and the kyiv city council, as i said earlier, extended the lease agreement with kyiv ocha. the factory is located on three plots of land bordering the archeological, kytaev archaeological complex, and accordingly, there has not been any reaction after this scandalous vote, which took place on july 4, the kyiv city council does not appear in the courts of appeal, and the reaction as such is also there is no and this story with the chinese tract, how long has it been drags on, is it something new, some new story or an old one? eh, old enough, because it was the first chinese celebration. was leased back in 2004, and in 2007, the purpose changed, which actually allowed construction to be carried out on the territory of the kytaiv tract. direct legal proceedings began in september 23rd at the attorney general's office, the attorney general's office demanded that these parcels be turned over to the state, because they are ultimately an archaeological site, and that all construction be stopped. there why did it come back now in public discourse? the reason is quite simple: at the