nikita, how do you comment on the statement of the head of gur kyril budanov that telegram can pose aeat national security of ukraine? i agree with mr. kirill in the first part of his statement, well known to everyone, and i do not agree in the second. well, really to... the messenger, or rather we should characterize telegram as a social network, a social platform, there are a lot of questions, and in particular, well, a lot of examples that can testify, and in my opinion, testify to the cooperation of telegram with the authorities of so-called russia and in particular with its special services, the last example is the protests in bashkiria. uh, well, maybe our viewers weren't all following, there there were protests in the so-called russia, and literally, you know, in a matter of minutes there, for some reason telegram blocked two local channels, which were just uniting the people who were coordinating their protest activities there, how it happened is not clear, why exactly, then these channels were blocked. moreover, these are local channels, in general there were already protests

would wanted to listen now to the representative and head of the main intelligence department , kyril budanovwhat he, in particular, advises the population as to which of... remains in crimea. russia lost a quarter of its ships and was forced to withdraw its fleet to the caucasus coast. repaint aviation, because airfields and military facilities in crimea are constantly interrupted. under our fiery influence, i want to emphasize, we owe our successes to the residents of ukrainian crimea, who not only strengthened their resistance to the occupiers, but also found an opportunity to quickly monitor the entire situation on the peninsula and transmit this information to us as soon as possible. budanov emphasizes that it is the inhabitants of the peninsula who are the irreplaceable source of information and help later with additional intelligence on the results of the work of the defense forces. er, all this is done by people who remain in crimea, and kyrylo budanov still persistently warns civilians against using the kerch bridge, i think that purely technologically, with military analysts, expert