labour party doesn't really have an answer _ labour party doesn't really have an answer for— labour partyr party doesn't really have an answer for it, yet— labour party doesn't really have an answer for it, yet people _ labour party doesn't really have an answer for it, yet people in - labour party doesn't really have ani answer for it, yet people in cabinet like yvette — answer for it, yet people in cabinet like yvette cooper— answer for it, yet people in cabinet like yvette cooper who _ answer for it, yet people in cabinet like yvette cooper who did - answer for it, yet people in cabinet like yvette cooper who did not - answer for it, yet people in cabineti like yvette cooper who did not serve under _ like yvette cooper who did not serve underjeremy— like yvette cooper who did not serve underjeremy corbyn, _ like yvette cooper who did not serve underjeremy corbyn, and that - like yvette cooper who did not serve underjeremy corbyn, and that of. underjeremy corbyn, and that of course _ underjeremy corbyn, and that of course you have _ underjeremy corbyn, and that of course you have people

labour party doesn't really have an answer _ labour party doesn't really have an answer for— labour partyho did not serve underjeremy corbyn, and that of. underjeremy corbyn, and that of course _ underjeremy corbyn, and that of course you have _ underjeremy corbyn, and that of course you have people - underjeremy corbyn, and that of course you have people like - underjeremy corbyn, and that of course you have people like keir| course you have people like keir stanner— course you have people like keir starmer who— course you have people like keir starmer who very _ course you have people like keir starmer who very much - course you have people like keir starmer who very much did, - course you have people like keiri starmer who very much did, and course you have people like keir- starmer who very much did, and said that he _ starmer who very much did, and said that he would — starmer who very much did, and said that he would essentially _ starmer who very much did, and said that he would essentially continue i that he would essentially continue on the _ that he would essentially continue on

only labour will transform our labour— building.n the trickle down nonsense once and for all. applause and finally, i promise this. a determination to bring our country together. — determination to bring our country together, not exploit its divisions. an understanding that britain's standing — an understanding that britain's standing in the world can never be taken _ standing in the world can never be taken for— standing in the world can never be taken for granted and the politics of respect and service, that show zero _ of respect and service, that show zero tolerance towards the darker side of— zero tolerance towards the darker side of westminster. don't get me wrong. _ side of westminster. don't get me wrong, there are good people in westminster. people who love their country _ westminster. people who love their country and want to change it for the better~ — country and want to change it for the better. and yet, a basic principle _ the better. and yet, a basic principle of any organisation i have worked _ principle of any organ

many people listenin: labour government. many people listening to _ labour government.listening to what you _ labour government. many people listening to what you are - labour government. many people listening to what you are saying i listening to what you are saying already perhaps we'll be saying, i have had enough of this. there is a lot of apathy, isn't there, when it comes to british politics? how are you going to win them over and what does project hope mean? i you going to win them over and what does project hope mean?— does pro'ect hope mean? i don't think does project hope mean? i don't think there _ does project hope mean? i don't think there is _ does project hope mean? i don't think there is apathy, _ does project hope mean? i don't think there is apathy, actually. i | think there is apathy, actually. i think there is apathy, actually. i think when people are struggling to get a gp appointment in the morning when the kids are ill, your kid has woken up with a sore throat, coughing and a temperature and you are desperate to see a gp and you can't get your kit

the labour party . he would just the labour party.they? >> absolutely. i mean, if you think some of the labour mps at the moment are pretty grim, wait till you see what's waiting down the line after the next election. you ain't seen election. i mean, you ain't seen nothing . yes. and this and nothing yet. yes. and this and thangam debbonaire on thangam debbonaire going on about white privilege. that is , about white privilege. that is, it is middle class white guilt coming out. i know she's not white, but that's all this national trust business and all the wokeism in various organisations like that. it is a complete nonsense. the privilege that people in this country have is to be british, to be born in this country, to live in this country. that's the privilege to live here. what gives you privilege is much more importantly colour. is importantly than your colour. is your economic status, status and your economic status, status and your etc. try telling your wealth, etc. try telling the workers in port talbot that they've got white p

