kryc. >> i am going to use the overhead. commissioners, thank you for your time. i am kelly kryc. i am speaking on behalf of the owners of the prort

kryc. >> i am going to use the overhead. commissioners, thank you for your time. i am kelly kryc.

kryc. >> i am going to use the overhead. commissioners, thank you for your time. i am kelly kryc. i am speaking on behalf of the owners of the properties in question. i am going to orient you to the lots in question at this time. here you can see mullen avenue and the two subject properties. this is 260 and this is 264. 260 is a split level home. 264 is a single story 457 square foot home. as you can see in this depiction, the existing lot configuration has the lot line bisecting my structure, a good portion of the square footage, and a small portion of the structure at 264. furthermore, all of the open space belongs to this lot at 260. there is an existing fence. there is an existing fence. i would like to state that the

kryc. >> i am going to use the overhead. commissioners, thank you for your time. i am kelly kryc. i am speaking on behalf of the owners of the properties in question. i am going to orient you to the lots in question at this time. here you can see mullen avenue and the two subject properties. this is 260 and this is 264. 260 is a split level home. 264 is a single story 457 square foot home. as you can see in this depiction, the existing lot configuration has the lot line bisecting my structure, a good portion of the square footage, and a small portion of the structure at 264. furthermore, all of the open space belongs to this lot at 260. there is an existing fence. i would like to state that the appellate lives here, across the street. we do not share a property line. you can see there has been extensive development on the other lot, here. our proposal is to adjust the lot line at 90 degrees, to come into compliance more with the city code and better reflect the living "-- living conditions of the two structures. again, we are proposing to reorient the line. you can see a variance

kryc. >> i am going to use the overhead. commissioners, thank you for your time. i am kelly kryc. i am speaking on behalf of the owners of the properties in question. i am going to orient you to the lots in question at this time. here you can see mullen avenue and the two subject properties. this is 260 and this is 264. 260 is a split level home.

kryc. >> good evening. i am going to speak on behalf of kelly kryc for her rebuttal time. i am with a law firm. we existed the owners of the property -- assisted the owners of the property in the supplement with the neighbors. they asked me to be here tonight and i agreed. i wanted to speak briefly to this issue of adding conditions that would preclude any future development on the property. i do not believe that the board could lawfully imposed such conditions, -- impose such conditions, given the evidence before you tonight. and the condition added to -- any condition added to a variance has to be consistent with the general plan. it cannot be unreasonable or arbitrary and there has to be substantial evidence for imposing it. if i can get the overhead, please. what you can see here is that these existing properties are developed less than their neighbors. they are developed less than is allowed under the planning code. you have single-story buildings where you are allowed to have buildings that could go up to three floors. you can see the property is immediately adjacent

calling item 10, thomas ballinger versus the zoning administrator, protesting the granting to kelly kryc up a lot variants adjusting a property line between two single-family homes to follow an existing were defense -- existing wood fence. mr. ballinger, you have seven minutes. >> i am a resident at 285 mullen avenue, across the street from the lots in question. i was unable to attend the variance hearing. i sent a letter with my objections to that hearing. i believe the variance was granted without attention to the demerits of redrawing these property lines. these small buildings across the street from me were formally outbuildings of a larger victorian house that were split off from the property about 25 years ago. they were evidently garages, because there are three curb cuts that remain, facing the two buildings. perhaps 30 or 40 years ago, they were converted into small residences and have been taken care of and rented out for all the years i have been there, which is 35 years. the proposal to redraw the lot lines makes sense for the new owners. they have a common agreement and can