[speaking foreign language] >> -- song young-moo: [speaking foreign language] i have no doubt in my mindt these issues will be resolved through the strength of the alliance, as we have done in the past. song young-moo: [speaking foreign language] interpreter: after world war ii, the alliance relationship that south korea and the united states share, and has been a key factor in terms of geoeconomics, geopolitics, history and military. this is an alliance that is exemplary and firm about other alliances in the world. song young-moo: [speaking foreign language] and i have a humble dream to add another storm on -- stone on top of this great alliance for this brick-and-mortar. song young-moo: [speaking foreign language] interpreter: starting now, i will engage in honest conversations with you in this dialogue, and as a military man, and as a navy/marine gentleman. i hope today's conference is well. thank you verys: much minister. thank you members of the press very much for coming. >> the president this morning tweeted that talking is not the answer. what solutions could be taken? what addit

] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speakinggn language ] >> nbc news in-depth the struggle over a little boy. >> even his new puppy came from a member of congress. >> on sunday castro demanded the u.s. return the boy within 72 hours. >> no one has the right to steal the boy from his father. >> the white house doesn't want this to become a big international incident. >> america has determined enemies who hate our values. >> we've just begun to fight. >> of course i would rather grow up in the united states, but there may be other considerations there. >> cuban officials promising twice as many protesters today as this country unites around the powerful symbol of a 6-year-old child caught between two worlds. " shanahan fakes left. she's outside of the key, she shoots... ...she scores! uh... yes, erin, it is great time to score a deal. we need to make room for the 2018 models. relive the thrill of beating the clock. the volkswagen model year end event. hurry in for a $1,500 in available bonuses and 0% apr 60 months on a new 2017 j

elian. ♪ ♪ [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] was, in fact, dedicated to getting that little boy home. and it became a matter of his heart. it was not now just a government victory. and elian became virtually like a child of his. >> as elian grew up, fidel continued to celebrate the boy's return as a triumphant chapter in the larger story of cuba's revolution. [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] >> i don't know what elian's life is like now in cuba. he's more prominent probably than he ever imagined he would be, but whatever he is on that island, it was created here. it was created here in miami. >> in hindsight, elian gonzales affair had a lot of impact because it became a pivotal point for many in the community to realize that we were not having a rational approach 0 cuba, that it was getting out of hand than we needed to show a different view, a different approach. getting out of hand th needed to show a different

[speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] ♪ [speaking foreigngo to college. he was going to have the american dream. but, you know, in the end, realized that american dream wasn't for him. >> as he lives out his life, what role he will play in cuba, what role he will play in the cuban revolution, that is to come inevitably. he will be part of the new generation, and how he will weather that, how he will respond to that is probably partly related to what will happen to cuba, and some of that depends on us. ♪ ♪ [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [ chanting ] >>> i shouldn't be happy because a person has died but he's separated my family, my parents never got to see cuba again so today i rejoice for this. ♪ ♪ >> as cuban americans celebrated fiddle's death, miami talk shows replaced elian's comments and revisited a long-running question. what sort of man had the miracle boy become? [ speaking foreign language ] >>> we always said that's what he would become, a little trophy for the government when they soo that they roll out wh

foreign language] >> is not just the net and fishing techniques that are controversial however. working undercovever, ontold us many who u unload at the plant e often under licensing agreements. >> she claims her company is a prominent company in thailand, which produces mucuch of the fee that is eveventually fit to consumers in north america and europe. we also uncovered evidence to suggest that if wrigley operates legally in foreign waters. our research found that these modern-day pirates used to fishing technology in the waters all across asia. they're searching for more valuable fish species. >> [speaking foreign language] >> the industrial strength culture in thailand -- it is driving illegal this trafficking and across southeast asia to the global shrimp industry continues to rebrand itself as sustainable, but this film raises important questions about the poor agriculture andnd the y ingredients used to grow them. there is the precious marine biology diversity. also in restaurants a and sold n stores, troropical prawns are popular choiceces of food across the western worl

can you elaborate on your view of how language codes stranded your talk of it about language? >> while i don't think there's any language that would really help us understand a journalism as a visceral level. the idea that the future and past are just as real as the ash president i think people who hold to a journalism can only do so in an intellectual abstract fashion. i don't know that we are capable of freely feeling it and letting it. i don't think human consciousness is capable of really embracing a journalism and i think all language is going to reflect the fact that we live in the present. it's interesting like animals that lack language i think we i would say they only have knowledge of the present.se humans perhaps as a result maybe not as a result of humans have language and we have knowledge of the past as being something different and the future as being something different than the present and that is something animals do not have a. and the different ways that our language can reflect our awareness the past and future i think different languages to offer differen

] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreign language] [speaking foreignas he lives out his life, what role he will play in cuba, what role he will play in the cuban revolution, that is to come inevitably, he'll be part of the new generation and how he will weather that, how he will respond to that is probably partly related to what will happen to cuba and some of that depends on us. ♪ ♪. [speaking foreign language]. [speaking foreign language]. >>> i shouldn't be happy because a person has died but he's separated my family, my parents never got to see cuba again so today i rejoice for this. >> as cuban americans celebrated fid fidel's deaths, they replayed his comments. what sort of man had the miracle boy become? [speaking foreign language]. >>> we always said that's what he would become, a little trophy for the government when they roll out whatever they need to. >> people have told me did you hear what elian say? he's brainwashed. i say he's not a fault of what he's become where he's at right now, he doesn't know any better. so i don't judge him, i jus

in science is a language.at's what math and the laws of physics do. they take a more eternal view. she asked the question i think that there is a way to treat that which do not necessarily imply eternalism . i think that the laws of physics do that. >> there is another form of communication that does not necessarily or that allows you to have a sense of time or process and it is active looking at a work of art. your i will inevitably roll over it and find different things and different connections which then register in a different sense and understanding. yes, it is through the passage of time so that it can always be re-channeled and challenged in the process of that particular communication from artist to viewer. and so i would encourage everybody to go upstairs in the galleries and check it out and see what happens. it could be kind of a cool experience. we are open on fridays until 10:00 p.m. so you can engage in that but i'm sure that before you do you will stagger up six flights of stairs. laden with th

of the welsh language society. it isa interest, it should not be allowed. it is a classic liberal position. no one should be discouraged from speaking welsh. everyone should be allowed to speak welsh. you can see how many choose to speak it and how many have had as a hobby and who had it as their main language, companies that use it, is there not something to say about that position? everyone should be able to pick it up naturally and get on with it. they may say it is not for me, why do i have to pick it up if i do not want to? leave it to them. languages are the easiest thing to learn. of —— aren't. people need help. for as long as i have been alive, the welsh government has encouraged people to learn welsh. i have had encouragement and lessons at school. but i did not pick it up enough. mining education was not enough. there needs to be a bigger push to make sure people learn it every day. but is the key. you can go to a welsh school and come out of it and you cannot speak welsh. what is the point in all of the

speaks own language. a race against time. a language on the brink. at 84, she and her older sisters are trying to preserve the language of their childhood — now acknowledged by the un as severely at risk. committed to this promise, catriona has turned her house in the northern cape into a school. for a few hours a week, local children come here to learn the 112 distinct sounds and 45 different clicks of njuu. like many other african languages, it's been passed down orally through generation and that has threatened its survival. to stop it being consigned to the history books, catriona and her family have joined with linguists to create an alphabet and basic rules of grammar — the beginnings of a documented language. she is working hard to make sure that their language outlives them. but her reach is restricted to these walls. about three hours from here, though, another indigenous community is looking to modern means for the answer. here in springbuck, dina's radio show connects 70,000 nama speakers across the continent. the era of apartheid left the

i think it's important that we speak different languages.demic. we speak thai and hindi because we've lived in those places. if you are not going to live in those places, it's not much use to you. when i was young we did not have the opportunity to learn languages and i look back now and i think orchids should have it, they definitely should have it. we're joined now by kirsty heimerl—moggan, a course leader in interpreting and translation at the university of central lancashire and by entrepreneur guy blaskey. thank you both are coming in. sky, you are an entrepreneur, you speak a couple of languages yourself, they have been crucial presumably to your success ? have been crucial presumably to your success? i think they have been to date, but a lot has changed now. u nfortu nately, date, but a lot has changed now. unfortunately, although i am a language graduate, i don't think they are that relevant as they have beenin they are that relevant as they have been in the past. why? i want with a —— i went for a talk with google recently. what we

