kurbsky has already written. remind our viewers who kurbsky is?he is, this character is in the film, is in the film, yes, mikhail talanov, named, named, yes, the kurpsky associate of the king before 1564, that is, until somewhere around the first years of the livonian war, when kurpsky, being, holding an important post, as if the governor of the king in yuryev, present-day tartu, in estonia, on the newly conquered lands, accepted. the king turned into a bloody tyrant who dispersed all his associates, executed them and began to flood the whole country with blood. kurbsky, in this story, of course, focuses on internal benefits. audience, let me remind you that ivan the terrible tried unsuccessfully, however, to run for polish kings, he lost the fight, by the way, to the future henry ii, the french king, but his candidacy was considered as such strong candidates, and the story of kurbsky, and in general everything that kurbsky said in poland about ivan the terrible, it was a story, including for the internal polish audience about what... samoud metho

such eminent people, that’s what writes in this regard, the ideologist of the russian boyars, andrei kurbskynteresting, listen, the great prince believes in clerks, russians, and does not elect them... and by the way, this legend, which was given rise to by repin’s painting, ivan the terrible kills his son , was absolutely not true , because when studying. tanks of the son of ivan the terrible there was no wound damage to the skull, traces of arsenic were found in the remains, so this was also the work of the 15th century oligarchy, but this turned out to be not enough, it was unexpectedly completely tsarevich dmitry was killed, he died under rather strange circumstances, as it was written, he fell on a knife, what led up? because there was unrest, an invasion of the poles appeared, a false dmitry i, a false dmitry ii appeared, only through the enormous efforts of the people, as a result , this unrest was suppressed, this is what an attempt on the power of the oligarchy, that is, the oligarchy of the 15th century boyars, can lead to, this is also interesting, so if. think about it, the new n

, kurbsky, kurbsky, absolutely right, i want to ask you to share what you would say if one of the westerng presidency of vladimir putin? the fact is that i would still advise them or encourage them to perceive what the russian president says exactly the way he says it, because russia. the present time does not hide anything, there is no double bottom, no, no secret politics, there is a gap between what russia declares and what russia does, but there is no gap, so westerners are trying to invent this gap, to attribute some secret plans, well, there is a term falsification of history, this is such a constant falsification of the present. and russian intentions, russian actions, this is what we need to abandon, why we are able to communicate well with the world majority, because the world majority. distorts what we do, so i can’t tell them anything secret, because they are looking for those who will invent something secret for them, and not declared, not like it is said openly, i can only advise them to honestly and openly perceive russian statements and russian policies, and not look for so