kohs demonstrates with the case of morgellons.he mayo clinic calls it "an unexplained skin disorder characterized by sores." but the wikipedia page dismisses morgellons as a "delusional belief." greg: so i'm just going to make a little comment here. sharyl: let's see what happens when kohs adds a research footnote that differs with that narrative. greg: they can just go to this link and you get the abstract of sharyl: in less than an hour, kohs' edit disappears. greg: i see that our edit to morgellons was reverted after about 38 minutes or so. sharyl: it was reverted by an administrator who is anonymous, but for his user name. if you know where to look, it's possible to see the many wikipedia topics the same editor worked hard to control. greg: it seems to me that this is someone who is either involved with the medical profession or the pharmaceutical profession. they probably have an agenda to discredit or to suppress alternative medicines, things of that nature. sharyl: one study found mistakes in nine out of ten wikipedia medic

harold koh. with while there is broad agreement asked tohe u.s. and eu the importance of a rule-based approach to water, are there significant differences in how they interpret key elements of international humanitarian law? allies differences among in interpreting the law of war undermined the possibility of complementary, coordinated and ultimately effective action? : first of all, i think there is widespread agreement. the agreement far outweighs the disagreement and will probably continue to do so. exercise is increasingly becoming active in europe, which by the way, i think lends itself to the notion of greater collective standards. it is high time for an agreed statement of principles, high time for public discussion of the assured principles. but i think are the two main points of disagreement that have emerged is on what happens when a state has not explicitly consented to a military action on its soil? to what extent can you invoke the notion of unwilling or unable as a proxy for state consent? for example, if you have a knows the nato le

my question is for professor koh. i'm interested in how you define international norms in regards to international law, and if you or do you see counterterrorism laws ever reaching this threshold? >> thank you. and the third question, gentleman, second row. >> thank you. lee roberts, student at george washington university. my question is for both panelists, professor koh listed upon which i did not dwell special operations regarding specific instance. as professor koh alluded to in 2011 the united states launched a raid into pakistan to kill our capture osama bin laden. while the service members who conducted the raid were technically under the administrative control of the cia, whom the pakistani government agreed to operate in the country. i believe i'm reasonable in saying this distinction is lost on the world and indeed on pakistan, itself, who protested a violation of its sovereignty by the american military but did not protest too loudly or long due to the shakiness of the position. is the raid approved by the

he is certainly a friend and admirer of our lecturer today, harold koh. he has, over the years, had various connections with brookings including writing his first book under the imprint of the brookings institution press. i think it was about 35 years ago, maybe even longer than that. and we've had events for him when his recent books have come out. and back in 2014, the brookings institution entered into a partnership with the hague institute for global justice and we decided to work together on an annual lecture, followed by a discussion of the sort that we are going to have today. and i'll come back to the institute which is represented here and i'll say a word or two about him in a moment. but i would like also, because of my own personal background with harold, to say a few things about him. i had the distinct pleasure of working with him in government during the clinton administration, when he was the assistant secretary of state for democracy and human rights. and as we all remember from the 1990, there were challenges on virtually every continent

. >> andy: my first experience with this kind of an atmosphere in thailand happened in koh pha ngan in it was like, "oh, she's into me." and, like, at some point she sat on my lap, and she's like, "oh, well i have to go now. i have to go do something." and she gave me a kiss, and i was like, "i'm in." and the show started. ♪ you can forgive a guy for making a mistake. >> anthony: totally. many ladyboys, frankly, are pretty spectacular looking, especially the ones who have breasteses. you know, the women are harshin' the buzz. this should be a guy thing. >> andy: absolutely. they should have a sports bar. >> anthony: actually, that's a -- brilliant idea. >> andy: we should bring that to new york. >> anthony: okay. if we had a ladyboy show in a sports bar, you're gonna watch football, drink a lot of beer, at around beer number eight bring out the ladyboys. just my luck. at a show like this, what happens. what she says. i end up kissing the one ladyboy in thailand who looks like ernest borgnine straight on the lips. of course i am completely oblivious to the dayglo white lipstick all over

he is certainly a friend and an admirer of our lecturer today, harold koh.e has over the years had various connections with brook ags including writing his first book under the imprint of the brookings institution press. i think it was about 35 years ago, maybe even longer than that. and we've had events for him when his recent books have come out. and back in 2014, the brookings institution entered into a partnership with the hague institute for global justice and we decided to work together on an annual lecture followed by a discussion of the sort that we are going to have today. and i'll come back to the institute which is represented here and i'll say a word or two about him in a moment. but i would like also, because of my own personal background with harold, to say a few things about him. i had the zing pleasure of working with him in many government during the clinton administration when he was the assistant secretary of state for democracy and human rights. and as we all remember from the 1990, there were challenges on virtually every continent on th