landis believes that there was a second shooter and kennedy's real killer remains unnamed.t. this may change the conclusions, and i mean the main conclusions. i think it will change. why were you silent for so long? it was a difficult ordeal, i just walked away from it, i just didn’t want to talk. and not only him. doctors of the hospital where the american president was brought, announcing. kennedy first described his injuries in detail. was a hole in the throat and another large one in the right occipital part of the head. once the bullet entered the throat, they again shot from the front, but at the warren commission, which examined all the circumstances of the murder, dr. perry suddenly changed his testimony, saying that the front hole looked like an exit hole, why? cbs shows an interview with peri's colleague, who was approached at the same press conference by a man, either from the fbi or from the secret service. this someone told me. unless you wish yourself harm, you should never say again that it was an incoming bullet wound. however, this confession of dr. mclella

according to landis, in a state of shock, he picked her up and then left her in...he operating room, walked into the corner, leaned against the operating table on which the body of president gennedy lay, and i spontaneously decided that the bullet should be here. landis believes that there was a second shooter and kennedy's real killer remains unnamed. i found a bullet that was thought to be lost. this may change the conclusions, and i mean the main conclusions. i think it will change. why did you take so long, i just didn’t want to talk. and not only him. where the american president was brought, announcing kennedy's death, they first described his injuries in detail. there was a hole in the throat and another large one in the right occipital part of the head. once the bullet entered the throat, they again shot from the front, but at the vorenus commission, who was examining all the circumstances of the murder, dr. perry suddenly changed his testimony, saying that the front hole looked like an exit hole, why? cbs shows an interview with peri's colleague, who was ap

with landis's revelation it contradiktss conclusion in the warren commission. disappointed it took so long to come out. >> brian: from what you study and present as possibilities, do you believeos -- oswalt was involve? ed >> with this and the new evidence coming out, which is on cable now, i strongly disinclined to believe that oswald was involved. >> brian: eyewitnesses at the time, it is on youtube, they were pointing toward the grassy knoll. people say that is the way the sound bounced off the building. did you find that? >> well, if you take a look, there are scores of people going toward the so-called grassy knoll, which would indicate there is someone shooting from the front. all right. now as far as this echo correlation, there really does, that effect really doesn't exist in daily plaza because it is an open sided on the other side, it is not completely surrounded by walls, which is what you need if you want echo kind of thing. >> brian: thanks so much, appreciate it, we will continue to pursue this. 60 years later and so many questions. r.f.k. was on

he was with sarah landy. you had a chance to speak with her today. why is she important to him in this trip? >> so, it was interesting. i was able to catch up with her on zoom. but she had to hurry and get to dinner with president xi jinping. not many folks get to say that, let alone americans here in the u.s. but she's been flown here to attend that dinner. i think it's important because of optics. it doesn't take away from what friendship and relationship they might have. but this is important for president xi as he's trying to win over u.s. businesses and trying to persuade them to come back into china if they've left or to expand their reach within china. sarah describes this relationship. >> i am an old friend of xi jinping. and that's why i was invited to come. and even in 201 when he walked in the door, there was a big smile that there is just a wonderful feeling between the peoples that we care about each other. >> so, i've never really heard anybody describe president xi jinping in such a personal manner. he's very low key and not a lot of t

. >>> i want to go to sarah landy. she's had an unexpected relationship with the chinese president. they first met, where he hosted a dinner at her home in iowa. she had a green bean casserole with xi jinping. she was 31 years old at the time. he went to iowa to see how americans farm. landy was the head of a volunteer organization called sister states, just founded that year to connect iowaen to the rest of the world. she made several trips to china over the years. xi came back to visit again. and then together again last night, and had a private meeting. she joins me now. sarah, i think it's incredible for anyone watching, with someone of such consequence, that you would know someone like this over so many years, so well, 40 years nearly you have known him. how do you square words like dictator with the man who you have come to know in your lifetime? >> well, one thing is, i think it's too bad that one word throws people off. you know, i think, you know, in china there's one person that makes most of the decision, that's xi jinping. i don't know i would call him a dictator. he's i

would point at the eligibility cases in our response, the case from 2016 and cases from 2022, the landis and fisher case. one point about those is there is little interest in those cases to decide who committed an error. in monahan error does not arise. it's a big deal in 204. a longer question in a law class might be who committed an error? petitioners always say the secretary committed an error. wrong. they always say it, they are always wrong and yet in these cases it does not matter because -->> and i ask you about the timing issue? is it at the time of the placing on the ballot or from the time the person will be taking office? >> the time that balloting is taking place because that is what the court has. petitioner's comments were correct i thought. the way they put that was right. with regard to the text, the monahan case and landis and fisher make it clear that the court understands in a ballistic big ideas sense that the court has jurisdiction, legal authority to deal with the situation when you've got an ineligible person and it is the secretary's position that this is the righ