>> i said earlier that he, he met strong language with strong language.was he is not doing the job we need him to do, go to the security briefings and to talk with the the joint chiefs of staff. trish: i think you heard from everyone involved, a consistent message, a message that this is not going to be tolerated. and however you want to say that, however strongly it needs to be said, so be it. adam johnson, quickly the market off 74 points. do you, put it, put some perspective on it for us, very quickly? 74 is not a whole lot. >> market is taking this beautifully in stride. you would expect the market to be down on a day news headlines. would expect gold to be happening. taking it in stride. we have earnings and employment in the country. that is the story that is driving stocks. trish: economy still good, i'm very happy. we're all very happy. this is a situation that needs to get resolved and rhetoric may play a role. i'll be right back. otaled him. you two had been through everything together. two boyfriends, three jobs... you're like nothing can repla

so he read the hebrew language and he read law.that time you couldn't get hebrew in the regular college curriculum. and what this tells us is madison was like many young people not sure what he was going to do with his life when he grew up. so he stayed on thinking about becoming a minister and thing about becoming a lawyer. and i traced this out when i was at princeton, and it turns out there were a number of young men who did exactly what madison did, but they only studied hebrew, and every one of them but madison went onto become an ordained minister. so it's clear he's thinking about the ministry as a vocation. and historians are of one mind about this. i'm not forcing the facts at all. and we know in any event he did neither. he kind of became our first career politician instead. even in old age madison was convinced as he says, "belief in god is essential to the moral order of the world. so for him it's kind of the building block for a successful society. so we have ended a few minutes early, and i would be willing and invite

you won't hear someone say, they need to have a second language —— there's no need to have a second languagey own family, a husband is trying to speak german to speak to the family and as soon as they hear his accent he gets spoken to in english. a lot of people speak good english so it is hard for people to go abroad and get to practise their languages. is hard for people to go abroad and get to practise their languagesm is always embarrassing if you ring up is always embarrassing if you ring up to make a reservation, i did that in france where i tried to make a reservation and they replied to me in english. is it as simple as the fa ct in english. is it as simple as the fact that because everybody speaks english around the world we are just lazy? no, i don't think the lazy argument works. we don't start learning early enough. i learnt to languages from birth and that's the easiest time to learn it playfully. but then you have that advantage. yes. if there was more of that i think it would be easier for english people to learn other languages. but we can't all marry a european, so we need t

to you [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] >>sed to speak about us and then seeing fidel next to him made me think, are you for real or do you just have to play this role? my uncle delphine said that's probably not even what he really wants to say. so don't take it to heart. delphine was the person i listened to because that was the person i knew experienced the torturing of cuba when he was in prison. he would say, that's how the government works. they try to destroy the family. they try to keep us apart. so i was fighting for both of their freedom because i was hoping for the day juan miguel could meet with elian here and be free as well. they even paid! wow! yeah. it's nice that every bad decision doesn't have to be permenant! ditch verizon. keep your phone. we'll even pay it off when you switch to america's best unlimited network. my dad called them up and asked for "the jennifer garner card" which is such a dad thing to do. after he gave his name the woman from capital one said "mr. garner, are you related to jennifer?" kind

in the kind of language he will understand.e would like to see results. the pressure campaign, we see that working. the international community is in agreement with the united states and many of our partners and allies on putting additional pressure on north korea. the secretary happens to be coming back. i know you want to obsess over statements and all of that and try to make a lot of noise out of that, bhau ut what is import to ream is at the meeting they put out a strong condemnation of north korea. we're all singing from the same hymn book. >>> a lot of us have respoporten the success from asean meetings and the following days, it doesn't take away from that, but perhaps what has under cut the previous success. >> i don't know if i agree with you on that. >> saying all options on the table, that has been a real aggressive response. is that a new type of policy? using whatever options available to us including -- >> secretary mattis addressed this issue earlier in a strong statement that he issued today. i will read a littl

