and when the republicans have power, the republicans have been in charge for some regular you lairty since 1994 is the government any smaller than it was? no guys, it's not. the bottom line is that even the republican party when they sit down to do a budget cannot shrink the government. they haven't been able to do it. >> john boehner got a $1.2 trillion ten year -- the largest in dollar terms and percentage. >> an it has been progressively put back because every time the republicans do these across the board. >> reality sets in. >> reality is fewer tsa agents. causing kay wros and guess what they put back the money. and the reality was guess what they put back the money and the republicans have failed time and time again for 30 years now and their own goal of cutting the federal government. >> take stuff back here. arguing about appropriations and appropriations are not going to happen. in fact they're probably not going to have a lame duck either. when i'm saying budget it's a partisan document that does not need the support of a single democrat. 200 different votes that are probab

and when the republicans have power, the republicans have been in charge for some regular you lairty since 1994 is the government any smaller than it was? no guys, it's not. the bottom line is that even the republican party when they sit down to do a budget cannot shrink the government. they haven't been able to do it. >> john boehner got a $1.2 trillion ten year -- the largest in dollar terms and percentage. >> an it has been progressively put back because every time the republicans do these across the board. >> reality sets in. >> reality is fewer tsa agents. causing kay wros and guess what they put back the money. and the reality was guess what they put back the money and the republicans have failed time and time again for 30 years now and their own goal of cutting the federal government. >> take stuff back here. arguing about appropriations and appropriations are not going to happen. in fact they're probably not going to have a lame duck either. when i'm saying budget it's a partisan document that does not need the support of a single democrat. 200 different votes that are probab

didn't want to risk the fop lairty. if been more naturally confident and less moody of afternoon nation in some ways maybe he would have done it differently. >> could it have anything anything to do with his -- admiration of the great railroad tycoon that -- now talking about major financial institution but these very smart people who were creating, running major financial institutions. couldn't get it young? >> i think there's a bit of that. i think there's a trend in his mental history. which has to do with jpmorgan that when he was a jazz player and there was a break between sets he would be reading economic history for fun. including the story of -- you know, moore begun and creation of the morgan bank in late 20s early 20th century with a reverence that only grew when he was appointed to director of the company and he sat on his board in the 19, late 70s and early 80s and jpmorgan was the perfect example of that slightly conservative careful professional, nonflashy kind of bank i think that that image of her financ