all of tis in and do what w think is best. >> if you look at ho much mone is at play here when ou look at aertising and donations, i mean, the union give a hge amount omoney to all of the democrats who are in cngress. they hava position on tis. therare so many interest groups who carebout what happens th health re reform, it's ard to ay that articular check had mo influence than these100 other checks th came from other grou as well. the is just a whole lot f money around this. >> it is true people n the key health committs, they get a lot of money rom the health industry. max bcus is an ineresting guy right now. he is on th hot seat. he is trying to lead he bipartisan group thahas the last hope thathere will be a deal. a lot ofemocrats are very unhappy wit him. they

you knw, we know the story.we've seen the news, we' seen the senate submmittees and the this that they've discovered that were wrong that... you know things weren't as they were told to us to be. but i don't want to rp on that. whe i want t go.... >> rose: well, you had an album. >> yeah, i d thelbum. i did thelbum, i said all of what i had to sy and n i don't likeo do it again. i don't likesinging the songs, i did it i'm not cnn. i on't play it over and over. >> rose: inow how you feel about that. tually, i agreeith that. (laughs) >> so i don't want to do that. i wa to... what i want to do is try to make a difference in anoer way. i really thk-- and somewhere along the line th year i figure out-- that, you know, i really can do mething else. i he a lot of other interes, you know? and one of th is mecnical and i look back at... d technology and all of the things. i look atwhat's going o and i go, you know, whyan't ibe one of the people who tries to do something? to replace the type of transportati that we use? >

so conservatives and tend to knw about stuff that goes on in their world and stuff that goes on in the main stream world. >>host: something that is set. that is why all . he was always witty enough. the gun manufacture is a very witty, intelligent person. the devil has all the great lines. what has happened to us? >>guest: well, once people on the right have been reduced to a caricature, to cartoon figures their ideas do not have to be engaged. one of the most interesting things. rush limbaugh has decided, and i've seen it elsewhere, as well. his listeners are actually better informed according to pure research than average mainstream liberals. and by the way, something else liberals don't know, is that conservatives are more giving in their -- more charitable. there was the guy from syracuse who did a book about it which, in fact, got no attention from the mainstream press because it ran counter to the liberal narrative. >>host: something else curious. there are older than the average audience of liberals. people who are older have a better background in popular culture. they know old

be that a new financial product needs to be tested through one cycle, one market cycle, before you knw it is worth anything or not. and so the issue has always been, there is just -- since the early '70's there has been this just incredible boom in financial innovation. and a bunch of t innovations of turned out to be either just completely useless or just designed wrong. so the feel with all these things, i just wrote my column this week. i wrote it next to a pool at my parents' house, so if you have problems with it that is probably why. but i wrote my column about this whole high-frequency trading controversy. the reason is happening is because we now have this very competitive environment with lots of different exchanges competing with the new york stock exchange and nasdaq. and they all need volume to make money. and so these new traders, who make new trades every millisecond. that generates tons of volume. so all the exchanges are catering to them and doing all they can do to make these people trade even more. it is clearly a much better system than when there was one exchange, b

>> you knw, the advisors ofered a planning scenario that was men be used to te thiseriously, so that states and lol health department,, the pivate sector, the publ would be aware that things could be quite challeing. but we reall can't predict exactly how much disease here's going to be this fall and winter. i can say we're working ha tobe prepared and rey to po. ifz so it's notecessarily a rediction? >> they use the words a planning scenario, rig. >> ifill: how aout, even if there's possibility ofhey say 1.8 million hospitalizations, say it' only a million hospitalations. soundlike a lot. is the u.s. hospil system prepared for that rate of adission? >> you know, we're workng closely acro government to stengthen the preredness of the hospital system and the medical commuty in general. the governmt has released funds to strengthen hospital preparness as well as state and local health preparedness, and we're carryg out a number o outrch activities this smer to work closely with the mical community and theublic health mmunity as well as communicators to ally be as prepared as posble. th

t itis trent lott wrote him a letter basically said "dear ted, if they only knw you the w we do."e mean by that, al? >> wll, that he was... he was delitful company, everyone loved to be around him. he's a guy that as we discussed the la few minutes o this sh who could coromise. he was not unasonable. he didn't demonize peop at all. he dmonized positions but n people. bob bourqumight have been a rare exption of that. and almost ever senator at i ever talke to really led ted kennedy. charlie, we onheutside just... you kn, we observe and we hear om other reporters... or excuse me, hear fromother of s colleagues but when i w on that prole inourage coittee and have been for themm last seven years, i had sort of an inside glpse. it was a nber of quite a pressive people, present companyxcluded, on that company.ed senatored that cochran and olympia snowe, grat historians andhis beloveniece caroline. sotimes we would beeadlocks ecause there were lots ofreat nomation and ted kennedy would then weigh . in t beginning it was confusi where he was going. in a couple mites you knew exactly where

it was quite an experience of looking at this and knw when the things that could rock to ur boat andou'd say oh god, oh no, and then coming to the appreciation all of this is great. it's just different for each one of us. that for me was a profound experience. i learned a lot about her and she learned a lot about me was how we would like to incorporate at hn the next book and see if we can come out the other end of it. >> arere any other questions? >>here was the request for some poetry. >> i am not sure which one. >> she is a good reader. >> you don'tave to convince us. >> [inaudie conversations] >> absolutely, yes. >> what i would ask is he read a portion that we we could get -- and >> [inaudible] >> okay, why don't you read yours and we will find her some. >> again, the poem is so much of the woman on the andndt is on page one,tartsage 125. up from the pine trees and tall grass and seaweed surrounding the peoples in a ltle town in the south spring forth a humanity that is deep in new. into the hallowed hallways and the sterilend brooms and stately facade preseing the privileged an

h do we knw?veuled in his fav, but long term, i d't now on procer into that would wan toake thechance again onhim. he's tente acor, no question >> coue. tnk you. >>s that it? th's a wgot. that'shat you do, andy. >> wh do i do >> you do i all and you d it well. you can catch an, i you are a late-nit erson, trsda nig lis a dnight, wheneosts"watch whatapns live" on brav >>something upext hnow a bi out, peeverce is isthe inspirin stoes ildhd canc svivors, right after ts. c >> tomrow kis off childhood canr awarenes nth. ckluyaylucky to have twochdhd caer survirs with us. they shareheir amazing urneysn ersevence." >> the author created a nonofit to send childhood canrurvivors to llege. acork aolen glider are herewith he y are 24 years o. >> iam, s. >>here d youome up with thiinteres >> it happed when was 6 yearsl i went to a campith somef nir famy frids, and it s fo cildren goin thrgh ea o, and as 6rs sethig kinof spked withi i ianted ck b i we backhen i s 13 i was s derro kd ids own ageand ind f trned

. >> of course, you know, without an audit weever knw. itust seems that is it would be the benefit to us to know what the details discussion why is there -- why is there any value? i just don't quite agree with that. because it's really t discussion that we had. we're not -- like i made my point in the opening statement. this is after the fact. this is after you've had your meeting. this is after you've done something. and also the more information the market gets the better the market operates. and i they know what you are thinking about and planning, five years forheinute is really way too long. gentleman, your time as expired. but the widness may answer. >> i think we do explain what we're doing and what we are anything within three weeks. and ample opportunity to question chairman bernanke wn he comes out for hearings about why he's doing what he's doing. we would be glad to work if you on how we could be more transparent and more helpful. i agree with you, that for the most part transmore thanty and exchange of ideas is better for th