only labour will make a difference. only labour _ labour will make a difference.onal renewal. and you — britain back to national renewal. and you have the power to vote for it, a party— and you have the power to vote for it, a party of— and you have the power to vote for it, a party of service with a plan versus— it, a party of service with a plan versus a — it, a party of service with a plan versus a party with nothing to offer because _ versus a party with nothing to offer because it — versus a party with nothing to offer because it only cares about itself. hope _ because it only cares about itself. hope or— because it only cares about itself. hope or cynicism? a new politics of the same _ hope or cynicism? a new politics of the same old westminster? continue to decline _ the same old westminster? continue to decline with the tories or national— to decline with the tories or national renewal with labour? applause. nobody in britain thinks the years ahead _ nobody in britain thinks the years ahead will be easy. but this year is the chance. — ahead will be easy. b

why labour?ow every corner of our country. why labour? because we have a plan to take back our streets, switch on great british energy, get the nhs back on its feet, tear down the barriers to opportunity and get britain building again. can i welcome, rishi sunak, the prime minister. - as for number ten's current incumbent, he has been at a battleground in the east midlands and gave the strongest hint yet about when polling day might be. my working assumption is we will have a general election in the second half of this year but in the meantime i have a lot i want to get on with. this saturday we are introducing a significant tax cut for millions of people in work. worth £450 for the average worker. but he argues taxes are at a record high. it is one of the issues the election will be fought on and there will be plenty more pressing afresh the ship but the campaign proper could be many more months away. live now to our political correspondent, harry farley. the reaction from opposition parties, la

government, we want them to vote labour to do so. that a labour government, we want them to vote labourscotland they are suffering - vote labour to do so. at the moment in scotland they are suffering from i in scotland they are suffering from having two failing governments, one in westminster and one in scotland. should he go and see him? we in westminster and one in scotland. should he go and see him?- in westminster and one in scotland. should he go and see him? we are not doinu deals should he go and see him? we are not doing deals with _ should he go and see him? we are not doing deals with the _ should he go and see him? we are not doing deals with the snp, _ should he go and see him? we are not doing deals with the snp, the - doing deals with the snp, the important thing is to have a labour government elected to get rid of the conservatives where everything feels broken right across the country. low growth, low opportunities, it's time for something better. and growth, low opportunities, it's time for something better.— for something better. and isn't part ofthe for something bett

yeah, because can labour because ryan can see that labour set a plan. because ryan can see that labourcause ryan can see that labour set and a pl afraid what had >> and i'm afraid what we've had from the government has been gimmicks. we've more home gimmicks. we've had more home secretaries the conservative secretaries in the conservative party gone rwanda . party who have gone to rwanda. then people have there to then people have gone there to be . this obviously be processed. this obviously isn't £400 million of isn't working. £400 million of taxpayers money put into this. why isn't the government doing what labour has called for on this? you talked about smashing the criminal gangs, convict for a criminal. people smugglers have gone down by 30. labour said . we need to have a cross said. we need to have a cross border elite police unit focussed these criminals , so focussed on these criminals, so we get those convictions up. we actually some actually have some accountability justice accountability and justice against these people. we need to do that. we need to be recruiting more ca

there's no rail strike labour. in labour, strike in labour.un wales. gloria where the labour run government uh, works run government there, uh, works in the in social partnership with the unions. a deal that unions. they found a deal that doesn't the they doesn't break the bank. they agreed some workplace reforms and they've disruptive and they've avoided disruptive industrial has deliberate , government has deliberate, provoked and the provoked and poisoned the industrial dispute. so how prolonged it if you become transport secretary, how will you increase that you pay for the increase that those who has paid for those people who has paid for the strike for more than a year, it's cost £1 billion this it's cost £1 billion pay. this government has wasted more than £1 in taxpayers money by £1 billion in taxpayers money by provoking and prolonging this industrial dispute . that's more industrial dispute. that's more than to see, than they ever expected to see, i would argue. viewers are saying another labour saying today is another labour shadow

there will be scrutiny on the labour party but as joe will be scrutiny on the labour party but asjoeonsistently pretty tough and pretty bad for the government for quite some time so i can understand why they want to go along. i think that gap will narrow and it will only narrow probably only a small amount because when you go around the country, the message of people are saying is that they are fed up and ready for a change. so i think by delaying it to the second half of the year, they are delaying the inevitable. i know there are some tories, david davis this weekend were saying that they can turn things around but when you look at the fact really affecting people's lives, their cost of living crisis, their troubles with the nhs, public services, it is going to be very difficult for the tories to turn on that feeling.- very difficult for the tories to turn on that feeling. rishi sunak was talking _ turn on that feeling. rishi sunak was talking there, _ turn on that feeling. rishi sunak was talking there, keen - turn on that feeling. rishi sunak was talking there, keen to - turn on

