>> sally kohn, great to see you.heye, always a pressure to have you with us. >> thank you. >>> more than a dozen women are claiming comedian bill cosby sexually assaulted them. ahead at this hour, you'll hear from three victims who spoke together for the first time. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ah, ♪ h it. ♪ push it. ♪ p...push it real good! ♪ ♪ ow! ♪ oooh baby baby...baby baby. if you're salt-n-pepa, you tell people to push it. ♪ push it real good. it's what you do. ♪ ah. push it. if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. ♪ ah. push it. i'm pushing. i'm pushing it real good! how can i ease this pain? (man) when i can't go, it's like rocks piling up. i wish i could find some relief. (announcer) ask your doctor about linzess-- a once-daily capsule for adults with ibs with constipation or chronic idiopathic constipation. linzess is thought to help calm pain-sensing nerves and accelerate bowel movements. it helps you proactively manage your symptoms. do not give linzess to childre

kohn says i wonder republican federation republican in the sense of a federation state that has liberal democratic type constitutions but i do not want their world state. why? because the world state could result in despotism. in other words for kant the diversity of peoples or nations is a protection against the kind of despotism that would destroy the freedom and to my mind there is almost no difference between us kant's objections to a world state and the one that strauss ultimately makes as philosophically grounded or argued objection in the final pages. i see no essential difference in that line of argument and of course that makes up for the fact that as you noted it comes through in strauss's lectures that he was actually sympathetic to the project of european integration. he didn't see european union or the european community as a kind of threat as a world state that would suppress diversity of opinion and thought. unlike the criticisms of transnational integration by people like raskin who assume that any project that has as a cosmopolitan character that seeks to extend a gover

believe that we have some great central bankers here, that we are seeing heroic efforts by bernanke, kohn and others, draghi. they are efforts that are exceptional things that monetary policy has to do because fiscal policy has completely failed in europe, is trying not to fail in japan. while we are the least ugly kid on the block we still under perform. so i do think that we have to really take a fresh look at this and how it relates to our responding. and then the second issue i make on that is that i do think that one has to take a little more seriously the do no unnecessary harm mandate. at one place you see that is the discretionary sequester has been a terrible thing that was implemented after that paper. there is always a part of this sequester that hits the entitlement side where they do protect the low income programs. and the reason i say this is that if you are looking in the early '90s et cetera as much as you might have disagreed with newt gingrich you perhaps feared that perhaps one might have to do more reductions across the board that could hurt people you wouldn't want t