after all, they are represented by ambassadors, and this obviously indicates that they do not want labrov’s sit behind him at the same table in the security council and probably have joint photos. and serhiy lavrob’s speech itself was quite the same in general, the impression that russia was controversial was that it has a claim to everything, starting with the un itself and, of course , nato with collective action and even the secretary general, he was mentioned during his speech, and it was also the impression that russia is trying to quarrel with everyone. that is, i don’t know, the tactics are the same, and for example, saying that the western world is undermining the un , that multilateralism and diplomacy are also undermined by these initiatives of western countries regarding the organization of various forums, for example, the form of democracy, in particular, he specified the type and initiatives, therefore, in this context, i had the impression that he was simply trying to outwit everyone, and it is also interesting that he called the event such a western minority or a golden billi