labour will never do people. labour will never do that. people. labour will never do that .le. labour will never do that. i will never do that . this that. i will never do that. this is the year of choice , the year is the year of choice, the year that the british people will give their verdict on. rishi sunak and 14 years of conservative government and rishi sunak can bottle it as much as he wants. but we say bnng much as he wants. but we say bring it on, it is time for a general election. it is time for the british people to decide and as people make that choice , they as people make that choice, they will ask themselves these questions and me and my family better off after 14 years of conservative government, are our schools , our hospitals, our schools, our hospitals, our transport, our police ? are they transport, our police? are they working better than when the conservatives came to office? 14 years ago ? i mean, frankly, is years ago? i mean, frankly, is anything in britain working better today? when the conservatives came to office 14 years ago, the answers to those

labour part you talk about labour having and you talk about labour having not changed.ou acknowledge you agree with acknowledge that you agree with keir starmer israel and then keir starmer on israel and then you also talk about batley and the case of what's the appalling case of what's happened teacher, the happened to the teacher, the labour there is a lesbian and labour mp there is a lesbian and was assaulted a great deal by the people. you're trying to claim you're on labour's side. they didn't vote for her and you talk about these mistakes talk about all these mistakes that happened. didn't vote talk about all these mistakes tha her.)pened. didn't vote talk about all these mistakes tha her. jpenevoted didn't vote talk about all these mistakes tha her. jpenevoted foridn't vote talk about all these mistakes tha her.)penevoted for georgete for her. they voted for george galloway. talk about all galloway. and you talk about all these mistakes that have happened. what the happened. tell me, what have the tory done about this? tory government done about this? >> pretty.

labour lose link.bour actually lose the election if they don't the next election if they don't spell out their immigration plan? does keir starmer even have one? and will he tell us what it is if he does? um, don't go anywhere. lots more coming up your messages coming in on the debate. we've just had about what's going on in the red sea and should we get involved, military wise? david uh, good evening. says, we ever evening. david says, do we ever learn involved with learn getting involved with middle keep middle east wars? we must keep out always end up out because we always end up with consequences. thought out because we always end up with wouldequences. thought out because we always end up with would feelnces. thought out because we always end up with would feel like thought out because we always end up with would feel like that. ught people would feel like that. i mean, even though we've explained that, what message do we we get we send out? we don't get involved, certainly to china. um, meanwhile

labour will also be absoll it wants wants but labour will also be absoll it wants to wants but labour wants to enhance the to do. it wants to enhance the police force working together. >> point, is >> that's the selling point, is it? a huge amount of goodwill. >> well, it is if it gets things done, patrick. it is if it means that the is that actually the law is enforced. to. enforced. we have to. >> seen the eu. >> we've seen the eu. >> we've seen the eu. >> we've seen the eu. >> we won't. we're writing it at the we're writing huge the moment. we're writing huge checks they're checks to france and they're laughing our faces. we laughing in our faces. what we need have france doing need to do is have france doing what which what the belgians do, which is confiscate need confiscate the phones. we need to the anti—terrorism to use the anti—terrorism legislation which keir starmer has one has made his number one priority, refuse priority, and the tories refuse to anti—terrorism to use the anti—terrorism legislation serious legislation if they were serious about if about stopping the gangs

labour is saying business| wants certainty. fair enough, but labour keeps changing. incoming labour government? that is a priority, to grow the economy for the financial sector and therefore have no cap on bonuses except the maximum, which is 200% of regular income? the except the maximum, which is 200% of regular income?— regular income? the criticism we made at the _ regular income? the criticism we made at the time... _ regular income? the criticism we made at the time... why - regular income? the criticism we made at the time... why is - regular income? the criticism we made at the time... why is the l regular income? the criticism we - made at the time... why is the party bu in: made at the time... why is the party buying this? — made at the time... why is the party buying this? there _ made at the time... why is the party buying this? there was _ made at the time... why is the party buying this? there was nothing - made at the time... why is the party buying this? there was nothing in i buying this? there was nothing in the buduet buying this? there was nothing

