. >> any opposition hearing none, the minutes as amended by commissioner kopp and myself are approved turning to item number 4 is a discussion and possible action to approve ethics commission regular meeting of for calendar 2017 this is a new procedure of that the executive director has suggested to give rather than giving the notices once a month giving the public awareness of agreed dates assuming at dates on the calendar suggest in the attachment so one can plan over the 12-month period. >> any discussion. >> no as you point out commissioner keane not a requirement but keeping on the policy agenda as well as trying to enhance engagement the public ass are dates that conform with the requirement in the by laws and accepting over the time needs to change it had will be changed into a special meeting hopefully gives did public consideration. >> i noticed in looking at it you've take into account the christmas period in 2017 so it won't be a special meeting we'll be meeting on a regular meeting of and so in any case any commissioner have any comments or concerns? >> i'll call for publi

. >> any opposition hearing none, the minutes as amended by commissioner kopp and myself are approved turning to item number 4 is a discussion and possible action to approve ethics commission regular meeting of for calendar 2017 this is a new procedure of that the executive director has suggested to give rather than giving the notices once a month giving the public awareness of agreed dates assuming at dates on the calendar suggest in the attachment so one can plan over the 12-month period. >> any discussion. >> no as you point out commissioner keane not a requirement but keeping on the policy agenda as well as trying to enhance engagement the public ass are dates that conform with the requirement in the by laws and accepting over the time needs to change it had will be changed into a special meeting hopefully gives did public consideration. >> i noticed in looking at it you've take into account the christmas period in 2017 so it won't be a special meeting we'll be meeting on a regular meeting of and so in any case any commissioner have any comments or concerns? >> i'll call for publi

. >> any opposition hearing none, the minutes as amended by commissioner kopp and myself are approved turning to item number 4 is a discussion and possible action to approve ethics commission regular meeting of for calendar 2017 this is a new procedure of that the executive director has suggested to give rather than giving the notices once a month giving the public awareness of agreed dates assuming at dates on the calendar suggest in the attachment so one can plan over the 12-month period. >> any discussion. >> no as you point out commissioner keane not a requirement but keeping on the policy agenda as well as trying to enhance engagement the public ass are dates that conform with the requirement in the by laws and accepting over the time needs to change it had will be changed into a special meeting hopefully gives did public consideration. >> i noticed in looking at it you've take into account the christmas period in 2017 so it won't be a special meeting we'll be meeting on a regular meeting of and so in any case any commissioner have any comments or concerns? >> i'll call for publi

chairman >> yes, commissioner kopp? >> i should like to request an investigation by our staff of the following apparent facts: a committee known commonly as no on d, h, l and m was formed, d, h, l, and m, refer to propositions on the november 8th san francisco ballot. to raise money to defeat each of those measures. the san francisco chronicle reported on or about november 9th that with the mayor's help, and i quote "with lee's help the no on d, h, l and m campaign raised and pend more than $2,200,000 about ten times as much was spent to them of support them." "them" being the ballot measures, d, h, l and m. the second fact is that the person named tony winacker described as a " described as a senior advisor, took a leave of absence from the mayor's office and managed the campaign to defeat all of those four measures. and as quoted as criticizing the san franciscans who were responsible for those being on the ballot including various members of the board of supervisors. i'm informed and believe that mr. winacker isn't r

>> 1993. >> judge kopp, if i could interject?'t want to disagree with the city attorney's office, but the sunshine ordinance task force does not appear to have jurisdiction over woeful violation by. all other violations of the sunshine ordinance, including open meetings and public records act and responses is with the sunshine ordinance task force in terms of investigation. >> to the exclusion of the ethics commission. >> the language would suggest that and the ethics commission is to handle the enforcement of orders issued by the task force. so if you think of yourselves as the enforcement authority for another body that does the evidentiary inquiry and investigation and makes the order, that is how the ordinance is setup right now. >> i think of myself as trying for the taxpayers to avoid duplication. but i have to do more studying. >> if i could respond to something mr. pilpel said? i did include and -- i did not include in my verbal -- i'm sorry, what? i did not include in my verbal summary, but i did include in my written su

chairman >> yes, commissioner kopp? >> i should like to request an investigation by our staff of the following apparent facts: a committee known commonly as no on d, h, l and m was formed, d, h, l, and m, refer to propositions on the november 8th san francisco ballot. to raise money to defeat each of those measures. the san francisco chronicle reported on or about november 9th that with the mayor's help, and i quote "with lee's help the no on d, h, l and m campaign raised and pend more than $2,200,000 about ten times as much was spent to them of support them." "them" being the ballot measures, d, h, l and m. the second fact is that the person named tony winacker described as a " described as a senior advisor, took a leave of absence from the mayor's office and managed the campaign to defeat all of those four measures. and as quoted as criticizing the san franciscans who were responsible for those being on the ballot including various members of the board of supervisors. i'm informed and believe that mr. winacker isn't r

