next unscrupulous servants of themis but first to news, the higher anti-corruption court suspended the hearing of the case against the former judge of the kyiv court of appealsetryk . at the end of 2016, the law enforcement officers detained the judge for accepting a $5,000 bribe for the adoption of the necessary decision by the board of which he was a member . the judge hid the money under the judge's mat in a specially sewn inner pocket petryk's detention was suspended from the administration of justice, the trial lasted for 5 years, and now the court simply stopped the case for by petryk's petition, because he mobilized to the ranks of the ukrainian army and became an assistant to the commander of the brigade for legal work, the experts of the de jure foundation stress that it is possible that in this way the judge is simply trying to avoid real punishment, because after dismissal from service it may become a mitigating circumstance pechersky district court of kyiv again was headed by ruslan kozlov and this is already his fourth term in this position, the law expressly prohibits holding the chair of the head of the court for more than two terms in a row,

the kyiv court of appeal did not change the decision of the shevchenkiv court regarding the ex-directormotor sichi , the lawyer of the detainee told reporters. on october 24, the shevchenkivsky district court of kyiv sentenced vyacheslav boguslaev to 2 months and the rest. without the right to bail for the illegal supply of military goods for the russian attack aircraft. the ukrainians said to independence that on december 1, 1991, the all-ukrainian referendum was held, which determined the future of ukraine over 90 years ago. % of citizens supported the creation of a sovereign state of ukraine for such a decision was made both in the western regions and in the crimea and in the east of the country as it was 31 years ago, we will remember in our materials the act of declaration of independence of ukraine was the only question that was submitted to the first all-ukrainian referendum on december 1, 1991. more than 90% of ukrainians answered in the affirmative, particularly in donbas and crimea. the results became a cold shower for those who claimed that the declaration of independence on

the kyiv court of appeal chose preventive measure in the form of detention of the former minister of defense of ukraine mykhailo yezhelom, he held this position in 2010-2012, according to the investigation in april 2010, the ex-minister in a previous conspiracy with the former president yanukovych, the prime minister at the time and other high-ranking officials agreed without consideration to the agreement between ukraine and the russian federation, we are talking about the so-called kharkiv agreements, as a result of such actions , the prerequisites were created for increasing the number of troops of the black sea fleet of russia on the territory of ukraine and in the subsequent invasion of the armed forces of the occupiers into crimea over uah 35 million is the total amount of the assets of the russian energy company blocked by the ukrainian special services. the criminal corporation illegally brought its goods to our country and was assisted in this by one of ukrainian companies that are part of the structure of gazprom, a branch of the monopolist of the aggressor state, sold whol

the kyiv court of appeal chose a preventive measure in the form of detention of the former minister ofense of ukraine mykhailo yezhelom. held this position in 2010-2012, according to the investigation in april 2010, the ex-minister in a previous conspiracy with former president yanukovych at the time

higher anti-corruption court suspended the proceedings on the charges against the former judge at the end of 2016, the law enforcement officers detained a judge of the kyiv court of appealsor petryk, for accepting a $5,000 bribe for the adoption of the necessary decision by the panel of which he was a member . the judge hid the money under the judge's mat in a specially sewn inner pocket. after petryk's arrest, he was suspended from the administration of justice. and now the court simply stopped the case at petryk's request because he was mobilized to the ranks of the ukrainian army and became an assistant commander teams of legal work, experts of the de jure foundation emphasize that it is possible that in this way the judge is simply trying to avoid real punishment, because after dismissal from service it may become a mitigating circumstance. the law expressly forbids holding the chair of the head of the court for more than two terms in a row, however, the judge manages to circumvent the strict rules ruslan kozlov simply resigns shortly before the end of his term of office for a few months, he again holds his usual position, so technically the term has not ended, and t

liquidation of the district administrative court of the city of kyiv in such a way that it does not correspond to the constitution, well, that is, now they are appealing to the constitutional court. as i understand it, they are appealing this decision. it is correct, mr. mykhailo, please give me something. are there any technical difficulties? do i think you can hear me or see her or not so that you they heard my question, the same, i hear your question, give me something, something is visible in the connection, yes, i don't know if they will appeal, they can appeal, they can submit a submission to 45 people's deputies, only if there will be such brave people. well, we will see, taking into account that that 310 the constitutional majority voted and zero against er 310 for the liquidation of the ask. it is interesting and difficult for me to imagine where they where so many deputies will find it first, but everything is possible and that is why it is very important to have an independent constitutional court so that in such cases, if any i'm late or some other contagion, i'm sorry, the enemy that still exists in our verkhovna rada for some reason will