i think in the labour party.hink really that , um, you began to really that, um, you began to get an inkling of the, the third way, uh , policies that he was way, uh, policies that he was thinking of putting together and that was a triumvirate between peter mandelson, gordon brown and tony and probably when he reached sort of shadow shadow home secretary , he was the point home secretary, he was the point you you thought this man is the new leader. but of course , that new leader. but of course, that could have been years off. and it was only the tragic and sudden death of john smith that suddenly propelled him into the front line . front line. >> and this is one of the fascinating things about 1997. come the election , that tony come the election, that tony blair is popular with almost everybody , even tories . diehard everybody, even tories. diehard tories don't dislike him. they're not frightened by him. they're not frightened by him. they may still be voting for john major, but they feel that it'll all be all

i think in the labour party.hink really that , um, you began to really that, um, you began to get an inkling of the, the third way, uh , policies that he was way, uh, policies that he was thinking of putting together and that was a triumvirate between peter mandelson, gordon brown and tony and probably when he reached sort of shadow shadow home secretary , he was the point home secretary, he was the point you you thought this man is the new leader. but of course , that new leader. but of course, that could have been years off. and it was only the tragic and sudden death of john smith that suddenly propelled him into the front line . front line. >> and this is one of the fascinating things about 1997. come the election , that tony come the election, that tony blair is popular with almost everybody , even tories . diehard everybody, even tories. diehard tories don't dislike him. they're not frightened by him. they're not frightened by him. they may still be voting for john major, but they feel that it'll all be all

labour have been ahead _ solution to that fury. labour have been ahead in _ solution to that fury.ve been ahead in opinion _ solution to that fury. labour have been ahead in opinion polls - solution to that fury. labour have been ahead in opinion polls for. been ahead in opinion polls for quite a while, is there a sense of having it all to lose, in effect? kind of, yes. i can't remember the last time the conservatives where ahead in an opinion poll. it was back when borisjohnson was prime minister, i think. back when borisjohnson was prime minister, ithink. in back when borisjohnson was prime minister, i think. in any opinion poll, pollsters vary on the margin of labour�*s lead, but they all agree that labour, as it stands are well ahead of the conservatives. but the people who run the labour party, strategists in the labour party have lost four general elections on the bounce and so they are not complacent and they are drumming into their teams, walking around labour hq, into their teams, walking around labour ho, telling them not to be complacent. it is extraordinary in the conte

it looks like it will win in by elections, labour has been because although labour hasn't been doing,pinion of labour and kier starmer, it is doing far better than conservatives, it is hard to express just how bad public opinion is on rishi sunak. it's kind of near where borisjohnson where when they were sacked or deposed, rather, as prime minister. he is in a really bad state, and there are, as i say, material reasons. people are experiencing life very badly at the moment. kier starmer is seen as the lesser of two evils at the moment. thank you you both, back with you in a moment. to the middle east now, in lebanon, where the funeral of the deputy leader of hamas has been taking place in the lebanese capital beirut. saleh al—arouri was killed on tuesday. this is the funeral procession al—arouri and two other officials carried through the streets. he was assassinated in a drone strike on tuesday. the leader of the lebanese militant group hezbollah, has threatened a decisive response to the killing. israel has neither confirmed nor denied involvement. our correspondent hugo bachega has

but that's precisely the labour party's plan to solve the labour party's plan to solve the migrationis. masterly inactivity as things stand, the polls suggest that the labour party is on course to win a majority of more than 100 seats at the next election . so it at the next election. so it seems to me only right to discuss the opposition's five point to tackle the channel point plan to tackle the channel migration crisis. so it was really interesting yesterday in the house of commons that all the house of commons that all the conservatives wanted rwanda to happen one way or another. they disagreed on the degrees of figour they disagreed on the degrees of rigour with which it should be applied, but they disagree on the end result . whereas all the the end result. whereas all the opposition parties want to do nothing, they wanted to fiddle and twiddle. so what are these five points? number to one, crack down on criminal smuggler gangs ? well, this is stating the gangs? well, this is stating the absolutely obvious why ? why absolutely obvious why? why would the labour party be any more

labour points it's labour 25 points ahead.n for quite been about that for quite a while now. and your thoughts on that? if i may, your that? and also, if i may, your thoughts on this idea that only 17% of brits and when you take that to the 18 to 20 fours, only 41% of brits would actively fight for britain at a time of war. >> does that really surprise you?i >> does that really surprise you? i mean, i wouldn't, i wouldn't, would you? emily would you sean i wouldn't , i would. you sean i wouldn't, i would. >> my family's here if it came down to it. >> the question was if it came down to it. >> well, if there was a war or otherwise, you'd just find yourself. >> would we fight to defend it? >> would we fight to defend it? >> i don't think that's surprising. it was the same case in one. people did not in world war one. people did not want to sign up. what we'll do was slightly different, but i think it's reflective of was slightly different, but i thiane s reflective of was slightly different, but i thiane feel reflective of was s