landis believes that there was a second shooter and kennedy's real killer remains unnamed.nother large one in the right occipital parts of the head. once the bullet entered the throat, they again shot from the front, but at the warren commission, which examined all the circumstances of the murder, dr. perry suddenly changed his testimony, saying that the front hole looked like an exit hole, why? cbs shows: an interview with a colleague of peri, who was approached at the same press conference by a person, either from the fbi or from the secret service, this someone told me, if you do not wish harm to yourself, you should never speak again that it was a wound from an incoming bullet, however, this confession of dr. mclelland was shown only 4 years after his death, the topic could have been closed completely by examining kennedy’s brain, it was stored in the national archive, but the most important evidence was missing, it turns out on one side the words of the presidential guard... the meaning, on the other is the official version, according to which a magic bullet wounded ke

landis .landis. he saw directly behind where the president had been sitting on top of the seat , it pristine top of the seat, it pristine bullet that had been just sitting there . and he picked it sitting there. and he picked it up and took it into parkland and left it with the president's body. and trauma room one. this is the so called magic bullet that people have talked about for 60 years. this is some of the biggest news since the warren commission , and it really warren commission, and it really disproves that. what's called the single bullet theory, that one bullet went through jfk and then governor connally and then hit governor connally and caused all his injuries , caused all his injuries, including breaking bones. major bones, without having any damage . in fact, it hit jfk in the back and it likely fell out when he was hit with the final blast . he was hit with the final blast. or jackie, you can he was hit with the final blast. orjackie, you can see, has her or jackie, you can see

that is what set off this collision course of this plane on a collision course with a landi lan landingsna citation. the head of the ntsb said it could have been so much worse. >> it only takes one missed warning to become a tragedy, one incorrect response. these incidents must serve as a wake-up call before something nor catastrophic occurs. >> we're also learning from the ntsb more about the houston incident. the air traffic controller told the accelerating plane to stop twice. in fact, the controller beat it by a few seconds. today senators pushed for that to go to even more airports nationwide, brianna. the f.a.a. says there's a bit of a silver lining. the good news is this has led to a lot of transparency, agency groups coming together, but really there needs to be zero close calls like this, the only acceptable number is nothing. >> of course. amazing how close that was. thank goodness. the agency obviously needs more air traffic controllers, too. >> no doubt. there's a huge shortage. the faa wants to hire about 3,000 air traffic controllers, but we heard a startling number today.

landis has written in his book cannot be true. >> do you think he's being dishonest or has a differentoncern to me >> conspiracy theories are now conspiracy facts. >> reporter: hill also takes issue with how director oliver stone's feature film and documentary about the assassination have further fueled those theories. >> it was not fact it was fiction if you're going to make it fiction, announce it that way. this is a made-up story. don't tell people that this is fact when it's not and that's what he has done. >> did he ever call you? >> no. and don't bother now it is too late for that junk >> hill says he's accepted that his actions on that day will likely be how he's remembered. >> what does that acceptance look like or mean to you >> well, people keep thanking me for what i did i appreciate that very much. but i didn't complete my task, which was to save the president's life and that's what's bothered me all these years, 60 years now. the job was to keep the president alive and safe, and i was not able to do that. >> your legacy, what do you want it to be >> well, i just -- you kno

with regard to the text, the monahan case and landis and fisher make it clear that the court understands in a ballistic big ideas sense that the court has jurisdiction, legal authority to deal with the situation when you've got an ineligible person and it is the secretary's position that this is the right statute, the court has the authority in favor of either party. >> can i ask one question? the republican national committee point out that if the statute works the way petitioners are saying it works it gives secretary of state an awful lot of power to determine who is qualified or not qualified to be on the ballot and with little to no due process, no opportunity for a candidate to challenge the determination and so should we be concerned? >> i think that is a legitimate criticism of the petitioners perspective on the powers of the secretary but that is the main point of disagreement between secretary and petitioners. the secretary's position is he does not have the authority to determine on his own that a candidate for president is ineligible in the name is not going on the ballot. th

terry, joey, and sister ro mo and the sisters of perpetual indulgence and the district and mary and landis of another district, and billy of the country club and i think i'm leaving some folks out which manny will make sure, i got everybody. he could not be here today but i wanted to thank thompson harvey and officers of mission station for the plan that kept visitors safe. and i did want to thank adam who does not get a certificate because he works for me. >> well thank you, board of supervisors and i have the honor of being part of this incredible group this cast of characters here. and all i want to thousands of dollars went into small businesses that needed it. we can talk about the thousands of people that came through, the castro theater. one sexiest costume, we're not going to talk about that, we're going to talk about the process that we went through to get to this is something that i'm really proud of. and sometimes they happen, and sometimes they don't. so i had individual conversations have every one here. and then i gaurtd people together in harvey's milk coffee shop. and we al

terry, joey, and sister ro mo and the sisters of perpetual indulgence and the district and mary and landis of another district, and billy of the country club and i think i'm leaving some folks out which manny will make sure, i got everybody. he could not be here today but i wanted to thank thompson harvey and officers of mission station for the plan that kept visitors safe. and i did want to thank adam who does not get a certificate because he works for me. >> well thank you, board of supervisors and i have the honor of being part of this incredible group this cast of characters here. and all i want to thousands of dollars went into small businesses that needed it. we can talk about the thousands of people that came through, the castro theater. one sexiest costume, we're not going to talk about that, we're going to talk about the process that we went through to get to this is something that i'm really proud of. and sometimes they happen, and sometimes they don't. so i had individual conversations have every one here. and then i gaurtd people together in harvey's milk coffee shop. and we al