when, if we want to deal with the philosophy of konkur , will it become necessary for us to hold konkur, in very simple language, conduct a test to select the people we have, it goes back to the existing capacity and capabilities. in some parts of the country, we do not have the facilities, we do not have the capacity, let me tell you, the conditions. we can't fit at the request of people, we will create capacity for them, we will hold an exam according to the capabilities we have, one of the questions was that if now, on behalf of your excellency, if you allow mr. zarei to answer this, we are coming , we oppose the entrance exam. and we argue that the entrance exam should be removed, what caused it, what is the problem , a process that has 150 years of experience , has been tested and is being held all over the world. i don't want to say that my defense of the entrance examination is not an absolute defense, but its shortcomings must be fixed. what made us come now and let's keep repeating and say the entrance exam if there is one. eliminating the entrance exam is a consequence of our

what does konkur mean , look at its literal meaning , look at the discussion of english equivalents, look at this. konkur means test, it means assessment, it means competition and creating competition. when, if we want to deal with the philosophy of konkor, it becomes necessary for us to hold konkor. or hold a test in many languages ​​to select those people which we are going back to the existing capacity and capabilities of the country, somewhere we don't have the facilities , we don't have the capacity , we don't have the conditions, we can't create the capacity according to the people's requests, we will hold a test. according to our capabilities, one of my questions was that if you allow mr. zarei to answer this on behalf of your excellency, that we are coming to oppose the entrance exam and argue that the entrance exam should be removed, what caused it? what a problem, a process that has served for 150 years. he has experience and has been tested all over the world it is being held, i don't want to say that my defense of the entrance exam is not an absolute defense, but under th

konkur means taking an assessment and test outside of education and its independence. this is a basic problem that organizations also have. education is education itself. he produces content, he teaches himself, he grades himself , you find a minister , he didn't give himself less than 18, why? he is satisfied with his own work, others should be satisfied, i say evaluation, if it is going to happen , by the way, he should be removed from the breeding education, when he comes to evaluate his own product , he cannot give an honest report , he has to change his standard again, of course, the analysis presented proved that the transparency that was done is true, but it is not possible when it comes to performance evaluation. some places where it becomes a red point and a weakness of education , you have to be under the supervision of a minister who obeys you have to adjust the report to their satisfaction, i say. it should be independent and separate from the organization, which means that i should be the one who works, the evaluator and the supervisor. it's true that i sa