i labour shortage in many sectors.or people who take care of sick people, for nursing care, but there is also the need for specialist in it, artificial intelligence. the good thing is it spans a broad spectrum. there is a need for waiters in restaurants. there are a lot of companies are looking to hire that means that despite business being at the moment subdued, if they find it semi—suitable they still hire. just semi-suitable they still hire. just lookin: at semi—suitable they still hire. just looking at inflation, what are your thoughts on how that looks for the eurozone? ., ., , ., ., , eurozone? inflation is now going up and down a — eurozone? inflation is now going up and down a little _ eurozone? inflation is now going up and down a little bit _ eurozone? inflation is now going up and down a little bit because - eurozone? inflation is now going up and down a little bit because of- and down a little bit because of basic effects from last year's energy price changes. until late this year, inflation will fall furth

door to labour.s migration. it was then continued under david cameron and later boris johnson, who further liberalised the whole system . new labour the whole system. new labour set the whole thing motion , net thing in motion, took net migration 200,000, and migration to over 200,000, and tony blair, i would argue, was as much an architect of the brexit vote as david cameron because many of those concerns over migration and the pace of change in the country obviously found their expression in the vote for brexit. but boris put it on steroids. i mean, boris was the guy who came in and was the guy who then came in and instead of giving people control and what he promised, which was lower overall numbers, he liberalised system. so liberalised the whole system. so migration of europe migration from outside of europe then rocketed to nearly well to over 700,000in 2022. and removed the requirement for british companies to advertise jobs in britain first. so boris was not a conservative in my view, was a l

first labour our of our labour first labour terme. it takes some terme.ntify the right projects and in the right projects and invest in the right way. and a big part of the way. but and a big part of the 28 billion, of course, is the three, the £3 billion clean steel one example of what steel fund. one example of what we terms of driving we will do in terms of driving decarbonisation without deindustrialisation . deindustrialisation. >> thank you very much indeed for joining this morning. forjoining me this morning. stephen go stephen kinnock, don't go anywhere break anywhere because after the break i'm to be speaking to i'm going to be speaking to robert , the who quit robert jenrick, the man who quit as immigration minister, because he government's he thought the government's rwanda far rwanda plan didn't go far enough. anywhere radio. >> welcome back to the camilla tominey show. thank you for your company. this sunday morning, robert joins me now. he robert jenrick joins me now. he was immigration minister was the immigration minister before his resign

denny says no labour will probably do worse . labour will probably do worse. in this country. it really interesting , country. it really interesting, dennis, and all the polling that's being done , you know, up that's being done, you know, up to a third of people are saying they're just not sure and they wouldn't mind having some form of alternative . ken starmer do of alternative. ken starmer do better ? asked patricia herself better? asked patricia herself a big fat no, he can't. no confidence from patricia . and confidence from patricia. and gaby finally says , i guess what gaby finally says, i guess what i really think labour and conservative parties are the same. no difference in policies, high taxes , high immigration, high taxes, high immigration, etc. we actually need change. we need a party that put britain first in economy , education and first in economy, education and health and gaby, i agree with that. the problem is we have an electoral system that makes it very, very difficult to achieve that. very, very difficult to achieve that . now, let us g

there you go. >> we going to get a labour >> are we going to get a labour government default?>> yeah, i suspect >> peter lloyd yeah, i suspect so. i think the rest of the so. and i think the rest of the country believes this um, country believes this too. um, l, country believes this too. um, i, i hear what philip says and i wish it were true, but i think actually rishi sealed his own fate when he fired suella braverman, who really the braverman, who was really the voice of the average person in this country. of the average gb news viewer, i think really, that's what sealed his fate and nothing he can do now is going to save that. i think it's just a matter of time before she is in control. >> philip, briefly, before >> well, philip, briefly, before i you off to make dinner i let you run off to make dinner for because i that, for esther, because i know that, you know, she's got an even fuller in—tray than you. now, um , does squabbling, fuller in—tray than you. now, um , does squabbling , this , does this squabbling, this soap opera within the tory party demonstrate that they

