and the choice of whom to take an example from is, of course, a personal matter for everyone only kuchma yesany ukrainian politicians. after him, they did not remember or did not want to remember that the traditions of russian statehood have a long history, and ukrainian statehood first appeared during the years of the civil war in the form created by the bolsheviks of the ukrainian ssr. two short experiences of hetman bogdan khmelnytsky which in 1654 became part of the russian kingdom and the bourgeois ukrainian people's republic, which existed in the 20th century with interruptions for less than three years. they can hardly be considered a serious basis for their own statehood after the collapse of the soviet union , ukraine did not abandon the legacy of the ussr for a long time and lived according to its laws . ukraine adopted its own constitution only in 1996, 5 years after gaining independence, later than all the former soviet republics true, not having managed to properly build their own state, the ukrainian political top. immediately began to destroy his life according to the law turn

and the choice of whom to take an example from is, of course, a personal matter for everyone only kuchma yes

and the choice of whom to take an example from is, of course, a personal matter for everyone only kuchma yes, and many ukrainian politicians. after him, they did not remember or did not want to remember that the traditions of russian statehood have a long history, and ukrainian statehood first appeared during the years of the civil war in the form created by the bolsheviks of the ukrainian ssr. two short experiences of hetman bogdan khmelnytsky which in 1654 became part of the russian kingdom and the bourgeois ukrainian people's republic, which existed in the 20th century with interruptions for less than three years. they can hardly be considered a serious basis for their own statehood after the collapse of the soviet union , ukraine did not abandon the legacy of the ussr for a long time and lived according to its laws . ukraine adopted its own constitution only in 1996, 5 years after gaining independence, later than all the former soviet republics true, not having managed to properly build their own state, the ukrainian political top. immediately began to destroy his life according to the l

and the choice of whom to take an example from is, of course, a personal matter for everyone only kuchma yes, and many ukrainian politicians. after him, they did not remember or did not want to. remember that the traditions of russian statehood have a long history, and the ukrainian one first appeared during the years of the civil war in the form created by the bolsheviks of the ukrainian ssr. two short experiences of hetman bogdan khmelnytsky which in 1654 became part of the russian kingdom. and the bourgeois ukrainian people's republic, which existed in the 20th century with interruptions for less than three years. they can hardly be considered a serious basis for their own statehood after the collapse of the soviet union , ukraine did not abandon the legacy of the ussr for a long time and lived according to its laws . ukraine adopted its own constitution only in 1996, 5 years after gaining independence, later than all the former soviet republics true, not having managed to properly build their own state, the ukrainian political top. immediately began to destroy his life according to the l

it's just that the documents are already facts and then kuchma said. well, yes, it happens.at ukrainian leaders have always been cynics and liars. no one doubts this exactly, more than ever. to be honest, we did not doubt the pragmatism of the hypocrisy and duplicity of the so-called collective west as evidence that they were not very upset because of zelensky's lies. we just listened. it was the chief of the pentagon who said, let's go to the end in moscow to finish off the supply of weapons, and it also became known that the same burns is the head of the cia, which was previously in anchor. i met with our naryshkin and allegedly it was about the escalation of the settlement. after ankara and naryshkin, he went to ukraine in kiev, met zelensky and said that the americans would not leave you. we are preparing a new military before. what else needs to be proven? bird new season sunday 18:00 on the russia channel unrealistically delicious ice cream discounts, look, push for 209 rubles. wow, even the cream lasts for only 399 and even the fragrance for 1.599. my ex is calling wi

