his older brother didn't do much bet, lachlan, 34% against him.e did resign from his last executive role in 2005. as for rupert murdoch himself, the chairman and ceo of news corp did much better than his sons, only 14% of shareholders voted against the patriarch. overall not a great outcome for the murdochs but they will all still remain on news corp's board. here we see 47% of all the votes cast are held by the murdoch family or its staunch allies. 40% are in family hands, meantime, 7% of actually held by a saudi prince, the prince al waleed bin talal. they make up the remaining 53%, nonali nonaligned. if we took those out would we get a negative outlook. james murdoch's 35% no vote. if you take out those investors that were independent it would come out to this much. it would come out to 75% no vote against him. for lachlan, it would be 72% against him and as for rupert murdoch himself, well, that 14% would then go up to 30%. so you can see by these numbers, basically if it wasn't for the murdoch family's controlling share, james and lachlan pay