of the labour party, and - corbyn years and show a different side of the labour party, and was| sidety, and was very keen to make _ side of the labour party, and was very keen to make sure _ side of the labour party, and was very keen to make sure that - side of the labour party, and was. very keen to make sure that labour was positioned _ very keen to make sure that labour was positioned in— very keen to make sure that labour was positioned in a _ very keen to make sure that labour was positioned in a different - very keen to make sure that labour was positioned in a different way . was positioned in a different way from _ was positioned in a different way from jeremy— was positioned in a different way from jeremy corbyn— was positioned in a different way from jeremy corbyn on _ was positioned in a different way from jeremy corbyn on a - was positioned in a different way from jeremy corbyn on a lot - from jeremy corbyn on a lot of policy — from jeremy corbyn on a lot of policy issues _ from jeremy corbyn on a lot of policy issues. this _ from jeremy corbyn on a lot of policy issues.

why labour? - serve your interests. why labour? because _ serve your interests. why labour?y labour? because we will grow every corner of our country — because we will grow every corner of our country. why labour? because we have a _ our country. why labour? because we have a plan— our country. why labour? because we have a plan to take back our streets. _ have a plan to take back our streets, switch on great british energy. — streets, switch on great british energy, get the nhs back on its feet, _ energy, get the nhs back on its feet, tear— energy, get the nhs back on its feet, tear down the barriers to opportunity and get britain building again _ opportunity and get britain building again. can opportunity and get britain building aaain. . . ., , opportunity and get britain building aaain. . .., , ,, ., ~ again. can i welcome, rishi sunak, the prime minister. _ again. can i welcome, rishi sunak, the prime minister. as _ again. can i welcome, rishi sunak, the prime minister. as for- again. can i welcome, rishi sunak, the prime minister. as for number| the prime minister. as

there you go. >> we going to get a labour >> are we going to get a labour government default?by default? >> yeah, i suspect >> peter lloyd yeah, i suspect so. i think the rest of the so. and i think the rest of the country believes this um, country believes this too. um, l, country believes this too. um, i, i hear what philip says and i wish it were true, but i think actually rishi sealed his own fate when he fired suella braverman, who really the braverman, who was really the voice of the average person in this country. of the average gb news viewer, i think really, that's what sealed his fate and nothing he can do now is going to save that. i think it's just a matter of time before she is in control. >> philip, briefly, before >> well, philip, briefly, before i you off to make dinner i let you run off to make dinner for because i that, for esther, because i know that, you know, she's got an even fuller in—tray than you. now, um , does squabbling, fuller in—tray than you. now, um , does squabbling , this , does this squabbling, this soap opera within the tory party demonstrat

paul richards, labour insider richards, a labour insider and former .ting. relaxed about it, to be honest, if i was 25 points ahead in the polls, i'd fairly well. i'd be fairly relaxed as well. but you know, things can change and there are , what, nine or so and there are, what, nine or so months to go. as we've been months to go. but as we've been discussing , it's four years to discussing, it's four years to the day since the uk left the european union , politicians have european union, politicians have been spinning their own stories. yes, the labour party , of yes, the labour party, of course, highlights the uk's economic stagnation. >> they say , and the tories >> they say, and the tories point to the uk outgrowing countries like germany since the uk left eu. uk left the eu. >> labour insists it will renegotiate the brexit deal next yearifit renegotiate the brexit deal next year if it wins power, and the tories say this is simply keir starmer's plan to undo brexit entirely, taking the country back to square one now health minister andrea leadsom ma

labour 100, of labour wants to stop 100, of course.pport that's support the legislation. that's been designed to do that. you should probably be encouraged, in fact, that some of the righties tory party righties of the tory party didn't succeed their didn't succeed in their amendments, have amendments, which would have toughened actually, toughened the law up. actually, it supported by the one it was supported by the one nafion it was supported by the one nation left nation group that are more left leaning party that leaning in the tory party that should the labour party should make the labour party happy, it's not the sort of happy, that it's not the sort of right wing legislation that people feared, it's a bit people feared, that it's a bit softer should softer and therefore it should go upper chamber go through the upper chamber unchallenged because unchallenged. well, because you want boats. well we want to stop the boats. well we voted against the right wing amendments that came forward because they would be undermining commitment

