i tend to agree with judge kozinsky here. has not know that means he five votes in affirmative action cases. >> this is an important distinction. it is one thing to go along because he -- because you know you are outvoted. and you do not have the votes to overrule it, so you do not make an issue of it. votes, you the four would not join that decision. it is a matter of arithmetic. this one?omments on >> i would say something. overturning roe could mean two things. one, there are five votes to have an opinion to overturn roe versus wade, and discontinue planned parenthood. and it is no longer a protected liberty interest. the other way to overturn roe without explicitly doing so is to apply that standard the court announced for determining whether restriction on abortion is constitutional or not, but to uphold every restriction on abortion you come across, thereby effectively rendering roe no longer the law on the ground. that is another way the courts could potentially tip away at roe, if there is an appointment. appointment,

let's go to michelle kozinski at the state department.helle, the nation has ordered a conversational pause. what does that mean? >> this is a chance for every ship throughout the u.s. navy to take at least a day for a very close look at how they're operating. back to basics in how they handle safety procedures. as you said, this is the fourth accident vovinvolving a navy sh just this year, the second most serious one in just two months. ten american sailors are now missing. because these incidents are supposed to be extremely rare, the navy launched this major review of how and why accidents keep happening. the u.s.s. john mccain now in port in singapore with a gaping hole in its side. not a wound of battle to the guided missile destroyer but another navy accident. and a testament to the force of impact with a behemoth slow-moving oil tanker three times its size. as they were moving to the mo more -- morocco strait this morning, ten u.s. sailors unaccounted for, many more hurt. >> there was a collision with the u.s.s. john mccain. we obvi

i tend to agree with judge kozinsky here. um is ana per curi opinion of the justices, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't overturn roe versus wade. >> this is an important distinction. it is one thing to go along because you know you are outvoted or convinced and you do not have the votes to overrule it, so you do not make an issue of it. quite different from saying that if you have the votes you would not join that decision. i'm not saying anything about chief justice roberts, but i think it is a matter of arithmetic. >> other comments on this one? >> i would say something. overturning roe could mean two things. one is there are five votes on the court to write an opinion saying we overturn roe versus wade, and discontinue planned parenthood. the decision to end a pregnancy is no longer a protected liberty interest. the other way to overturn roe without explicitly doing so is to apply that standard the court announced for determining whether restriction on abortion is constitutional or not, but to uphold every restriction on a