let's talk about how the nuclear balance of power has changed with our good friend konstantin bogdanov from mmo kostya hello. let's immediately dispel some kind of misunderstanding that is now hovering, especially it is active in minsk they are developing russia, because nuclear weapons are not transferring everything to anyone, russia remains under our control; it has not transferred, does not transfer nuclear weapons. this is a question of finding nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, and again. it is a fact that has not yet taken place that in the future it will be possible to do it after the corresponding storage facilities are in operation, because nuclear weapons are under the bush, but require rather complex and live technical support. including for everyday, like the first of july they promise that july 1 it was officially announced that such a repository would be created. that is, after that, technically , nuclear weapons can be deployed on the territory of belarus and there is no violation of any provisions of the day, as some argue, too . well, with interpretations, e

thank you, konstantin bogdanov was with us china brazil signed an agreement on the transition to tradingies. the united states tripled the supply of oil to the european union on the sale of russian oil to india increased 22 times scattered facts. this week the built-in mosaic is being put together, the world is rapidly reorganizing itself towards a new system partition and politically discarding striving for universal approaches and economically shredding. even those markets that remained more or less unified during the cold war are what we are seeing. this is a very rapid restoration of the division of the world into east and west , the largest russian energy companies are almost completely reorienting themselves to customers in asia. the time when europe begins to receive raw materials from any other sources. nothing like this, we have not seen before both the large-scale and the furcation of the market that determines the trend. if you turn back to a hundred years ago, the parallel, not the most radiant, was also structuring associations that quickly went from ideological economic to