it's labour or right. so that labour or tory, right.s it is. >> you're saying we stand down so millions of people are not allowed opinion. allowed to express an opinion. >> dilemma and you >> here's your dilemma and you perpetuate the perpetuate failure. here's the thing keep our thing that ought to keep our tice awake at night. tice esquire awake at night. right? it's not mrs. tice . right? and it's not mrs. tice. what you need to think about is it's starmer sunak and it's starmer versus sunak and you know as well as i do that starmer is a million times worse. look sunak has failed. >> tories are finished. >> the tories are finished. >> the tories are finished. >> you can't address point. >> you can't address that point. you address that point. >> a million >> what i'm starmer is a million times worse. >> what addressing is that >> what i'm addressing is that starmageddon would be an equal catastrophe country, catastrophe for the country, as sunak tories regime has been, and the country needs to wake up and the country needs to wake up

i have they're moving to labour.d a conversation with anyone in the countryside where i live all the time, where they've suddenly gone. i think keir starmer's labour party are amazing want support amazing and i want to support them . i think this poll is just them. i think this poll is just a bit suspect and it has a little bit suspect and it has been reported in the national print press, but it's by a think tank founded by rachel reeves wes streeting lisa nandy, jon cruddas . labour together are who cruddas. labour together are who have decided to rescue the labour party post the 2019 election probably have a bit of an agenda and i think labour is trying to show themselves to be more attractive in the countryside than they actually necessarily are. >> oh, let's just take the poll at face for value a moment. >> first of all, i don't think it means that labour are popular in the countryside, just less unpopular than the conservatives. but it's a fascinating, if true, because we all remember, don't we, that tony blair

labour new labour have unveiled a nifty new onune labour have unveiled a nifty new online tool to taxyes, it's a tax calculator that'll tell you just how much. sorry folks. poorer you'll be. don't go anywhere >> you're listening to gb news radio . welcome radio. welcome back, everyone to state of the nation . state of the nation. >> yes, i'm richard tice , uh, >> yes, i'm richard tice, uh, and we've been discussing all sorts . we've been talking about sorts. we've been talking about the asylum backlogs, the nhs waste of potentially £1 billion. now, you sentenced some great thoughts here under mail. mogs janet says, well, it's quite simple. we should just go back to the system of paying gps for the number of patients they see, rather than the number on the list . janet, that's far too much list. janet, that's far too much like common sense. tim says exactly the same pay doctors for who they see, not the list. who they see, not what the list. there be millions of eu there must be millions of eu workers registered and return. tim, we bang on the money tim, could we bang on the money ther

labour party as well. think we all know. as kind of laymen on the street that keir starmer hasn't sealed the deal with the british public, _ which is why so much is, - to a certain extent up for grabs, whether it's an outright majority, how big that majority is. - so there is always an element - in some by—elections where labour is as much being put to the test as the tories _ well, that takes us to the prime minister, then. and what is his strategy? because last year, if i recall, he was the continuity. until he wasn't. and now he's the change candidate. well, he's kind of back to continuity again. i've lost track. it seems like that. is it reasonable... it seems like now — it seems to me, at least, that rishi sunak seems to be pivoting back towards a more traditional argument that those in his position often find themselves in — if your back�*s a bit against the wall but the party's been in powerfor a long time — which is you do a better the devil you know—type routine. do you really want to risk the oth

>> oh, labour. >> oh, labour. >> i'm a labour member for. >> i'm a labour member for. >> um. still won't vote for him . won't vote for him. >> i'm far prefer somebody >> no, i'm far prefer somebody else to win rather than the tories. >> uh, yes, i would . >> uh, yes, i would. >> uh, yes, i would. >> yeah, not really a very good job. >> but there's no one else to choose. >> unfortunately, unless something wonderful happens and somebody new pops up. but, uh , somebody new pops up. but, uh, it's the lesser of all the evils i >> -- >> um,i 5mm hum >> um, i think it's about time for a change. and uh, i would like to see what labour can do. >> i'd like someone else so i don't know, because it's all a shambles and it's all a mess. >> you know , it's . >> you know, it's. >> you know, it's. >> so probably the most positive message there for the conservatives was i don't think they've done a very good job, but there's no one else better. pretty stark message here in guildford today . will that play guildford today. will that play out at a general election ? we'll out at a general elect

next story labour party on tax? next story with over 300 flood warnings across england and wales and 1000 properties under water, we'll have all the latest on once again how storms and rain have wreaked havoc across sodden britain . our next story britain. our next story yesterday, it was revealed that a block of luxury flats in farnborough has been taken off the for market locals and instead given totally free to 300 odd male asylum seekers. we'll speak in this hour to two concerned locals for their reaction. then the next hour we'll speak to the head of the council who think this was dumped on the area by the home office , and finally , this is out office, and finally, this is out of jail. after 11 years. he's on parole at home for killing reeva reeva's mother says she will serve a life sentence for the loss of her daughter. the question is, why should he be freed? has he served his time ? freed? has he served his time? or is this another outrageous travesty of justice? all that coming up in the next hour. travest

