. >> in the shadow of the kremlin, a russian policeman waves down another motorist.ssue tickets here. usually they ask for bribes to be paid curbside to supplement their meagher salaries. more than two thirds of russians don't trust their police. >> our police force is totally corrupt. it is a system because those on the lower level there is a food chain and they gather the money and it goes top. >> and a growing wave of public outcry on the internet. along with videos making fun of drunk and abusive policemen are more serious disclosures. alex, a policeman the hundred miles from moscow became an internet sensation when posted this appeal, calling his superiors corrupt and professing he was promoted to major for putting an innocent person in prison. he has since been filed and jailed on what he claims are trumped up charges. this police chief was sentenced to life on friday for a drunken rampage in a supermarket where he killed two and wounded seven. h his commander said at the time he should keep his job because he was a good job. last week, the russian president an

the kremlin, nazis, japanese could never do.did it to ourselves and all the forces that came together over 40 years. >> sean: wasn't that their goal to get america from within? >> that's what happened. >> sean: i make the case, we are going to get into detail here. the idea that the government would tell, first of all they designed the car companies in the country. the government would tell banks and financial institutions that they've got to make risky loans that they know people are never gonna pay back. >> greatest generation the world war ii generation it would never dawn on them to take the type of risk these people did. the people who were the 60s hippies. the people at woodstock in the 60s who became the yuppies of the 80s the barons of the 2000's are the leaders around the country that helped cause this. it really is a remarkable thing. >> sean: that leads us into our next clip. describe what this is? >> the next clip is where we show the mothers that -- the mothers of the 50s. we show their lives. june cleaver, donna re

been revealed over the last years, reagan sought to establish a dialogue with the leadership in the kremlin. to no avail, at least at first, remember there was a succession of soviet leaders who died one after another in the art it is. reagan even said at one point, he told nancy reagan, how can i make peace with these people if they keep dying on the? [laughter] >> he did authorize massive increases in military spending and he stepped up support to anti-communist rebels in places like nicaragua and afghanistan. reagan did so because he sincerely believed that by negotiating from strength impression the russians he could convince him to come to the bargaining table and make peace. and reagan and i think this is critical, had a genuine fear that if things did not change, the superpowers were on a collision course that could in any nuclear war. in 1983, the u.s. not to exercise was mistaken by the club as a preparation for a possible first strike. he was aghast when he was told associates have put their warplanes on combat alert and response or a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fo

and reporters in those days would send written questions to the kremlin and one of them was kings buryth, who was chief correspondent of the hearst newspapers and he sent five questions to stalin and stalin chose to answer those five. and one of the questions was about currency reform. it was currency reform, the fact that we wanted to put in a real currency backed by gold and the full faith and credit and that was the last thing the soviets wanted. they wanted economic chaos so they could take over these countries. and in the answers to smith, stalin never mentioned currency and dean acheson, who also had been against the airlift, noticed that. and then at the u.n. the u.s. ambassador phillip jessup approached the russian ambassador and asked "was that intentional?" he said "i don't know, i'll ask." and came back that stalin had intentionally not mentioned currency reform. so now there was no reason for the airlift. and also he realized west germany had been formed, we formed nato because of the airlift, it was formed during the airlift. that the last thing the russians wanted was a m

. >> se graba en un celular esa enorme pirÁmide sobre el kremlin.2003. mide mÁs de 50 m por lado y fue vista acerca de santa fe, es de color gris. otra pirÁmide fue vista en mayo del 2009 en la ciudad de mÉxico. tambiÉn hay otra muy similar que fue grabada en southampton, muy similar a la de moscÚ. >> desafortunadamente se nos acaba el tiempo. son imÁgenes que llaman la atenciÓn y nos ponen a dudar en estos fenÓmenos. gracias. >> gracias a ti. >> vamos a una pausa. mÁs adelante un tema que está en el ojo mundial, las compaÑÍas automotrices estÁn en la mirilla. rta am aá¿cÓ evita wóneñkh@spiertericaáh@icaáh@áád? ♪ ♪ despierta amÉrica ♪ >> buenos dÍas. es miÉrcoles 10 de febrerde 2010. estamos contentos. nos acompaÑa la modelo rosana martÍnez. >> ¿de que parte de argentina eres? >> de buenos aires. hace nueve aÑos que vivo en el d.f. >> ¿te da miedo lo que sucede en el d.f.?h@áádespierta americ@ y que estÉ pasando esto, estos problemas con el narcotrÁfico. >> imagÍnate nosotros como mexicanos. cambiando el tema, te das cuenta de muchos niÑos que estÁn