the headlines kopp partly cloudy skies, tomorrow a few high clouds, especially for the morning.chance of a few showers, primarily the morning hours as well. should be drive for the new year's eve festivities. you can see our calendar showing december 2016 ending and say hello to 2017. here's the forecast for the 31st kopp partly cloudy skies and the fireworks from san francisco. 45 to 50 degrees by midnight in the upper 30s to mid 40s across the entire bay area. san francisco more like 45 degrees. no umbrella needed as we check out the fireworks for saturday night. outside, we can show you looking towards the bay bridge. just some scattered high clouds paying us a visit. no raindrops expected. maybe a slight chance of showers close to monterey bay, that's just about it. the main potential should be focused south of the bay area toward southern california. that green showing up on the radar, so i guess we cannot rule out the possibility of a sprinkle. high clouds out there right now and into friday morning. ski reports, snow report for sierra-at-tahoe looking pretty good. looking

kopp >> yes. i appreciate the fact that complaints and the resultant complaint law which is provided to commissioners as confidential is required by charter provisions. so i don't know how far i can go publicly asking questions but i think you said there are 84 pending complaints or did i miss here? >> that's great. there's 84 matters implementor eight review which means- >> under: interview, not reflected in the law? >> right. the law yes. >> all i know is the law >> you have the log which is 23 i think right now >> now one area your report didn't seem to cover was something i mentioned in passing but i will reiterate now is the number of planes which investigations that because the da says don't investigate further on the premise of the da will handle this. without conveying any complaint log specifics, there's a lot of those andhave you considered whether there should be a time limitto cease investigation? >> yes. i, like you found that to be awed when i started and conducted my initial review.

and we are expecting commissioner kopp to arrive shortly. and before calling for public comment, i want for the record to acknowledge that all

chairman >> yes, commissioner kopp? >> i should like to request an investigation by our staff of the following apparent facts: a committee known commonly as no on d, h, l and m was formed, d, h, l, and m, refer to propositions on the november 8th san francisco ballot. to raise money to defeat each of those measures. the san francisco chronicle reported on or about november 9th that with the mayor's help, and i quote "with lee's help the no on d, h, l and m campaign raised and pend more than $2,200,000 about ten times as much was spent to them of support them." "them" being the ballot measures, d, h, l and m. the second fact is that the person named tony winacker described as a " described as a senior advisor, took a leave of absence from the mayor's office and managed the campaign to defeat all of those four measures. and as quoted as criticizing the san franciscans who were responsible for those being on the ballot including various members of the board of supervisors. i'm informed and believe that mr. winacker isn't r

wendy kopp to the town square they found like a kind of gun, everyone arming, the whole square was full of tables of people so that ammunitions and guns. them from the barbecue towards the court is was interpreted, this is all over the papers, as a black rebellion, a black insurrection which he talked about that phrase, insurrection. >> this is such important information for all of us to know, and i think you both. tell us about clark county and forsyth now. what is it like what don't want to go and visit? you know, i'm not sure. is there any apology to anybody? is there any history about this? i would like to hear from both of you about that. >> so i can answer in the form of, in thinking about my experience, my process of writing the book. in 2011 we had a racial killing in mississippi where white teenagers from brandon, which is now suburban community just outside of jackson went into jackson comment attack a man in the middle of the night, ran him over with a truck, killed in on security cam footage. we have security camera footage of the. the reason i mentioned that, and your descr

. >> it seems like commissioner kopp has not heard a dirty word as a matter of law you're not allowed to stop someone from saying it and quite frankly i don't care about your sensibility you've shown you don't care about any i can raise a legitimate issue and use all the polite terms that i can and been ignored and that's something i've learned from this especially the library commission if it is what it takes that's what it takes. >> if you don't like it - t s. >> thank you and merry christmas to all and happy new year do you hear a motion to adjourn. >> so moved. >> mooeeeting adjourned >> good morning, everyone. this is the tuesday, december, 13, 2016 meeting of the san francisco county transportation authority. my name is eric mar i'm the acting chair of the transportation authority. our clerk is mr. steve stamos, could you please do the roll call? >> item one, avalos? >> here. present. >> breed. >> present. >> campos. >> present. >> cohen npresent. >> ferrill, absent. >> kim? >> absent. mar? >> present. peskin? >> present. tang >> absent. commissioner yee. >> present. >> we have

and we are expecting commissioner kopp to arrive shortly.nd before calling for public comment, i want for the record to acknowledge that all commissioners received a