like rosen, krantz and guildenstern and hamlet, that first adam and eve book had wandered unknowingly into a wider drama. the book's contrary and case implicitly raised a big question if the secular consensus could whitewash the human damage out there in the name of progress, what other critical fallout might it be missing? so this leads us to the book at hand. adam and eve after the pill revisited is a new installment. it's a follow on to the original and a new argument based on a decade worth of related research and writing. its logic is united to the first book by the same claim the desire to understand through empiricism, the fruits of the seeds planted in the 1960s. so. so. the new book widens the aperture to talk about the murkier cosmic fallout from the revolution. it dissects the effects of the revolution on society, politics and church. just needless to add, the foreword by the late great cardinal pell with whom i discussed some of these arguments is the honor of a lifetime. let's look at one area covered in the book the revolution's effects on society. the first thing to und

like rosen, krantz and guildenstern and hamlet, that first adam and eve book had wandered unknowingly into a wider drama. the book's contrary and case implicitly raised a big question if the secular consensus could whitewash the human damage out there in the name of progress, what other critical fallout might it be missing? so this leads us to the book at hand. adam and eve after the pill revisited is a new installment. it's a follow on to the original and a new argument based on a decade worth of related research and writing. its logic is united to the first book by the same claim the desire to understand through empiricism, the fruits of the seeds planted in the 1960s. so. so. the new book widens the aperture to talk about the murkier cosmic fallout from the revolution. it dissects the effects of the revolution on society, politics and church. just needless to add, the foreword by the late great cardinal pell with whom i discussed some of these arguments is the honor of a lifetime. let's look at one area covered in the book the revolution's effects on society. the first thing to und

the mike krantz and republicans appreciate that he slowed down the spending because his idea that the post-covid spending would increase inflation. it was a factor in increasing at but his record as a voting democrat is going to be viewed a lot more positively. but he made a lot of opponents inside the party. that tapered off over time when it became clear that he would not bend if he was protested. he might even move march of the right. he enabled much of the biden agenda. he was a reliable vote for judicial nominees, there is no play for bipartisanship when it comes to the courts. the fact that he was there for high profile votes on brett kavanaugh who he supported an amy coney barrett who he did not. he angered liberal democrats for voting for cavanaugh. he made lots of people unhappy and that was part of his plan and politics. he was never going to vote in lockstep with the party but it's a complicated legacy. economically, he was probabl perceptive incorrect and s policy, that will be sorted out over the years. host: dave weikel political reporter, think you for joining us. we wi

the mike krantz and republicans appreciate that he slowed down the spending because his idea that the post-covid spending would increase inflation. it was a factor in increasing at but his record as a voting democrat is going to be viewed a lot more positively. but he made a lot of opponents inside the party. that tapered off over time when it became clear that he would not bend if he was protested. he might even move march of the right. he enabled much of the biden agenda. he was a reliable vote for judicial nominees, there is no play for bipartisanship when it comes to the courts. the fact that he was there for high profile votes on brett kavanaugh who he supported an amy coney barrett who he did not. he angered liberal democrats for voting for cavanaugh. he made lots of people unhappy and that was part of his plan and politics. he was never going to vote in lockstep with the party but it's a complicated legacy. economically, he was probably perc incorrect and social policy, that will be sorted out over the years. host: ♪ announcer: bucaille broadband supports c-span as a cable prov