, south kosan, and the ally. i'm a little bit at a loss to understand why because you're an american you would not have covered that story. when we go back to vietnam, there were all kinds of reporters who did indeed go in to hanoi. everybody wanted to go there. why would a reporter say, "i won't cover that because i'm unhappy at what's happening there"? don't you have a higher duty as an american citizen to do all that you can to save the lives of soldiers rather than this journalistic ethic of reporting the fact? no, you don't have the higher duty to-- no, no. you're a reporter. your job is to cover what is going on in that war. people know that americans are getting killed in that war. lord knows it's a hypothetical. i'd get on the horn with peter and say, "what do you mean--" i think he's right. i chickened out. i played the hypothetical hard, but i think he's right. they've got the same problems that downs has. what's the problem, general scowcroft? the problem is the job as opposed to a higher cause. first