kuchma i think he moved a little closer to the time. yesas 2004 and the cancer had already started fra. kuchma was still there, so the only thing there, if there is a reservation, then only by the date of 2006 of the vase everything that happened to you is clear, but personally, i was interested in hearing johnson because i knew, i thought, personally, as a person, i considered him criminal. i thought that he had blood on his hands, because it was he who came to ukraine to meet zelensky and said that everything should be decided on the battlefield. it was all this, all of us we were all witnesses , now he simply named it, and the reason is the investigative connection. but the only thing. he said that it is we, that is, not only him, yes. well, we understand who is second. yes, it is clear that this is the united states of america, that is, at this point , you understand, i would like to, you are not talking for the first time. here is europe and not there, here they don’t have this is not. i would. you didn’t fight for europe, you say ever

ideas, plum, he has some old agreement, yes, he does not pay attention to this, this is the person who opposed everyone agreed on the name of the dolphin and kuchmae 1990s. it’s not even worth trying. my agreement with him is putin’s blood. when she still remains the dictator of russia , it’s only putin. who decides what i am i think that er president zelensky principle quite rightly said er that er with putin that it would be better to agree with the next er leader russia can be found romantically so say that well this is how it is the same gel and how do you assess the prospects of what in russia will have a new president in the foreseeable future, well, as i said , you can't stay in power, and his dictatorship is personal, it 's a kleotic dictatorship, and it 's a system that can't stay after him , there's a soft transition period how it was after stalin and after the lie well, probably for a long time i think that this uh-uh system of kutin uh-uh is collapsing like uh-uh the ussr in august of 91. what do you think what will the collapsed system look like? someone is removing putin , i can't say who. well, somehow, something is happening to hi

kuchmas, and so on. that's why we are called the stump of a log if we were to build a national state. yes, but on the other hand, we understand what exactly the peasantry probably made up well, how in the western lands of ukraine, which were part of the austro-hungarian empire, they said a little disparagingly about ukrainians that it was a nation of half a dozen. and the same can be said about the then russian territories of ukraine. which took place in the 17th year, where the powers of the central council were actually confirmed. it was primarily a congress of peasants, and then the peasants even left their fields in order to come to kyiv and take part in the creation of their representative body of the i actually, this is this genocide. it is obvious that he did not allow ukrainians to form a powerful national elite. one of its consequences is these documents, which lesya mentioned in part, and their significance is more uh, they talk about how successfully that regime connected this the question of bread in the sagotivla about such earthly things with such constitutional fundamental

, just 200 did not get away from it at all. 22,000 balloons were involved there, yes, this was back in the days of kuchmaresonance is very wide and, of course, a lot of versions are being discussed, including, of course, the american version that this uh incident was needed in order to activate the subject of the russian threat in united states, what was done yesterday was a big american surge, as if all the tv channels interrupted the broadcast and they said that russia attacked nato and so on. that is, uh, they caught up with fear, they are pretty cool uh, and many tied up. this is due to the fact that, in fact, in the united states now it is necessary to push through a new package of assistance to ukraine . before it's too late, plus today rammstein, er, this is a collection of states that provides military assistance to ukraine. that is, just in time. everything seems to match. and yesterday about this e spoke. on fox new channel there is a gabart and a fan of mcgregor listen the american people are experiencing financial difficulties literally everything has risen in price and this is directly relat

as a result, kuchma himself fell as a result of the maidan and the construction of civil society, and the military gave us the national idea. actions with russia. actually. yesagree with our opponents, er, who are just confused. it seems to me at 300, and when ukraine was more or less enough, or rather, little russia, if we take the russian empire. yes, it was as part of the russian empire that it developed and received both industry and developed agriculture. the soviet union when is really right. here the vests were said to be slaughtered to ukraine, this is not up to a few, the krivoy rog republic and novorossia. today nikolaev and kherson and we are mariupol and yet. let me finish, and nevertheless we will talk about the fact that it was then in ukraine that there was calm there, when ukraine was ukrainian patron ukraine in the sky, when ukraine was russia let's count. let's study the history of the materiel there either a ruin, a ruin, a civil war. ah, the reunification of ukrainians with russia, either there is a civil war petlyura and there are thousands of victims of skoropadsky, the holocaust, which petlyura produced the same, or this is the german