what explains paul krugman?nk more dangerous than the ludicrous idea of 70% -- let's go out and make america the highest tax rate in the world, that will make us competitive. another idea that has caught on with the left in a bigger way is move to 100% renewable energy. we're going to try to energize a 20 trillion dollars american economy with windmills? it is really such a stupid idea. and yet most liberals totally agree with her on that. >> steve -- >> republicans are going to lose -- they are already losing on this issue in my opinion. because what are they criticizing aoc for? 70%. that's too high. it would never work. their criticism is the tax is too high, to expensive but she gets the moral high ground. she gets to say wouldn't it be wonderful if everyone could get free college, free healthcare, all these things. this idea that what you earn is not yours and that if you make a lot of money, it is government's role to redistribute it. the republicans used to be against that. and if they want to counter aoc

so paul krugman is saying this, a guy that knows the economy more than anybody. >> right. >> and he isthis could actually work, a 70% tax rate on people that make over $10 million. >> it's -- she says if you think that's radical, call me a radical. and you know what? there have been reports that have been done that say this can actually contribute 10s of millions, almost -- trillions, almost $73 trillion over ten years to our bottom line if it actually gets implemented. the concern is, a, i think it actually can work, but b, the concern is that those people will actually change their behavior. that's the downside of it. so the question is can you actually collect all of the money you think you are from the taxes. >> you know, i want to applaud the congresswoman, because she has an idea, a really good idea, a green new deal, and she's putting out a plan of how to pay for it. we saw a tax cut that that, among other things has taken our deficit up $2 trillion. the president never put out a plan to how he would pay for the tax cut that he got through. here you have a woman on her basically

i don't think he's forgiven me for that but krugman has run connections he is made that is life and theprize in economics which tells you about the [inaudible] you predicted literally moments before the stock market went up next to the point in the stock market would never recover he said trump would cause great depression and we have a booming economy for the last two years and go back to the 80s he was the one economist remember inflation file under paul volcker and reagan in the early '80s he was one who said it's a temporary blip and will see a continued rise in inflation and low inflation ever since. the most important thing is he was calling me out a liar because i said we have deflation in the economy right now and i want to stick by that. if you look at what happened to commodity prices over the last six months they have fallen precipitously, not just gold, silver, copper, metals, food, soybeans, everything is falling and that's a sign of deflation and it's by the fed is wrecking the economy. david: just got to put one point. gold is up. gold has been up significantly just as a

yes, i said, they are lying to the american people including paul krugman.: now, i will say i do take issue with members the trump administration who keep filling the need to chime in moments ago. kevin hassett kind of bragged about apple's warning. there will be more american companies will have a warning. you're winning. you don't need to layer it at all, makes you sound like first of all, you don't have a heart and secondly you can blow it? >> i would agree. i agree they should stop chiming in on every little nugget and news bit. i tell you when i make my judgment relative to the china-u.s. relations, march 1st. didn't the president said to the president of china, the president of china said give me three months. they're still working out the details. this is not a simplistic issue or a simplistic set of issues we're dealing with. they are very complex. i agree, the white house should just be quiet and the investors that get nervous, they simply shut wait until march 1st. then we can evaluate whether or not we have a deal from china. charles: invite me to

jared, your reaction to paul krugman's points with where we might be headed with the economy and what tariffs might be doing to nudge us there. >> i'm in full agreement with paul's assessment there. in fact, one of the things i've been writing a lot about lately is as the fiscal stimulus from the tax cuts and some of the deficit spending that the last congress did begin to fade later this year. growth is going to settle back down to its earlier trend rate just as paul said there. eventually, that's going to lead to slower job growth and higher unemployment. for now, just to be clear, the economy and the job market in particular is still in a solid place. but, you know, the stock market is forward looking, and it is recording the fact that trump's tariffs are definitely hurting sales of some of our key companies. apple was off 10% its stock price today. that's a remarkable drop. and it's not every day that we can point to a reason why the stock market contracted as much as it did, over 600 points on the dow. this is clearly a function of the tariffs. and you explained -- you did a grea

since then, they helped other families and children with life limiting conditions by the charlie krugman foundation. he had three cardiac arrests in one day. after an unsuccessful operation he's fighting for his life in need of a heart transplant. only given a matter of weeks to live. will the primus to join me to find a heart for little carter. >> prime minister. >> commending the work they have done with the cookson foundation. and threatening conditions and the whole house is with the family at this difficult time and outlined specifics of the case but what i will do is ensure the relevant minister, health and social care meets the honorable lady to discuss this further. we want to change the donations to save small lives which was why we plan to introduce a new system from england from 2020 and the new law in honor of max johnson who received a heart and lost her life in a car accident but it is a tragic case the honorable lady outlined for the minister of the department speaking to her about it. >> order. have been watching prime minister's questions from the british house of common

paul krugman went on a tweet storm against schultz saying nobody wants him. how can he say that when there has been no polling on him. >> i think one of the things some on the left in the democratic party fear is even if he's unsuccessful as a candidate, he will highlight their weaknesses, their message. you heard it. can we afford free healthcare for everybody. do you want your private insurance policy canceled? free college? but candidate who lays out a message like that might make it difficult for the left wing of the democratic party. liz: howard schultz is talking common sense. that's the middle. all the left-wing candidates, they like tax and spending which is medicare for all which is really single payer. this is even to the left of what china does. but along comes howard schultz who says single payer is so bad, you can't aforward it. california didn't do it because it would bankrupt. vermont, colorado said no. but people like free stuff and somehow the narrative got out there that it's actually free when it isn't. >> thel kamala harris was asked a que

and contrary to what economic, mean girl paul krugman might have you believe, a moderately protractedwn is not a libertarian utopia, because we all know the second it's over it's back to business as usual. it's like quitting the gym in the middle of january, and once we're back up and running, well -- grunting, it will be the equivalent of political man boobs. there are lessons within the shutdown that illustrate the power of both privatization and the free market. canada used to be the bastion of polite socialism, but in an unexpected freedom shift they had this beat in a few liberty areas, and not just with rand paul's hernia surgery. yes, they have federally legal cannabis, but they also have a privatized air traffic control system that is the envy of the western world. in fact, they've been delivering our furloughed controllers pity pizza, thumbing their noses at our stalled innovation and outdated systems. the tsa, speaking of flying, is getting a thorough once over, and it's obvious a blanket sick-out could be disastrous for travelers but great for liberty proponents who could u

i think krugman uses that so i guess that's fair game. not sure exactly she understands what she's talking about because i get so confused when she opens her mouth these days, because is she talking about like the old sweden which is not really trying to be sweden anymore, or is it the new sweden, the sweden of, say, 2020, because even though like you mentioned, you touched on it, the economic policies in sweden are changing, as you talked about with sara. they have privatized social security. they have a massive privatization when it comes to medicare. there's things that i think aoc talks about that really maybe aren't things that she thinks sweden is all about. trish: i get it. sometimes i think she's a little bit naive and needs to be exposed to the world a little bit more, maybe do a little more reading and a little more traveling and come back with some more informed thoughts. anyway, it's so good to see you. sorry we have to run. i want to get to this other story. this is a woman-to-woman one. sara is still here with me. >>> big ne