stomach tom covid who send her langford nose passed away about a month and a half ago a great loss to our country and state someone will always celebrate here first dedication is commitment really the example he set by the presiding officer is livefi and well when asked if i'd go ahead and proceed my comments? >> mr. president cement i rise the today following i went to sifting into saturday langford good friends we set together in committees in fact he succeeded tom in the u.s. set it when he was leaving he said i'm leaving but you get some beam better than me and his name is james langford. i don't know that is any better but a worthy successor. he served with you i think you know that. i spent a lot of my time here we differ or disagree series we can agree. sometimes it may not see ida i on every single policy but we ought to agree on thenk principle among the principles as we approach 4.0 the next major legislation were dealing with i hope one of the points we can agree to state and local governments are having massive losses of revenue that are attributable to this coronas, crisi

that is what in oklahoma senator james langford about this and much more. ♪ ♪ ♪ to ewhether you'reting these uncaring for your. family at home or those at work, principal is by your side. we're working hard to answer your questions. like helping you understand what the recently passed economic package can mean for you. we're more than a financial company. we're a "together we can get through anything" company. now, more than ever. melissa: newly revealed house intelligence documents show the top lawyer for hillary linton's campaign admitting that, yeah, they were aware he knew that british x by christopher steel was talkinghi to reporters at the washington post, new york times, cnn about his steel dossier during the campaign. did the hillary campaign tell that they were paid for that file? let's take it to oklahoma senator james langford. senator, great to have you on. i mean, this is a steady river of information coming out of house intelligence. you know, media leaks setting the stage for impeachment. feels like we are still at the beginning. we still do

that is what in oklahoma senator james langford about this and much more. ♪ limu emu & doug [ siren ] give me your hand! i can save you... lots of money with liberty mutual! we customize your car insurance so you only pay for what you need! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ tums ver(bell rings)la stick when heartburn hits fight back fast... ...with tums chewy bites... beat heartburn fast tums chewy bites melissa: newly revealed house intelligence documents show the top lawyer for hillary linton's campaign admitting that, yeah, they were aware he knew that british x by christopher steel was talkinghi to reporters at the washington post, new york times, cnn about his steel dossier during the campaign. did the hillary campaign tell that they were paid for that file? let's take it to oklahoma senator james langford. senator, great to have you on. i mean, this is a steady river of information coming out of house intelligence. you know, media leaks setting the stage for impeachment. feels like we are still at the beginning. we st

thanksgiving -- thank you. >> centre langford? >> -- senator langford? >> let me go down more, because this is what my question was about. we found it difficult to hold into account. some of them, a chance to walk through, there's a great story about two more romanians, basically living like the kardashians, stealing bitcoin for people all over the world. they were just basically buying on the dark web information and putting out ransomware. they happen to hit on some on pennsylvania avenue through our security cameras, and president trump's inauguration, took over some security cameras. it was an international incident from two folks from romania who didn't even. know what they had they were able -- we were able to get to them and arrest of. but many questions, whether india or south america or europe, we have actors that are doing this and have increasing difficulty to hold them to account. a lot of our conversations are about nationstates, what recommendations do you have about individual actors and to work with nationstates within their country? what

>> alright let's turn to senator langford, are you on i know you had another call? senator hawley are you available. >> sim mr. chairman. thank you very much. thank you again for doing this and thank you to all the witnesses for being here. can i just start with you and go back for a moment to the british parliament. we know that the british parliament is moving towards a virtual parliament and i'm wondering what are some lessons we think that the u.s. congress can learn from the british experience as far. >> the british experience this far has involved the use of remote proceedings that something that was quite suited to the remote proceedings and that was prime minister questions, they did a hybrid proceeding and some members there although a significant majority were notth present. but nevertheless prime minister's question with the kind of thing that was not by remote proceeding mechanism. so that's it they did. and the idea was that they would begin with that in phase and other aspects of the legislator procedures of the house of commons as it became apparent t

let's turn to senator langford. are you on? i know you had another call? ?enator hawley hawley: thank you for doing this. let's go back to a moment -- for a moment to the british parliament. moving to a are virtual parliament. what are some lessons the americans could learn from that >> that was something that was quite suited to those remote proceedings. they had some members there. a significant number of the members were not present. kind of thing that was not unduly complex to do. that is what they did. the idea was that they would begin with that. as it became apparent that those things were technologically feasible and can be managed. that is exactly the point i wanted to make. for congressessary to do everything it ought to do right at the same time. are things that can be attuned to a remote vote. that doesn't mean you should start someplace. the reason i said that maybe we should take some care in terms of amending senate rules that have a more permanent character and look to the possibility of perhaps expanding this so it can be done on them more e

but tom coburn as he was leaving he said you're getting someone better than me and that is james langford. worthy successor i thank you know that i spend a lot of my time here but we differ or disagree and we like to say that sometimes we don't see eye to eye on every policy but we agree on the principles and with the four.oh the next major legislation but the state and local governments are having lots of revenue attributable to this crisis and to give a couple of examples the trust fund but i'm told by secretary of transportation it's over 50 percent. >> is not just delaware to build those roads and bridges to have the service transportation they are getting destroyed with that infrastructure so that scenario and then how they are doing and the revenue stream and then actually say where's the revenue but then we can find agreement that those governments are entering cost that directly relateov to the pandemic and healthcare providers and like orderlies. first responders and to help so we have an obligation and then to focus on retraining programs like i too many businesses will not reop

