, the russians call him kramsky, yes, he too, this is the same st. petersburg academy of arts, he said that he was the son of a scribe and a cossack mother, yes, but he was part of this movement of pilgrims, it was, this, this is a purely russian cultural phenomenon, and they, and they are russian, or of the russian empire, of the russian empires, and they inspired them, inspired populism, isn't that right? part of the uvarov triad, a very interesting question, let 's take a closer look at all these points, if we are talking about the uvarov triad , what exactly are the approaches in this triad, if, if this is orthodoxy, then this elevated attitude towards religion, the spiritual recognition of spiritual primacy, and the fact that the religion has orthodoxy, should create a spiritual, supposedly sanctifying power in russia and the people. autocracy is the absence of any mechanisms of constitutional monarchy and similar things, this is an opposition to any processes that resemble what was happening in france, in holland, in many other countries at tha

about ukrainians, but even now we are talking specifically about these ethnographic moments, so about kramsky, whose painting the mermaid by gogol, also ukrainians in ukrainian embroidered dresses, it showed the identity of the ukrainian people, it showed that it cannot be reduced to one comb over the alleged population of the russian empire not without recognizing these clear national differences, and this was already a danger. territory, that is , it must be understood, it was possible to ban the ukrainian language, it was possible to ban it there to impose restrictions on the theater , a lot could be done, but how do you forbid an artist to paint a still life, how can you forbid an artist to paint a person in an embroidered dress, but look how the empire used it, how the empire used gogol's presentation, as here about the ukrainians, as this tribe sings and... and dances, this is pushkin, in pushkin’s interpretation it was, and yes, but this is such a gogol image, yes, a gogol image, he said about gogol, and here, and here, this same stumbling block , it's actually, it's actually what, it'

they did not quarrel after this address, they were also friends, and it is obvious that what is kramsky'sontribution to the deconstruction of this kremsky was, he raised, the entire history of the russian empire a rebellion in the academy of arts against the depiction of an academic, well, purely academic interpretation of painting. they asked the students to write a poem in valhalla, he said, i don’t want to write all these set things and staged moments in order to show that he led this were, yes, he led it, it was the kremsky leader, and this proves once again , that it was the ukrainians who were the triggers that organized all these riots, all this resistance that was there, all these moments, that is , he, but even more interestingly, who founded the empire? sorry academy, who founded the st. petersburg academy, who were the most influential people? well , one of the most influential first people was anton losenko or antin losenko. you obviously understand that this is hardly a russian, judging by the surname, he is this amazing story, because in ukraine there was a singing, well , a