this is exactly the language leouble uses -- language trumb uses. it is past with the approval of martin van buren, then the president, who was a democrat. is a republican act, the civil rights act of 1966. i say it with your president, a democrat, who signed off on this stuff. he did the same thing with the 13 the moment. the complaint, you are over -- the 13th amendment. to the complaint -- they complained, it was a democrat who basically wrote that. so he was very deft in politics in this way. he is putting it there because he understands how important the army is to making reconstruction happen. because he isir hoping to persuade andrew johnson to sign it. hasohnson feels like he this power as president, there's no real reason to disbelieve him in a conversation with johnson. johnson agrees he would sign it. johnson didn'tt actually read the act, so he doesn't know what he was promising to sign. johnson was actually not much of a reader. [laughter] which, i guess has its disadvantages. [laughter] heard,ay, as we've congress overturns the veto. y

so you have the language, fire and fury, that the president uses. then you have the language that we've heard from both tillerson and from mattis. it's not all entirely on the same page. i don't know if you guys were listening to admiral kirby a second ago on how, essentially, it's been a catch-up situation as this was off the cuff, ben, so can you speak to the issue of not all being on the same page. >> i think the president was being blunt and off the cuff. it was very clear from how he said that that it was off the cuff but i think the tone was -- >> should you be off the cuff on north korea. >> i think the words that people obsessed with him saying are fire and fury are words that, you know what, do you want him to use a different word. his point was to speak directly to kim jong un and to make it very clear that it is a new day, you're not going to get away. >> but he didn't give his administration a heads up on using that kind of language about north korea. >> let me say this. i think that there are multiple ways that you can deal with diploma

that's sort of bellicose language that the north koreans use. but the language on the u.s.matters too. presidential language matters. fire and fury is what this president said. is there a risk here that the united states is not able or doesn't want to back up that kind of language? you have rex tillerson, the secretary of state in the region now really pursuing what has been called peaceful pressure, a very different kind of strategy than what we heard from the president yesterday. >> that's right, christine. the strategy that secretary of state tillerson seems to be p pursuing at this junctionture is one of which we have a way in which to get the north koreans to the table. he's looking at various means to get a country that has been very reluctant to negotiate, and when they do negotiate there's a lot of problems with those negotiations. . but at the very least what the secretary of state is doing is in concert with previous efforts in the region. the kind of rhetoric that you heard yesterday from the president is one that that kind of effort by the secretary of state and

what country could we go to and not know their language and expect them to help us learn their languagend succeed? host: the democratic national committee released a statement yesterday, the chairman said, areald trump and mike pence seeking to deny millions of by familyaging unification. the bill is not just an affront to our values, it is an affront to our economy. studies have shown that punishing immigrant families and curbing immigrants would only stifle america's economic growth and limit our nation's potential. democrats believe diversity is our biggest strength and we will continue to stand with the immigrant communities that enrich our country everyday." we will take you through more reaction, especially from those on capitol hill, that would be needed to move the legislation originally introduced at the beginning of this year, reintroduced after some changes and discussion with the white house by senators david perdue of georgia and tom cotton of arkansas, but republicans in the senate. carol is an independent and west virginia, good morning. guest: good morning. i do not have

the secretary's call was, though, well after the fire and fury language.tor mccain and others, republicans and democrats, have complained that it was, quote, bombastic, in senator feinstein's view, not helpful, said senator mccain that, no other president that he knew of would have used such language. and the implication from all of the critics is that the president's language implied the use of nuclear force. is that the way the secretary read it? and did the secretary have any early warning from his earlier phone call that this was going to happen? or did he only speak to the president in the aftermath. >> he spoke to the president after the fact, after the president made his announcement. you know, as people look at this and some consider comments to have been alarming, i would have to go back to this. let's consider what is alarming. what is alarming to, two icbm tests in less than a month, two nuclear tests that took place last year, as a matter of fact, when there's an earthquake in china, i get many e-mails and calls from all of you asking was it an

whether in a journal or speak it in the slammer use your language to communicate with each other and they want you to feel less than and to create a strong community but using your language and go forth in peas. >> c. charles is one of the least well-known members of

