the ucsf medical center included a comprehensive assessment from an outside vendor by the name of kroll. they outlined the numerous information system electronic lock systems that are required in order to bring sfgh up to the standards that are required for effective security system. the costs for those items have been included in our dph budget that's been presented to you previously. and that is a quick review of the summary findings and i'm happy to take questions now or after the sheriff. however you'd like to do that. >> perhaps we can have the sheriff make his presentation so that it would complete our picture. and we thank the sheriff for being present here. >> thank you honorable commissioners, greatly appreciate the opportunity to be before you today and our staff from the sheriff's department . first, i really want to give praise to the department of public health, san francisco general hospital, and its wide network of staff. before i was sheriff, as many of you know, i was a member of the board of supervisors. seven year i spent on the budget committee so that gives you an i

kroll. there's going to be an adjustment in how marijuana is mr.ted by employers, as markus had addressed. it will be legalized by the state, but possibly barred by employers. what might you know about issues relating to the liability? elliott? guest: so, to clarify, the testing rules that are being impermanent in colorado right now are obligations that the marijuana businesses have to ensure public safety to their customers. first of all, they are having to test for potency. that is already required. the piece that is coming out is turned to launch on july 1. it is about testing for harmful contaminants. mold, mildew, residual solvents. there's more on that list. er's question about drug testing for employers and employees and this whole issue about driving an impaired is a really tricky issue. many people have wanted -- we are all trying to regulate marijuana like alcohol. but with drug testing, it becomes more tricky. i am an attorney, not a scientist. i will play the little i know. witho

kroll. there's going to be an adjustment in how marijuana is mr.ted by employers, as markus had addressed. it will be legalized by the state, but possibly barred by employers. what might you know about issues relating to the liability? elliott? guest: so, to clarify, the testing rules that are being impermanent in colorado right now are obligations that the marijuana businesses have to ensure public safety to their customers. first of all, they are having to test for potency. that is already required. the piece that is coming out is turned to launch on july 1. it is about testing for harmful contaminants. mold, mildew, residual solvents. there's more on that list. er's question about drug testing for employers and employees and this whole issue about driving an impaired is a really tricky issue. many people have wanted -- we are all trying to regulate marijuana like alcohol. but with drug testing, it becomes more tricky. i am an attorney, not a scientist. i will play the little i know. witho