his father and pops to see only one solution langford's this city big story in the long run the only way is through the people who live here through the communities that need to gain something from the animals but if you're busy. why should i protect something that means nothing to me and from which i draw no benefit. benefits can mean workplace food prospects for the future but these have to be created otherwise it will be impossible to solve this problem lucas is too much for me then on dividend to far wild animals are of no value to the local population they will not protect them it's an imagined that the poachers arrive through the villages however if the villagers are already very much aware of the value of these animals and the poachers will not find a home there this means that the value of the animals is fundamental to the survival of nature conservation. the income from photo tourism creates this value. but not every area is suitable for this. even if pictures like these regularly cause outrange trophy hunting can be an effective means to promote you know welfare . but the r

senators langford and portman also sent a letter asking the same. the president has not responded.n more than 30 days and they are ignoring them. that is a sign where congress has got to step up and say we gave you your chance, you are not doing what the laws demanding of you. now we need to pass a law that ensures when you want to fire one that we have recourse. host: what would that recourse be? guest: giving that inspector general some rights in the court. for the caller who was concerned this was just about trump and obama, president obama early in his first term removed an inspector general. at that time there was bipartisan outrage. they took the case the court. the courts ruled he did not have standing. that is the kind of thing that can be resolved in legislation. host: he didn't have standing because there was nothing on the books? guest: that's right. host: gilbert, arizona. caller: i can't believe the last comments. the president has the option to fire anyone who works for him. these generals were people he decided to get rid of. it is that simple. obama did it, now pres

senators langford and portman also sent a letter asking the same. the president has not responded. it has been more than 30 days , i think well more, and they are ignoring them. that is a sign where congress has got to step up and say we gave you your chance, you are not doing what the law is demanding of you. now we need to pass a law that you want a fire one, that we have some recourse. host: what would that recourse be? guest: that is where we are talking about having specific standards for when a president can remove an inspector general and also giving that inspector general some rights in the court. for the caller who was concerned this was just about the trump administration and the obama administration president obama , early in his first term removed an inspector general. at that time, there was real bipartisan outrage. the inspector general took the case to court. the court ruled he did not have standings. this is the kind of thing they can be resolved in legislation. host: he didn't have standing because there was nothing on the books to protect him. guest: that's right.

. >> reporter: this is george's defense attorney, robert langford. >> there is absolute reasonable doubte tiaffay's involvement in this case. >> reporter: those surveillance videos, for example, that the prosecution found so damning? none of the hammers they bought was the actual murder weapon. and besides, most of what they bought together was simple -- and innocent camping gear. george helping a man in need, as usual. >> he thought he was helping out noel stevens to live out where noel wanted to live, which was outside of town. >> reporter: as for the 87 phone calls the prosecution said proved george and greyhound had conspired to kill shauna, there was nothing sinister there, said the defense, just a man trying to contact his charity case handyman. >> i live out in that area. and cell service is notoriously bad. on top of -- have you ever tried to call a handyman in this town? it is ridiculously difficult to get hold of those kinds of workers to come do work. >> reporter: in fact, said the defense, the only thing the state had tying george to the murder was noel stevens's word. >> wit

we will speak with a member of the senate homeland security committee, senator james langford of oklahomaxt. this is hal. this is hal's heart. it's been broken. and put back together. this is also hal's heart. and his relief, knowing he's covered by blue cross blue shield. and this is our promise, with over 80 years of healthcare expertise: to be here for you now. and always. this is medicare from blue cross blue shield. this is the benefit of blue. >> in many places, it appears the violence is planned, organized, and driven by anarchist and left extreme groups, far left extremist groups, using antifa like tactics, many of whom travel from outside the state to promote the violence. jon: that's attorney general william barr with some strong words about who is behind the violence in the nationwide protests we're seeing. he says it is being carried out by far left extremists like antifa. i'm jon scott. this is a special edition of fox report. the president tweeting the united states of america will be designating antifa as a terrorist organization. let's bring in oklahoma senator james lankf

your west at 16, a look at let hayward livermore, is a failure between onshore and offshore. 39 langford, 41 santa rosa, napa 40, that is napa airport, 48 to berkeley, to 50 now, that is 11 degrees spread between 4:00 in the morning at 7:00 because the fog came in. 54 and second mentor, 55 monterey and some of that low cloud, is in the coast, there will be much warmer there. 60s at the coast, as 70s basic, did so go some 80s inland, but we may come down a little bit, because of inland temps are already running warmer. some coastal locations are running cooler. wednesday and thursday though, thursday restart that warm-up into friday, a cooldown starts sunday into early next week. >> thank you. time is 7:11 in washington for the first time in more than a month, the u.s. senate is back on capitol hill. the big concern for almost half of the senators and what some leaders say they should be focused on. and a honeymoon in handcuffs. after the break, why a newlywed couple from the sacramento area was arrested. and the charges against them. >>> welcome back. it is 7:14. the coronavirus crisis m

