and the department so there would not be any need to hire a hearing officer to go through a very laborious, linthicum and sometimes expensive hearing process. -- linthicum and sometimes expensive hearing process -- lengthy. should there not be any agreement, and then the comptroller would have the responsibility to appoint a hearing officer. which we currently do. the amendment also gives us a little bit more latitude for appointing the hearing officer and allows the hearing officer to be either someone or an attorney with experience in construction law. we pay the rent board for that work. and then, finally, it establishes guidelines for the hearing officer process come on and the hearing officer must conduct a fair and impartial hearing and establishes that it is the appellant's responsibility by proving with a preponderance of evidence that it is incorrect, so, again, this is the process they have used. however, it is no specified in the ordinance that is before you, and then, finally, it establishes a requirement that they have procedures for unclaimed funds. so once in awhile, when th

members of the jury worked hard and a laborious process . they were tense and emotional moments. now on count 5 obstruction of justice as you heard from healther guilty . when bopped's testified before the grand jury, this jury found that he was not direct, he was being very evasive and that's why they found him guilty. they were asked about his former girl friend. they said she could not be trusted and there was a lot of inconsistency with her testimony . teave hods who had recordings. the jury said there was inconsistencies there, too. >> the evidence that he used steroids might have been there. but did he knowingly do steroids was the question. we couldn't prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. >> none of the jury wanted to give their full name. this is what the foreman said if bond were to be tried again. what would prosecutors need to do next time around? >> it costs the citizens a lot of money to bring him to court. it is up to the court if they can prove their case, they will have to do more homework than they already did. >>> and we'll give you more information about how i

they do not have to go through the laborious process. i have tried very hard to take as many of those cases away from the commission that i can. chair chu: you did not speak much about the medical conditions or the modified except for the fact that you have looked at the numbers. what are redoing to try to bring these numbers down? >> i am going to let alice, and talk about this, and this is very proactive, especially to make sure that they can be accommodated for whatever issues they have but also to put them in a position to serve a function that would, again, allow me to pull someone off of an administrative tasks and get them back in the field, but alice will speak to this more. >> supervisor, with regards to the number of 43, those are individuals that have basically been put in their accommodative position because they cannot perform the essential functions of a police officer. for those employees and officers, they are not governed under the new policy, which provides that they can be on disability for up to one year, and on tempo

and it's really laborious, time- consuming work t takes hours and days. >> reporter: the clock is tick until the nuptials. tracy doesn't deny his head wear will be worn on the middleton side of the family of the wedding but does confirm he will see his designs worn by several guests and some members of prince william's family. princess beatrice will be wearing that? >> yes. she has a beautiful valentino couture suit. >> reporter: this is not the first royal wedding for phillip tracy. in fact, he has long been favorite of prince william's stepmother. tracy designed the headdress camilla parker bowles wore when she married prince charles in 2005. he thought of tying in the gold colors in the chapel. he first saw kate middleton on tv wearing one of his designs. she had bought it in his store. >> very, you know, low key. she will be fantastic for british fashion design. >> reporter: tracy's designed for armani, lauren, valentino. his head wear has been worn by royalty and everyday people. >> it's a symbol of positivivity. and there is nothing more positive than the royal wedding. >> report

it's very laborious, it's nicely written, but so full of facts that the average reader can't really get into it. but flexner writing originally and beginning to learn about washington, kind of consciously counterprogrammed freeman. he said, okay, i'm going to write a biography of washington that people can read and give flexner his credit. he was a beautiful writer, he was a very imaginative and intelligence man. and he did do his research on washington. he did look at the evidence. i think he decided i'm going to extrapolate from the facts to tell a story that i think may well have happened. >> host: do you think if he were sitting here he was say i was unscrupulous and take things that were not factual? he certainly in his books says he wants to be to the degree that he can be a scientific historian, as he described, freeman. when i checked, he gives a lot of credit to freeman. i think he would agree with you, this is the best most scholarly work. he wants more a focus on character and delineating washington's character. freeman trying to do it, but not in the same way. he might have

it's very laborious. it's nicely written and so full of facts that the average reader can't really get into it. well, flexner writing originally and beginning to learn about washington around the same time freeman was writing and he knew freeman, kind of consciously counter-programmed freeman and said, okay, i'm going to write a biography of washington that people can actually read. and give -- and give flexner his credit. he was a beautiful writer. he was a very imaginative man, a very intelligent man. and he did do his research on washington. he did look at the research and did look at the evidence but i think where he was unscrupulous and i believe he was consciously unscrupulous is that he decided, i'm going to extrapolate from the facts to tell a story that i think may well may have happened. do you think if he was sitting here and say i was consciously unscrupulous and take things that were not factual to make a point? in his book he says, you know, he wants to be to the degree that he can be what h

