talking about what we understand about complexity here is that well, we have limited the rights of kosisthat second device eh how is it a device and glo, well, that’s one story, that is, but all the same, we understand that the consequences of other, so to speak, harmful emissions are no less, and even greater, well, you know, i think, after all, the car does not drive around the office. and this one is correct in 2 m he is sitting 2 meters away to say, look, i understand that freedom of every person well, although it may not be entirely appropriate now, but here is such a stable phraseology every person's freedom ends there it already begins another person's freedom i support the right i support the work of other people i support the right of other people to try to be healthy and not be exposed to passive smoking there but on the other hand let 's talk about alternatives for those who have chosen for themselves to be smokers because i see a lot of restrictions really in the innovations but all i see in the sense of maintaining their right to choose. maybe you think it is a wrong way of l