>> good evening, president koppel, friends, commissioners. the item before you is a congressional review of building applications. to construct three new a.d.u. units within the ground floor of an existing four-story, 12 unit as a dental building. no expansion of the existing building envelope is proposed. the existing building is a historic resource category. there are two d. on requesters. there is -- there are two d.r. requesters. [indiscernible] it diminishes space such as that it is not adequate for car parking. he constitutes last -- loss of housing. and that the inclusion of trash bins in the garage space further reduces the usability of the garage. they want to relocate the garbage and recycling bins and why didn't the garage -- and widen the garage to allow access to the parked cars. the second requester is concerned that the proposed project involves different walls to create open space at the rear of the adjacent property. we will present a danger to their property for ways, drainage, and soil movement. these alternatives are to mo

thank you. >> president koppel: okay. commissioner fung, you're next. >> clerk: i don't know if you want to take it now, but there's another late commenter. i don't know if you want to take it, commissioner fung. >> commissioner fung: okay. >> president koppel: okay. let's let commissioner fung go head, and then we'll take the comment. >> commissioner fung: okay. i have several questions. first question for the development team is, this is a private driveway. and is it intended to be gated? >> no, it's a private driveway, and it will not be gated. if you'd want me to discuss why, i'd be happy to. >> commissioner fung: no, i'm just -- you've answered the question. thank you. my second question is yes, i would have supported permeability across the entire driveway, and as it's already been raised by other commissioners. the third question is how is lighting to be handled on the driveway? is there is one comment in your document, but it doesn't etail that? >> i'll have risa address that again. >> hi. risa, design team. the l

. >> president koppel: commissioner imperial? >> commissioner imperial: move to continue. >> commissioner tanner: second. >> clerk: thank you, commissioners. there is a motion and a second. on the motion -- [roll call] >> clerk: so moved, commissioners. that motion passes unanimously, 7-0 and places us under your consent calendar for one item. all mattered listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are consider today be routine by the planning commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 5, 2020-010157-cua at 1100 vanness avenue. members of the public, this is your opportunity to speak. press star, three to enter the queue, and i see we have one member of the public. as a reminder, you are requesting this item to be taken off the consent

. >> president koppel: commissioner imperial? >> commissioner imperial: move to continue. >> commissioner tanner: second. >> clerk: thank you, commissioners. there is a motion and a second. on the motion -- [roll call] >> clerk: so moved, commissioners. that motion passes unanimously, 7-0 and places us under your consent calendar for one item. all mattered listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are consider today be routine by the planning commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 5, 2020-010157-cua at 1100 vanness avenue. members of the public, this is your opportunity to speak. press star, three to enter the queue, and i see we have one member of the public. as a reminder, you are requesting this item to be taken off the consent

good afternoon, president koppel and members of the commission. linda ajello hoagland, planning department staff. the project, which received approval in 2018, includes horizontal additions at the front and rear of the home and a vertical addition of approximately 7 feet, resulting in a 2,602 square foot home. the project has not changed in terms of its approved size, design, or features. the subject property is located in the noe valley neighborhood. the existing structure was instructed as a single-family home in 1912. in 1915, the house was raised 7 feet, and a concrete foundation basement was poured, and a 4 foot by 12 foot addition was added to the front of the building. as detailed in your packet, the project was originally filed and reviewed in 2018 and 2019. during the neighborhood notification period, no comments in opposition were received. during instruction, additional demolition work that caused the project to exceed the demolition threshold outlined in planning code 317 had occurred. a complaint was filed with the department of plann

commissioner koppel had to leave early.ill be cheering for the remainder of this hearing. we are on the last item of your agenda today. this is a discretionary review. staff, are you prepared to make your presentation? >> i, thank you, jonas. good afternoon. i david winslow, staff architect. the project before you is a request for discretionary review of the building permit application number 2020. to construct a new rear deck on an existing one-story garage on the rear of the lot that faces the alley. the d.r. requester, the adjacent property and the west of the proposed project is considered that the proposed deck will cause privacy and noise impacts to the immediate and adjacent neighbors. there are no other -- there are other decks to the use of the building currently and proposed. the proposed alternative would be to deny the roof deck over the garage. to date, and i want to amend my report, there have been two letters opposing the project. the department's review of this confirms support by locating a deck on the exis

commissioner koppel had to leave early.ill be cheering for the remainder of this hearing. we are on the last item of your agenda today. this is a discretionary review. staff, are you prepared to make your presentation? >> i, thank you, jonas. good afternoon. i david winslow, staff architect. the project before you is a request for discretionary review of the building permit application number 2020. to construct a new rear deck on an existing one-story garage on the rear of the lot that faces the alley. the d.r. requester, the adjacent property and the west of the proposed project is considered that the proposed deck will cause privacy and noise impacts to the immediate and adjacent neighbors. there are no other -- there are other decks to the use of the building currently and proposed. the proposed alternative would be to deny the roof deck over the garage. to date, and i want to amend my report, there have been two letters opposing the project. the department's review of this confirms support by locating a deck on the exis

right now climate change the koppel story. faces watch closely when for just one week. how much oil. we still have time. to subscribe to like. putting shops and not that many mosques sweetens approach to cope at 19 is radically different relied on people taking personal responsibility to contain the virus instead of strict lockdowns. but sweden now has one of the highest transmission rates in europe only its well funded health care system and spanish population have stopped its rocketing to the levels of italy or britain. now still comb has become a haven for young people from other countries as scaping lockdowns. is there anything we can learn from the swedish way. that's a question i lost a doctor of one of europe's largest university hospitals in stockholm in a moment 1st let's take a closer look at how the relaxed swedes have been approaching the pandemic the government has drawn both international praise and criticism for its decision to stay open during the crisis and not all swedes are convinced the country took the right path. at 1st glance this looks like life

susan: here's the thing with the worldwide developers conference, koppel is not just hardware devicete the developers together. it's a big deal. stuart: i had to get to one of those worldwide app store developers. susan: maybe it doesn't work for you. stuart: let's get serious, and major push to re- appeal the 10 top-- 10000 dollars limit on state and local tax. senator schumer reportedly leading the charge to repeal. look who's here, larry kudlow himself. you know, this is what richard democrats want more than anything else, this is chaotic-- pay off for voting and the biden administration, pay us back with that packs cut for rich democratic donors could do you get my point? is going to happen. >> i don't know that it's going to happen. it might happen, but you are correct it's a payoff to big blue state democrats, wealthy democrats. it's so hypocritical, obviously. a democrats say, well, we had too many tax cuts for the rich, the rich don't pay their fair share so they are going to roll out a crazy 3 trillion-dollar tax hike which will decimate the economy next year and in the year