paul solman: krugman not only made a good living. various administrations on economic policy. advice taken? paul krugman: the thing that i have learned in real life is that, no matter how much you know, no matter how right you have been, your ability to actually influence policy is very, very limited. i mean, if you ask, how many times has somebody with actual power actually taken advice that i gave them, the answer is once my whole life. paul solman: what are you least proud of? paul krugman: i think maybe the thing i'm least proud of is that i missed one of the important problems of globalization. i thought it was on the whole a good thing, but that it would be problematic. but what i missed was the way that the impact would be concentrated on particular communities. so we can look and say that the china shock displaced maybe one or two million u.s. manufacturing workers. a million-and-a-half people are laid off every month, so what's that? but what i missed was that there would be individual towns that would be in the path of this

krugman left the times just before donald trump was inaugurated.s changed in 25 years. >> when i began writing the column, people were extremely optimistic. i was hired basically to talk about all the good news and maybe funny stuff that was happening in this glorious late 1990's economic boom. and it's been a very troubled world since then. paul: by trouble, at least domestically, he means donald trump's policies. but americans voted for them, didn't they? >> most voters have very little idea of policy. mean, you look at the polling, ask people, do you approve of obamacare? and it's still pretty negative. and you ask, do you approve of the affordable care act? and it's very positive. so that's telling you something about what voters understand about policy. paul: krugman pointed to this recent michigan consumer confidence survey question. >> are you personally better off than you were five years ago? in october, a clear plurality of americans said, no, we're worse off. in november, a clear plurality of americans said, yes, we're better off than we

we turn to nobel prize winning economist paul krugman.ack newsletter paul krugman, and is known for much of his economic work and writing over the last several decades. he's also, we should mention, written textbooks about international trade, international trade theory, and policy. with all due respect, professor, we don't see that cover on the news every night, but it's certainly in the news. welcome back. >> hi, there. >> hi. explain to us why this is happening, why these tariffs as a proposal seem to have run into a lot of headwinds. was that obvious? was that going to be understandable? and where do we go from here? >> well, it was. >> obviously going. >> to. go run into a lot. >> of problems. i mean, first thing to say. >> is, i mean, i'm not a lawyer. but the tariffs look. >> illegal to me. >> i mean, they. they trump. >> invoked a emergency economic powers. and you know, we don't have an economic emergency. we have low. unemployment and low inflation. >> what what's. >> what's this about. and it's. >> also supposed. >> to be used

paul krugman, on. what donald trump's. >> new. >> tariff means for you. >> prices could go up somewhat short term, but prices will also go down. >> when all in starts. >> right now. >> good evening. from new york. >> i'm chris hayes. today we are seeing the most significant act of principled defiance. >> against donald trump's lawlessness since. >> he retook. >> the oval office. >> it all. >> kicked off when donald. >> trump's own acting. >> u.s. attorney for the southern district, appointed by trump. for new york. >> resigned after less. >> than just a month on the job. her name is danielle sassoon. >> you see. >> her there? >> she stepped. >> down this. afternoon after. >> trump's department of. >> justice ordered. >> her to drop the federal government's corruption case. >> against new york city's. >> democratic mayor, eric adams, something she refused. >> to do. >> and to be clear. >> about the. >> context here, says. >> it is not. >> a what you. >> would call a resistance liberal. she was appointed

>> paul krugman, thank you so much for your time tonight, sir. thank you.me as donald trump's own appointees openly defy him, what it means for his already diminishing political strength ahead. >> this one goes. better with the walls. >> this is so much easier than the home improvement store. >> so which would you recommend? >> do you like brown? >> hay? >> yeah. >> some things. >> are just better at. >> home. with empire's home floor advantage, you can compare samples in your own space. plus. >> i'll be here to help you with every step. >> of the process. >> do you remember trying to figure out pricing and installation? >> there's the. >> measurement fee, delivery. >> fee. >> restocking fee. >> convenience fee. >> and installation. >> oh, no. >> no. >> that's not my department. >> we have. >> clear all. inclusive pricing. >> no surprises. and installation is on your schedule. it could even be installed tomorrow. >> call or visit empire today.com and get the home floor advantage. >> it really. >> is better at home. >> 805 82 300. >> empire. today. >> you wh