that american reporters would constantly send written questions to the kremlin in the hope that stalin had something to say. a man named kingsbury smith, who was the chief foreign correspondent of the hearst news service had sent questions to stalin. and stalin chose to answer those five questions. no wine reticular teen ashes and was the first one who understood what one of stalin's answers meant. what was asked about berlin, the airlift was still going on. forty was asked about berlin, he did not mention currency reform, which after all was the stated reason for the blockade. ashes than went to truman and told them that and they then decided that that blood in his weekly press conferences would mention that stalin was very interesting, that was the open parts. the behind-the-scenes part was that our delegation to the u.n. would ask their delegation was the omission of currency reform deliberate? and two weeks later, malik came back and said yes, it was. and then the question was, the next question was, is your leader open to solving this problem at this time? and the answer came back

. >> who had been summoned to the kremlin by putin and to be asked how he could marshalling in the new world? he said why don't you give me four of your brightest girls, and i will bring them home to wellesley? i think this is the kind of experience he might been thinking. i was wondering about the fellows. are they ultimately thinking 10-15 years so that one day they will be in a seat like dr. albright is sitting? >> yes. >> you should have an answer for that down here, i think. >> you have to go to wellesley to be secretary of state. [laughter] >> yes. >> so i am it actually thinking of becoming an academic. not secretary of state, but who knows? my question -- you all mentioned the role of academia and facilitating global engagement among students and engaging other academics and cooperation. do you think the current system of tenure in the united states is hampering or enhancing the possibility of academics to do that? >> good question. [laughter] >> no president up here is going to say -- [laughter] >> we could talk to you privately afterwards. >> i think certainly president bolli

. >> [unintelligible] who had been summoned to the kremlin by potent and to ask help couldn't -- by putin to be asked how he could marshalling in the new world? he said why don't you give me four of your brightest girls, and i will bring them home to wellesley? i think this is the kind of experience he might been thinking. your ultimately thinking 10 or 15 years, said they will eventually be in a seat like dr. albright is sitting? >> [unintelligible] [laughter] >> you should have an answer for this. >> you have to go to wellesley to be secretary of state. [laughter] >> yes. >> so i am it actually thinking of becoming an academic. not secretary of state, but who knows? my question -- you all mentioned the role of academia and facilitating global engagement among students and engaging other academics and cooperation. do you think the current system of tenure in the united states is hampering or enhancing the possibility academics to do that? >> good question. [laughter] >> no president appear is going to say -- [laughter] >> we could talk to you privately afterwards. >> i > >bollinger -- i

one called him a dupe of the kremlin, and another compared him to neville chamberlain.son there -- you look at nixon and reagan -- at some point you have to ignore the criticism from within your party. guest: sometimes that is the case. by blocking the base of their party, they engaged in what were very important diplomatic initiatives. host: long island, anthony on the democrats' line. caller: it seems to me that governments have always define themselves by selling protection to their citizenry. after the collapse of the soviet union, it seems as though the united states was in great need of a new bogyman. what happened to the peace dividend? i believe that was all clinton was able to balance the budget, and the fact that they were able to cut defense spending. it seems as though now we have squandered the dividend to such -- we are collapsing ourselves now because of all of this. it seems as though there is no end in sight in this barrage of agencies and bureaucracies selling as protection, nsa, cia, fbi, navy, army, coast guard, and now homeland security. they all po

one called him a dupe of the kremlin, and another compared him to neville chamberlain. lesson there -- you look at nixon and reagan -- at some point you have to ignore the criticism from within your party. guest: sometimes that is the case. by blocking the base of their party, they engaged in what were very important diplomatic initiatives. host: long island, anthony on the democrats' line. caller: it seems to me that governments have always define themselves by selling protection to their citizenry. after the collapse of the soviet union, it seems as though the united states was in great need of a new bogyman. what happened to the peace dividend? i believe that was all clinton was able to balance the budget, and the fact that they were able to cut defense spending. it seems as though now we have squandered the dividend to such -- we are collapsing ourselves now because of all of this. it seems as though there is no end in sight in this barrage of agencies and bureaucracies selling as protection, nsa, cia, fbi, navy, army, coast guard, and now homeland security. they al