5% going to labour. got about !5% going to labour. we've got nearly ! in 4 got about !. a larger number, by the way, are saying i don't know who to vote for. i'm not going to vote. i refuse to answer your question. so we've got a lot of conservatives out there who are telling me, as a pollster, chances are i'm going to stick at home, right? chances are i'm not even going to participate in the this is a big the election. and this is a big problem the problem for sunak. where's the big narrative? big motivational narrative? where's the big inspirational story about how he's going to change britain, how he's going to completely reshape the country? big, country? where's that big, compelling get off sofa at compelling get off your sofa at home and come out and vote conservative, because voters are clearly feeling it now. keir clearly not feeling it now. keir starmer certainly isn't setting the country fire. his the country on fire. his leadership ratings pretty leadership ratings are pretty flat. old saying flat. but as the old saying goes, governments, uh goes, right, gove

we've had by the division in the labour party labour colleague ve've had by the division in the labour division in the labour party labour colleague as bannau your labour colleague as bannau begum labelling by begum labelling the strikes by britain and america as dangerously . i mean, dangerously provocative. i mean, is she familiar with who the houthis are and what they're capable ? there still some capable of? there are still some fruitcakes labour party, fruitcakes in the labour party, aren't there? >> well, provocation is >> well, the provocation is obviously part of the obviously on the part of the houthis. the that houthis. they are the ones that chose to commercial chose to attack commercial shipping even more shipping and perhaps even more seriously , chose to attack hms seriously, chose to attack hms diamond, one our own vessels diamond, one of our own vessels carrying personnel diamond, one of our own vessels carrthere personnel diamond, one of our own vessels carrthere to personnel diamond, one of our own vessels carrthere to protect'sonnel diamond, one of our own vessels ca

— positioning, i will never let a labour government do what liz truss has done _ labour government doe to be careful and cautious — why we have to be careful and cautious about the stability, the fundamental rock that we need in our economy— fundamental rock that we need in our economy because as i said in the speech, — economy because as i said in the speech, what on earth are people supposed — speech, what on earth are people supposed to think when they are paying _ supposed to think when they are paying more money every month for their mortgage, sometimes hundreds of pounds _ their mortgage, sometimes hundreds of pounds every month and they look at the _ of pounds every month and they look at the television screen and see the architects _ at the television screen and see the architects of their misfortune swanning around the house of lords, you swanning around the house of lords, vou witt— swanning around the house of lords, you will never get that from a labour — you will never get that from a labour government. thank you very much _ labour government. thank you very much indeed a

do you think labour would?or a second. i think labour wants think their policies wants i think their policies open doors . i they've got open doors. i think they've got no control or to no plans to, to control or to halt illegal immigration or any kind of immigration. i think they agree that we know we have a elites in this country, a lot of elites in this country, and there's lot labour and there's a lot of labour people elites who people and there's elites who want immigration, less. want more immigration, not less. they back into the they want us to go back into the eu. they don't want britain to have own identity. they want have its own identity. they want an international identity. and i think they will make that happen by by opening the doors again, you know, do versity is fine, as is multiculturalism and as is immigration. but it cannot become the basis our national become the basis of our national identity . and that is because identity. and that is because that don't have one that means we don't have o

labour leader sir houthi rebels. labour leader sir keir starmer says while parliamentary approval should be sought in most armed interventions, there are exceptions . exceptions. >> difference between a limited targeted operation mission and a sustained campaign, usually involving troops on the ground involving troops on the ground in relation to the former, i think everybody understands that there are always going to be cases where in the national interest we have to act urgently , but where there's a sustained campaign, then yes, i do think parliament should be informed , parliament should be informed, should have a debate, should know the basis and should have the opportunity to vote . the opportunity to vote. >> the former home secretary has attended a rally marking ioo attended a rally marking 100 days since the october seventh massacre in israel . suella massacre in israel. suella braverman was among a crowd of thousands in london's trafalgar square calling for the release of hostages still being held by the ha