konstantin valentinovich to change he says strategy.l, the tactics, probably, you also support these proposals, it seems that they understand, it is important for us to understand, that’s what if something needs to be changed , it means. there is this due to the fact that they are bombing in the wrong place and bombing in the wrong place and not so and so much. how much is needed or is it because there are tactical strategic problems and not enough people to implement the tasks that have been set, and here we can talk. for example, there were blows, let's say this one is there in kharkov yesterday and so on. and these strikes will bring victory in ukraine closer or not, given that the troops, especially we are talking about what, that there is a choice. now, in fact, there is a choice of mobilization. it will drag along with it a number of other issues related to economic issues, because mobilization, if everything about the military, we are talking about mass mobilization, then we are talking about what the people who now work in facto

this is the question the next question bogdana anatolyevich or konstantin valentinovich say that if weof missile strikes all of a sudden to some degree, because missiles are also a bomb. this is also a product that does not need to be produced endlessly. so, if there is an intensification, does this mean that with this tactic russia will be able to reach successfully take and take chernigov, take kharkov, you understand that with the forces that we have now we will take we didn’t take yes, yes, well, with bombing alone, this, by the way, is also shown by american experience and the british that they are bombarders alone. no matter how intense they are, you can't uh, so you need something else that is necessary. enough of their forces and we do not have others at the moment. this is a very serious problem here. and this problem is at the heart of those problems that do not have the strength, but we do not have confidence that it is time to apply his decision. yes, we don’t have a decision taken, because, well, there are such forces from such blows, about which you speak, but we generall

yes , it means konstantin valentinovich. who is really there, who is blackmailing, but here we had an english uncle there who says that this fifth point is a threat to the existence of russia, here it is the main one, because the russians are losing the war and next year they will have no other way out . how professional does such an assessment seem to you, that we are losing the war and will nuclear, firstly, all these formulations are not taken out of context. so that's not the essence of the real content. they are lord, they are all in their texts. e sphere of nuclear e nuclear deterrence. i have dealt with this document in great detail. well, it doesn't suggest. ok then. it was not deployed by the winged ones. missiles are already our borders later to hit with a nuclear club or hypersonic weapons are not deployed. they are already really deploying their hyper in germany, which you already understand from it should not. this is nonsense utter grouping troops have already been nato data for a long time, until we hit. this

now let's move on, here's to the faces, how konstantin valentinovich suggested.e is, unfortunately, gone. he can no longer remain on the air today, which means the experience of the pledged, that is, the ukrainian military. we are not taking now. this means that the european politicians of the organization are also at war with us. who is the word? who makes mr. barrel the head of european diplomacy, he shakes the world community with his statements. and uh, representatives of the european commission, ma'am, she plows on the niva of these energy restrictions, a pathologist of our energy prices, and so on and so forth. we are talking about it today we will talk in sufficient detail, but first, mr. barrel, we will remember once again, and the european side says that there is no reason to see a conflict at all, that this is some kind of mistake. the translators didn't check it. you probably know, yes, that barrel performs? monday at a european event called our country fascist and said that russia has a fascist regime. naturally, we reacted to this. here is now a litt

and we continue like this, uh, konstantin valentinovich spoke. many years ago, and then coalitions will be formed there at some stage. here, if necessary, of course, this is a coalition, but here, as with this, well, the first one that comes to mind is the chinese, of course, but how suitable they are. here 's the definition of a party face. let's take a look at the plot of russia's most powerful ally in the fight against the collective west it is customary to consider the chinese to be its two million army, just last week, will the prc relocate closed meetings with the military urged them to prepare for a real war, the chinese leader stated the need to master the new situation, understand the requirements of the tasks, focus on preparing for wars, and also have the courage and follow and innovate and compared the strengths of the parties from russia to china almost. nato has more than 3.5 million military personnel. the alliance surpasses russia and china in terms of the number of armored vehicles. but inferior in the number of combat tanks and

i would very much like to see how konstantin valentinovich sivkov said this, and our authorized ones,, which, for example, he expects from them yes, a military expert, because the number of questions . unfortunately, it is accumulating and it is not in our power journalists if we do not receive this information. we can't just talk to people. this is indeed a very fine line to break. no way, so please, dear empowered people. listen to our today's program, maybe a little more carefully than you usually do now. the thin line is such a completely peaceful time. we have such a wonderful picture, it reminds me of it. something from my school past there, such as friendship of peoples and so on and so forth, but if earlier in the soviet union we used to say that as a rule. here we have 15 republics and that's it. there was no further calculation. and now they say we live in russia, representatives of more than 200, in my opinion, people, yes, or something like that, of course, it’s good, but sometimes, again, there are hmm , it’s like, like in the old days, out of the blue, out of the blue co