the process by which the decennial census questions are arrived at is a laborious one that brings in a whole lot of stakeholders. we then submit the questionnaire to congress. in the year that ends in six, and again in seven, for your review. so it is truly a collaborative process. >> we actually act on that? >> i think that has buried over decades. on how congress has reacted to that. >> on following up on senator brown, we could had in the decennial census the question, are u.s. citizen, are you a little resident? that is possible for that is nothing that precludes us from asking that. >> nothing that i know of. >> that is what i want to know. we had testimony about why it isn't born to have a decennial census director that spans administrations? >> his stewardship. the life cycle of the senses census to implement change can take years. what has happened when we run up to the 2010 census, there was a lot of turnover with the directors. if you look back in 1969, the average tenure is three years for the census director. along this was five years. >> my question to dr. groves -- are

it was a laborious and detailed process. she was not selected and that was confirmed by the office of personnel management. >> where was that decision made? >> the initial selection of the proposed ses was december 17. she was informed she was -- had not received a promotion on january 10. we were working on him on board -- working on onboarding. it was not released from her department until march 2. we received notification that her department had released her. we were informed by the office of the chief human capital officer that her start date would be march 14. we took the first opportunity to notify her on march 4 which would have been the day after testimony. it was in order to give her notice this was happening. she was aware it was coming on board and she did not know the date certain. we were attempting to tell her with as much time as possible so she could move offices. the office moves are comparable. i had made a decision to have the new ses closer to me. they're one of two people who report to me. >> will take a

a process by which the decennial sent this question are arrived at is the laborious one that brings in whole lot of stakeholders. we then submit the questionnaire to congress in the year that ends in six and in seven. and for your review -- so it is truly a collaborative process. >> do we actually have done that? >> i think that is. over decades on how congress has reacted. >> when i'm actually following up a little and senator brown is the could haves in the decennial senses a question, a u.s. citizen? we could have that. >> there's nothing that clues us from asking that. >> not as i understand it. >> that's what they want to make sure. >> the other thing is we had testimony. but it's important whether decennial senses director that expensive ministrations? >> what it comes down to his stewardship. it seems the course of the decade. several implementations for change as you well know can take years. and so what has happened in the run-up to the 2010 cents is both a lot of turnover among the directors. if you look back since 1969, the average tenure is about three years for the sent th

and we began the laborious process of vetting it through the united states government. it was almost exactly two years ago that i flew with the president on air force one to go over it on a four-hour flight. at this time, i'm going to give my standard disclaimer. my views are solely my view. they are not the views of the obama administration or the president. please do not confuse whatever i have to say with the views of the obama administration. secondly, of course, as you noted in the introduction, we are in the midst of a major crisis between the u.s. and pakistan. "the deadly embrace" has become literally quite deadly in the last month. raymond davis who was apparently an american diplomat. i don't know who he works for. don't ask me. i can't confirm who he works for. shot to death two pakistani citizens, a third pakistani citizen was killed by another american driving a vehicle coming to his rescue. and in the weekend after those deaths, the widow of one of the two committed suicide. because she believed that her government would not stand up to the united states o

and we began the laborious process of vetting it through the united states government. it was almost exactly two years ago that i flew with the president on air force one to go over it on a four-hour flight. at this time, i'm going to give my standard disclaimer. my views are solely my view. they are not the views of the obama administration or the president. please do not confuse whatever i have to say with the views of the obama administration. secondly, of course, as you noted in the introduction, we are in the midst of a major crisis between the u.s. and pakistan. "the deadly embrace" has become literally quite deadly in the last month. raymond davis who was apparently an american diplomat. i don't know who he works for. don't ask me. i can't confirm who he works for. shot to death two pakistani citizens, a third pakistani citizen was killed by another american driving a vehicle coming to his rescue. and in the weekend after those deaths, the widow of one of the two committed suicide. because she believed that her government would not stand up to the united states o

it was a laborious and detailed process.d and that was confirmed by the office of personnel management. >> where was that decision made? >> the initial selection of the proposed ses was december 17. she was informed she was -- had not received a promotion on january 10. we were working on him on board -- working on onboarding. it was not released from her department until march 2. we received notification that her department had released her. we were informed by the office of the chief human capital officer that her start date would be march 14. we took the first opportunity to notify her on march 4 which would have been the day after testimony. it was in order to give her notice this was happening. she was aware it was coming on board and she did not know the date certain. we were attempting to tell her with as much time as possible so she could move offices. the office moves are comparable. i had made a decision to have the new ses closer to me. they're one of two people who report to me. >> will take a five minute recess