ida kuskin. let's go. main suspect's retraction of his initial confession requires us to return to this seemingly closed case. oleg eoryevich, bring to the attention of the employees the results of the latest examinations. well, fingerprints were taken from all employees of the yeley company. so. the identification revealed several notable ones. facts, uh-huh, the leaders from which they doused the victim had prints of her, secretary katya, housewife eleya kuskina and a number of smeared prints of other employees, but no prints of vladislav pavlovich kuskin were found, it turns out that kuskin did not touch the kettle, right? perhaps, but even if he erased his prints, he would erase others too. now about the cups, which cups? the thing is, it's in the break room. on the table there were two cups with the remains of coffee, it is safe to say that the victim drank from one cup, and kuzkina inna leonidovna drank from the other, and in this case there are important circumstances, the secretary claims that she

clearly escalating, and under the cover of this moratorium, then a decision was made, well, show kuskin’s that’s what this device was called then, which blew up over, but it worked, what do you think, i think that without... it certainly worked, then what happened next was the caribbean crisis, but as a result of the caribbean crisis we achieved the withdrawal of their missiles from turkey and italy, we got guarantees for castres, well, it’s true, but it turns out that after all, the test itself, it raised the bar, after all, the caribbean crisis was needed after that to defuse, well, the carara crisis, i don’t think that when we deployed the missiles in cuba, we meant that such a development will occur, any parallels are historical, they are usually false and confusing, yes, but still here is the current atmosphere, many colleagues say that they have lost the sense of the seriousness of the threat, so... that’s why a reminder is needed, that’s why kovalchuk speaks about this, i remember, in 1988 there was such an american film, the day after, yeah, and where the horrors of this exchange

clearly escalating, and under the cover of this moratorium, and then the decision was made, well, show kuskin’sher, that ’s what this device was called back then, which was blown up, but it worked, what do you think, i think it certainly worked, then what next? happened, then there was the caribbean crisis, but as a result of the caribbean crisis we achieved the withdrawal of their missiles from turkey and italy, we received guarantees, well, this is true, but it turns out that after all, it was a test in itself, it raised the bar after all, the caribbean crisis after that was needed to defuse, well, the cuban missile crisis, i don't think that when we placed missiles in cuba, we had in mind that such a development would occur, any parallels are historical, they are usually false and confusing. yes, but still, this is the current atmosphere, many colleagues are talking about that they have lost the sense of the seriousness of the threat, so that’s why a reminder is needed, that’s why kovalchuk talks about it, yes , i remember, in 1988 there was such an american film, the day after, yeah, uh, wh