we have fought and died alongside you the nobel prize winning economist paul krugman, writing on social media, asked why president trump had hit canada more than twice as hard as china, a country trump used to demonize. i can't think of a reason punishing canada, canada with tariffs, let alone treating our neighbor far more harshly than trump is treating china is in the national interest, he wrote. one of the most surprising things is oil and energy coming in from canada is included in the list of tariffed goods, although at a lesser level. as recently as last thursday, president trump said oil would not be included. and then, as you point out, canada responded with its own targeted tariffs against america, particularly agricultural products chicken, pork, wheat, barley, tobacco and wine. canada is t the wine industry's biggest export market, $1 billion a year in industry group representing the california wine industry points out. the alcoholic beverage industry was already struggling. unprecedented challenges in the marketplace, they call it, and the tariffs will be particularly diffic

we know from hamilton to paul krugman that tariffs work for infant industries and important national industries. but who thinks we need tariffs for corona beer? who thinks we need tariffs for vegetables? here's what we get from mexico. we get 85% of our strawberries from mexico. donald trump put a 25% tariff on it. we get 86% of our tomatoes from mexico, donald trump put a 25% tariff on it. ... we gets 69% of vegetable imports from mexico. 90% of our avocados from mexico. donald trump put a 25% tariff on it. so much for lowering grocery prices, mr. trump. you want americans to pay 25% more for their avocados, their strawberries, their beer. and what world does this economic nonsense make any logical sense? and then you caved to the president of mexico, caved to prime minister trudeau because you saw the stock market dip. how about you stop paying attention to the stock market and start paying attention to people's grocery bills? we are in dangerous times where we have a president who could impose these tariffs on food at any moment. that's why retailers are already raising prices. th

the nobel prize winning economist paul krugman, writing on social media, asked why trump had hit canada, one of our closest allies, twice as hard, more than twice as hard as china, a country he used to demonize. i can't think of a reason, he wrote for punishing canada with tariffs, let alone treating our neighbor far more harshly than trump is treating. china is in the national interest. wall street journal's conservative editorial board ran the headline the dumbest trade war in history. president definitely noticed that one. the other surprise is there's no carveout for tariffs of food. you may recall candidate trump said he would bring grocery prices down. now we're going to be fine just paying more. and the effect on american workers who, for instance, see their car factories shut down because of a lack of parts is going to be far more serious than whether or not you can afford guacamole. but we're going to pay more at the grocery store. the other thing is, we're waiting for mexico and canada to put tariffs on our goods. we'll talk more about that as we talk politics. but that could

the nobel prize winning economist paul krugman, writing on social media, asked why trump had hit canadaof our absolut closest allies, more than twice as hard than china, a country that the president tends to demonize. i can't think of a reason punishing canada with tariffs, let alone treating our neighbor far more harshly than trump is treating china, is in the national interest. the wall street journal's conservative editorial board ran the headline dumbest trade war ever in history. the president absolutely noticed that one. the other surprise is there's no carveout for tariffs in food. you may recall canada. trump said he was going to bring grocery prices down quickly. so we're going to pay more. and but i really want to, you know, emphasize it's going to be the effect on american workers who say, see their car factories shut down because of a lack of parts. that is going to have a much tougher time affording groceries than we're, you know, the rest of us will have affording guacamole. it is unfortunate to pay more at the grocery store or anywhere else, but it is the real effect on t

. >> krugman good evening. my name is devin krugman. i am the executive director of content teams within curriculum and instruction. so prior to getting into the strategic actions that we're going to highlight tonight as we normally do, we wanted to start with our theory of action that organizes those strategic actions. the theory of action i think is actually best read from the right to the left as we want to make sure that we're shifting the behavior and practices of adults in service of our student outcome goals. and so as we highlight strategic changes with curriculum, with instructional practice, with coaching and with site supervision, they are in service of changing adult behaviors for that student impact. next slide please. so as previously mentioned as we await the mid-year star assessment which occurs in february, we have engaged in curriculum and instruction in robust data collection in order to benchmark our progress of implementation while waiting for student outcome data in the mid-year. the first of that is engaging in le