two years now to be exact, they first demanded the dismissal of the head of state cinema, maryna kuderchukompetent, but then many people agree that nothing will change with that, with this dismissal, even if it happens, because, let's say, maryna kuderchuk almost does not solve anything. and according to rumors, you know, all the processes are somehow managed by andrii yermak, because this happens in many other areas as well, and therefore we have to put up with the fact that now there is a greater emphasis on the support of commercial cinema and on the support of the television product, i.e. funding for state funding, in particular claims many tv people, our colleagues who make tv series. which make documentary television publicity, not documentary film that can be presented at various film festivals. now you can see excerpts from the contests that took place at the state cinema, these contests, i think, are the most scandalous in the entire history of the contest, this is the 19th pitching of the state agency for cinema affairs, and...

you are with us, if you watch our broadcasts , the state cinema, since the 19th year, when maryna kuderchuke to manage it, has been exposed to constant criticism not only from the film community, but also from a wider audience, when the attacks of the state cinema on the dovzhenka center began, well, i did not expect that this scandal would go so far beyond the cinema bubble, and they will start people who, in principle, have never been interested in ukrainian cinema, especially, or the dovzhenko center, are outraged by all this, and now we have a situation with the council for the support of cinema, as i said at the beginning on... the program is a council, it is a body , which determines which films will win, which films will receive government funding, and accordingly, which films we can watch. we will be able to see in a year, two or three. andriy kotlyar is in direct contact with us, producer. andrew, can you hear me? congratulations. yes, i hear well. well, this is our song beautiful new we constantly talk about this on our broadcast, and about, in particular, this letter is, yes, ano

you are with us, if you watch our broadcasts, then state cinema since the 19th year, when maryna kuderchukanage there, she was exposed to constant criticism not only from the film community, but from a wider audience, and when the attacks of the state cinema on the dovzhenka center began, then... well, i did not expect that this scandal would go so far outside the film bubble and they would start to be outraged by it to everyone , people who were never interested in ukrainian cinema, especially, or the dovzhenko center, and now we have a situation with the film support council, as i said at the beginning of our program, this is a council, this is a body that determines which tapes will win which the tapes will receive state funding, and accordingly, what films we can watch, we will be able to watch in a year, two or three years, and andriy kotlyar is on our direct line, the producer, andriyu, can you hear me, congratulations, yes, i hear well, well, this is our song, good and new, we constantly talk about it on our broadcast, and there is a letter about it in particular. yes, another lette

it is obvious that marina kuderchuk is not a subject, but it is important for us to continue the pressuren order to eventually come out. to the figure that suits everyone, and andrii, literally in two minutes, a question that worries me personally, because for the sake of justice , i must say that part of the film community, it is more people who still make original films, it seems to me, although not only really united, i have not seen such a consolidation, but there are other ukrainian filmmakers who are mainly engaged in commercial cinema, who are in opposition to others and... here they are more support the state cinema, and they constantly say: "let's go to a dialogue, let's reconcile, let's all find a consensus." is this dialogue possible, relatively speaking, there, well, here you have, who are in opposition to this body, and those moviegoers who support it? i always say that the worst thing derzhkino did was not that they didn't even distribute the funds correctly or didn't go to international, but that they divided the ukrainian ones. cinema, they created these artificial camps,

maryna kuderchuk came to manage it , is exposed to constant criticism not only from the film communityfrom a wider audience, and when the attacks of the state cinema on the dovzhenka center began, well, i did not expect that this scandal would turn out to be such an extra-cinema bubble, and people who would never , in principle, even ukrainian cinema, especially ani dovzhenko was not interested in the center, but now we have a situation with... with the film support council, as i said at the beginning of our program, it is a council, it is a body that determines which films will win, which films will receive state funding, and accordingly , what films can we watch, we will be able to watch in two or three years, and andriy kotlyar is on direct contact with our producer, andriyu, can you hear me? congratulations, yes, i hear it well, well, this is our song, good and new, we constantly talk about it on our broadcast, and about, in particular, there is a letter, yes, another letter from the ukrainian film community with demands and with demands, in particular, to monitor how transparently

kuderchuk, who heads the state cinema, needs to be changed, that this money needs to be handed over.bout the fact that it is not necessary to shoot some entertainment series, because it is not in time, but nothing changes, you know, we are once again appealing to all the governing bodies of the country, the last letter was signed by about 700 filmmakers, i.e. these are all iconic names of today's ukrainian cinema, these are people who, in spite of everything, despite the lack of funding, are now creating and shooting films, i.e. we continue to represent ukraine and ukrainian cinema at international festivals, communicate ... with european, international tv channels, and yes, we, we simply demand compliance with all legal procedures, and when there is no trust in the main one. of the institution that works in this field, it is really correct and today it would be fair to transfer this money to the army until legal processes in this area are established. no one hears us, they don't answer us, that's why we continue to talk to the community today using all kinds of methods. and what do

with this dismissal, even if it happens, because, let's say, maryna kuderchuk almost doesn't decide anything, and according to rumors, you know, andriy yermak manages all the processes in one way or another, and because it happens in many other areas as well, and that's why we have to put up with the fact that now there is a greater emphasis on the support of commercial cinema and on the support of the television product, i.e.... on funding, on state funding, in particular, many broadcasters, our colleagues who make tv series, who make precisely documentary television publicity, and not documentary cinema, which can be presented at various film festivals. now you can see excerpts from the contests that took place at the state cinema, these contests, i think, are the most scandalous in the entire history of the organization, this is the 19th pitching of the state agency for film affairs, and... again, a huge number of people oppose this contest cinematographers, they boycott it, call it illegal, and actually, when these contests were already over, it became clear that they, well, we still don