portman langford and also sent a letter asking the same. the president has not responded.t has been more than 30 days and they are ignoring them. that is a sign where congress has got to step up and say we gave you your chance, you are not doing what the laws demanding of you. now we need to pass a law that when you want to fireto one that we have recourse. [no audio] guest: giving that inspector general some rights in the court. who was concerned this was just about trump and obama early int his first term removed an inspector general. at that time there was bipartisan outrage. they took the case the court. the courts ruled he did not have standing. that is the kind of thing that can be resolved in legislation. host: he didn't have standing because there was nothing on the books? guest: that's right. host: gilbert, arizona. caller: i can't believe the last comments. to president has the option fire anyone who works for him. were people he decided to get rid of. it is that simple. obama did it, now president trump did it. it doesn't matter if obama did it first or if trump

deb in white plains, new york, is next on the langford democrats.d morning -- on the line for democrats. deb, are you with us? you have to stick by your phone. we will go to brooklyn, new york. this is billy also on the line for democrats. caller: i would just like to debunks the caller that said barack obama is a shia muslim. this is a conspiracy theory that islamaphobic. i want to call out the hysterical xenophobia of the policy.ng and the he exempts them from his immigration ban. the immigration ban makes no sense as coherent policy. it is all about keeping brown people out of the country and all about xenophobia, fear of the other, which is at the core of republican politics. if trump were so scared about disease, why would he accept foreign guest workers and exempt them from his travel ban? i wanted to call up the right-wing for the conspiracy theories. the right-wing demagogues about -- host: billy, got your point, appreciate the point. we just have a few minutes left with martha kumar. guest: immigration actually has been a lightning rod kind

i know you, josh holly, rick scott, james langford, you're upset about this and say they violated theust don't qualify for it. there's something called independence between affiliate and parent company each affiliate is allowed to apply on their own. in this particular case in order to be a planned parenthood affiliate you have to get approval of the parent board the one located in washington d.c. a parent board or organization that is sitting on according to their own numbers in 2018 close to half a billion dollars in net assets. half a billion dollars in net assets to a large well-funded organization, in washington d.c. who has to, who controls the operation of these affiliate s. they just don't qualify under the affiliate rules it's as simple as that. leave aside all of the other issues they do not qualify so they need to return the money and if they did this knowingly they need to be held accountable and whoever helped them needs to be held accountable that includes potentially people on the staff. ainsley: you know they're not going to return the money and hire big lawyers to rep

. >>> plus, two lawmakers from opposite sides of the aisle, senators james langford and dick durbin willur guests. "morning joe" will be back in two minutes. r guests. "morning joe" will be back in two minutes. for nearly 100 years, we've worked to provide you with the financial strength, stability, and online tools you need. and now it's no different. because helping you through this crisis is what we're made for. >>> yes, will some people be affected? yes if t yes. will some people be affected badly? yes. we have to get our country open and open soon. >> do you believe that's the reality we're facing, that lives will be lost to reopen the country? >> it's possible there will be some because you won't be locked into an apartment or house or whatever it is. but at the same time we're going to practice social distancing, we're going to be washing hands, we're going to be doing a lot of the things that we've learned do over the last period of time. and we have to get our country back. i'm viewing our great citizens of this country to a certain extent and to a large extent as warriors. they

and senate republicans, it's not just ron johnson, it will be rand paul, it will be james langford, itoting for this subpoena today, the first subpoena that this committee issue issing committee issuing in 2020. it's a repeat of 2016. it's exactly what house republicans did to hillary clinton with the benghazi select committee. they believe as they do now, if they say enough times hunter biden, burisma, that it will be enough to taint the campaign. >> but donny deutsch, even with dirty politics, isn't that time, place, man center what ner? what do the democrats do with this? is there an opportunity here? >> i don't think they have to do anything. let the republicans go down this strategic rabbit hole. you know, by june there will be 113,000 people die from the virus. we know it's probably coming back in the fall. 30 million people out of jobs. do they think the american voter is that stupid, is that out of touch with their own needs and their own survival that they think something about the other candidate's son in a business dealing has anything to do with what matters to them in life

interestingly enough the co-chair of that are chris coons the democrat from delaware and james langfordoma. if he is going to be thorough and complete in his senate records, they should also call upon the senate ethics committee to look at their records. pete: yeah, you know, guys, if joe biden has lost the "new york times" editorial board, he has some serious problems. here is the headline from the "new york times." investigate tara reade's allegations. remember they worked weeks to not cover this story. now they have to. here's a quote from that article. mr. biden's word is insufficient to dispel the cloud. the democrat national committee should move to investigate the matter swiftly and thoroughly with the full cooperation of biden campaign. jillian, it's pretty tough for joe biden to have both sides of the me too movement. he said certain things about believing the essence of what women had to say in 2018. now he is face ago claim. we can't know who is telling the truth. we can't. that's what's frustrating about moments like this absent evidence. if you are going to have one standar