of kyiv . in 2021, ukraine spent uah 1 billion on the liquidation of local general and local appeals courts andneffectively, in particular, 254 million from of the state budget went to pay remuneration to judges who did not administer justice, this happened due to the improper work of the high council of justice and the lack of authority of the higher qualification commission of judges who did not perform their functions on the timely dismissal of the servants of themis. in june, ukraine received the status of a candidate for membership in the european union, subject to the fulfillment of seven key steps, among which the implementation of judicial reform and the reform of the constitutional court two years ago, this court caused a real constitutional crisis in october in 2020, he issued a decision to close the public register of declarations and abolish criminal liability for failure to submit or falsify electronic declarations. this caused mass protests from civil society. the president removed the head of the court, oleksandr tupytskyi, from the position of a judge, and soon dismissed him. of

from the administration of justice during the investigation and bohdan lviv decided to appeal this decision in the infamous and finally liquidated district administrative court of kyivand even more so in in the lawsuit, he demanded not only the reinstatement of the judge of the cassation commercial court, but also the recovery in his favor of the amount of the average monthly earnings during the period of forced absenteeism. i cannot be a russian citizen to be in the status of a court and to be a judge of the supreme court, but if he is reinstated, this will not only restore his rights, he will also be seen as the winner of this situation, according to the information of the head of the de jure foundation, the district administrative court planned not only to reinstate lviv as a judge of the supreme court, but also had to do it on the eve of the congress of judges in order to disrupt the appointment of eight new members of the supreme council of justice, necessary for the further implementation of the judicial reform under this scenario, the formation of a key body of the judicial system will be blocked for at least a year of the supreme council of justice, which is

preserved, any court his or the class or some others will still be able to renew the head lviv decided to appeal this decision in the infamous and finally liquidated district administrative court of kyiv, moreover, in the lawsuit he demanded not only the reinstatement of the judge of the cassation economic court but also the collection in his favor of the amount of the average monthly earnings during forced absenteeism, a russian citizen cannot be a judge and be a judge of the supreme court, but if he is reinstated, this will not only restore his rights, but also will come out of this situation as a winner, according to the information of the head of the de jure foundation, the district administrative court planned not only to reinstate lviv as a judge of the supreme court, but had to do it on the eve of the congress of judges in order to disrupt the appointment of eight new members of the supreme council of justice, necessary for the further implementation of judicial reform under this scenario will block for at least a year the formation of the key body of the judicial system, the supreme council of justice, which is the only one with the constitutional authority to give consent to

court, colleague vitayu tells the details, and in particular about whether it was possible to submit an appeal. vitayu anya managed to submit an appeal today with a dozen activists and deputies of the kyivy council who came to the constitutional court building in order to actually unblock the law 26.62, which provides for the renaming of religious structures that belong to foreign subordination, let's let's listen to the organizers of the action, what they wanted to do today, last time we appealed to one of the judges here, who has a 4-year deadline for the hearing. now we are for everything to the court with a request to implement the law that was adopted in the verkhovna rada, i reported it in the verkhovna rada. we voted for it for leonid, and this law is very simple, he tries to require no special procedure, people should be called russian , people also brought posters on which they asked, uh, that the judge the constitutional court did not block this law a-a and what is the story itself back in 2020 a-a representatives of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate tried to cancel this law, but how do we know that during the review cases in the constitutional court, th

appeal to the supreme court. it's a tactic kyiv seen before from the president's lawyers in terms of just delay. and i think that they'll continue to delay until the absolute last moment they can, and the supreme court doesn't take it up. i don't think the supreme court will take it up. but, you know, they'll take to it the 11th circuit en banc and we'll see what they say. >> carrie, how long could it slow things down? the ruling by the 11th circuit doesn't go into effect for seven days, which obviously gives the president time there. >> right. so it gives him time to appeal. and so then there will be a determination whether or not the justice department can go ahead and actually look at the information. so there is some i think a little bit of ambiguity as to whether or not they can start looking at the information right away, or whether or not they're going to have to wait a little while. i don't think there is any credible basis for the en banc appellate court or for the supreme court to take up the arguments in this case. and i think it's important to point out just how unusual the former pr