freed can touch on that. >> sure, jason freed, lafco staff. at the workshop they had about a week or two, this subject was brought and they did a full presentation. one thing i brought up at the comment period is that there are two ways that cca can actually help alleviate the budget short fall and that is if you were to rearrange the cc program so that all the things that were in the contract for shell to do to brought in house, perhaps there could be some savings on the operational side because the power side is on cca. if you are adding 30 mega watts of power, i don't think it would be that much of a load and you can shift to the cca the money for the cost and reducing the cost to shell. and there is a fund that everyone pays into their bill that puc can apply for it. i'm not convinced that puc would give it because there is not an operational program but there is money to give to the program. >>supervisor john avalos: so if shell is no longer involved, who is creating the energy? >> sfpuc has the staff and able to do that and when the rim

first once again thank you for the lafco for taking out the bold steps. we have had a couple moments like this in history where things got caught up and glad to see it moving forward. some quick technical notes. i think one thing that will really and we discussed it a little bit, i completely concur with exploring all possible actions with shell and without shell and other contractors like shell or do it in house which i think the advocates are most supportive of that. one thing that i have noticed is that we have not heard from the sfpuc or from any other source that i know of exactly what is going on right now with the shell contract. that was put on holdback in august and we have not heard. i think we should ask sfpuc to clarify what's going on with that. as far as the whole thing, i think the key here is that even if the sfpuc gets considerably more involved and starts doing it own work on build out and cleanpowersf and gets back in the game. i think back where we let them take the ball back. this is the moment where we need to lafco stay the drive of

freed can touch on that. >> sure, jason freed, lafco staff. at the workshop they had about a week or two, this subject was brought and they did a full presentation. one thing i brought up at the comment period is that there are two ways that

this is the moment where we need to lafco stay the drive of this. this is politics. the key with the sfpuc is that as an enterprise agency that is in charge of rate payers and keeping the system secure, they are mandated to be secure about this. lafco can really push the envelope in developing an rfp that will face the compliment crisis and we need to you keep this in-house. >>supervisor john avalos: thank you. >> hello commissioners. chad hose skin. we didn't hear too much about the cleanpowersf program. i was at the january 14th puc hearing and i strongly urge you to checkout the power enterprise budget information presented. a memo was available which i believe was the 14-15 two year planning cycle and indicated i think in one sentence that no work would be done on cleanpowersf by power enterprise. the focus seems to be on new high revenue customers and not on engagement. definitely a lot of information in those documents in terms of what the puc is thinking going forward and i don't think it do have dove tails what the lafco board is expecting. in-house schedulin

this is the december 13th 2013 meeting of the lafco for the city and county of san francisco our clerk is miss lisa miller could you please call the role. >> commissioner breed. >> present. >> commissioner mar. >> present. >> we do have a quorum. >> item number 2 is approval of the minutes for the september 27th 2013 regular meeting. >> i see no comments -- let's open this up for public comment is there anyone from the public who would like to speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> miss miller please call item number 3. >> the cleanpowersf program and the california public utilities commission and cleanpowersf energy efficiency and facilities and local jobs patrols strategies and. >> maybe thank you mr. chair typically we start the status with the status of the puc and barbara hail is here to provide that to you. >> thank you. most of our activities recently on the cca front for in puc proceedings where pg and e's green tariff option has continued to move forward. developing a green rate the statute requires a commission decision by july so we are expecting that the commissio

this plan that we're missing so i hope i'm being clear about that and i wanted to propose that at lafco because i wanted us to use the resources of lafco to try to prepare this and i also wanted to get feedback from my colleagues to get their thoughts so part of what i think is important in developing a plan is to make sure that when there are people who oppose it, which there will always be -- that we have clear answers so that we're communicating what the real accurate true message is and we know that it's a real message and we know that there's a real possibility for build out and real locationed for build outs and real possibilities for local jobs for unions and locals and how we're going to go about making it possible and making it a success because ultimately we want to make sure not only are there options but affordable options for power and we move more aggressively than we have in the past and that's pretty much what i wanted to say and hear feedback from my colleagues and of course members of the public on their thoughts on this. >> thank you very much i really appreciate the

item number 4. >> 2014 lafco schedule. >> great. miss miller. >> the appropriate schedule is before you under our bye laws. >> okay so we have a motion before we take action on the motion why don't we open it up to public comment. seeing none public comment is closed so we have a motion we can take that without objection. >> we can now go to the next item item number type of. >> executive officers report. >> there's no report at this time. >> no report is there any public comment on this item? seeing none public comment is closed. >> we can now go to item number 6. >> this is an opportunity for any members of the public to speak on any item that's not on the agenda. >> seeing no member of the public, public comment is closed. >> future agenda items. item number 7. >> is there anyone that would like to speak on any possible items? >> any member of the public? >> okay mr. brooks. >>

item number 4. >> 2014 lafco schedule. >> great. miss miller. >> the appropriate schedule is before you under our bye laws. >> okay so we h

item number 4. >> 2014 lafco schedule. >> great. miss miller. >> the appropriate schedule is before you under our bye laws. >> okay so we have a motion before we take action on the motion why don't we open it up to public comment. seeing none public comment is closed so

thanks, cal. >>> hi, jason freed, lafco staff. first off i wanted to start with a comment that chair avalos who is the supervisor wanted me to pass on to you today at the board of supervisors. he introduced a hearing request to find out why this report has not been issued yet, why it is still not public, why we cannot review it and also to start getting into some of the meat and bones of what's in it is part of the hearing request so we can start moving this forward. i think he was a little frustrated that we have been waiting at least now i believe two or three months for a report that has been done and been sitting there on the shelf ready to go and not been issued. i personally would love to see it issued this week so ms. nutter who put so much time and effort into what actually be part of the proceedings. hopefully she'll come back whenever it is released to celebrate that. getting into some of the comments specifically, the only part of this report that's actually available is what looks like table 2 of the executive summary.

sergeant lafco? stone cold sober of course and what he saw didn't look right, not to him. >> i keyed in on the gun that was in his right hand. argument it just didn't look like, it looked like it was placed there. >> narrator: the detective pushed rob for answers. >> it doesn't look like he committed suicide. and that's why i'm turning to you to help fill in some of the voids. >> wish i could. >> narrator: thing is, wasn't just the gun in lee's hand the officers noticed. it looked to them like somebody moved things around, particularly the body. >> somebody moved him. what do you feel happened? >> i don't believe i shot him. i would never shoot him. i loved him. we have never fought. we hadn't fought. i'm trying to remember as best i can. you know, i will say i don't remember everything. and it is -- it's -- and that's maddening in and of itself. >> by the end of the interviews with both belinda and with rob. what were you thinking about their stories, taken collectively? were there questions? >> abs

. >> okay >>> lack lafco >> >> >> >> >>

this is the december 13th 2013 meeting of the lafco for the city and county of san francisco our clerk is miss lisa miller could you please call the role. >> commissioner breed. >> present. >> commissioner mar. >> present. >> we do have