thosee are talk norse to he is using our language, which is not political language, but our language.is blunt, hard. he is in a different position, and every president -- north korea has always been a part of the employee orientation. every time you have a president, you have to go do the north korean thing. he is doing it in a different way, because i think he is seeing a different way of doing it. getting the sanctions agreed upon by three different factions. it was a plus. basically, he is speaking to north korea in a language, their survival as a language. they are bluffing. he is calling their bluff. itit is something -- we are not going to do anything until they doo something. are they going to do g somethin? i think we sit back and be calm about guam. >> dana: and if nothing else we can do. >> kennedy:rl earlier today i was talking with "the wall street journal" and i said, how is the mood there? people have lived with this for a couple decades, so they are not that worried. i think there is multiple levels of communication going on back channels, front channels. you say this,

his language was gendered. language, of course, triggers emotion. frank's contribution to the third edition of explaining is called "reading for emotion," but it is language that gets us to emotion, allows us to uncover it, and without getting into the deep weeds with the other french theorists, frank has made us notice that. finally, like all of the best history, unceasing pressure along with frank's more sophisticated recent work leaves us with questions to ponder. i have often asked him to be more forthcoming about kennan's freudianism. frank takes note of it in the article. frank has said that kennan urged gaddis, his official biographer, to use freudian theory when writing about him. gaddis dlienld. what happens if others take up that? a man who seems to have analyzed himself in freudian terms, even while they reject as most psychologists now do, the key principles of freudianism. as for emotions, how elusive they are. the words with which they are expressed can reveal much about the emotions of the person who wrote or spoke them, but surely th

donald trump is using our language, which not political language but our language, it's blunt, it's hard. he's negotiating. he's in a different position. and i feel like every president has -- north korea has been part of the employee orientation. it's like every time you have a president, oh, you have to go through the north korean thing. get past it. >> set it aside. >> he's doing it in a different way, because i think he's seeing a different way of doing it, i.e., getting the sanctions agreed upon by three different factions, was a plus. and he's speaking to north korea in their survivalist language. they're bluffing. he's calling their bluff. bottom line -- we aren't going to do anything until they do something, so are they going to do something? i think we just sit and -- be calm about guam. >> and there's nothing else we can do. earlier today we talked to "the wall street journal" bureau chief in seoul. i said, what is the mood there? he said, people have lived with this for a couple of decades. they're not really worried. there are back channels, front channel. i had say this. you

incendiary language.es president truman's warning to japan when he announced an atomic bomb had fallen on hiroshima during world war ii. if they do not accept our terms they may expect rain from the air the like of which has never been seen on this earth. but the us secretary of state, who has just arrived in guam, said the president's language was deliberately tough. he is sending a strong message to north korea in language that kim jung un will understand because he does not seem to understand diplomatic language. the president wanted to be clear to the north korean regime that the us has an unquestionable ability to defend itself and its allies and it is important that he delivers that message before any escalation on their part. guam sits right out in the pacific ocean. it is closer to asia and both south and north korea than it is to the us mainland. on tv in guam the threat is portrayed as real, but the people there are calm. i am not nervous, i am confident in our military capability. the first thi

whether in a journal or speak it in the slammer use your language to communicate with each other and they want you to feel less than and to create a strong community but using your language and go forth in peas. >> c. charles is one of the least well-known members of the civil-rights movement everybody needs to understand you cannot talk about civil rights without charles hamilton houston it is a semi biographical coach so oh in history there is a river say the special - - di

he does not seem to understand diplomatic language. president wanted to be clear to the north korean regime that the us has an unquestionable ability to defend itself and its allies and it is important that he delivers that message before any escalation on their part. guam sits right out in their part. guam sits right out in the pacific ocean. it is closer to asia and both south and north korea and it is to the us mainland. on tv in guam the threat is portrayed as real, but the people there are calm. iam not real, but the people there are calm. i am not nervous, i am confident in oui’ i am not nervous, i am confident in our military capability. the first thing that comes to mind immediately is my family, to come up with a plan if anything happens. the stakes do not come higher than nuclear war. even now after north korea's nuclear missiles test, few see that as a risk, but the cost of potential wa rfa re risk, but the cost of potential warfare for the korean peninsula and the region would be high. well, the bellicose language between t

it's like movie language. this is the language of comic books. >> like he's playing a president. >> we have lived in the nuclear age and for the better part of 70 or 80 years. you never had a president who plays with language in this way, in such an indiscriminate, promiscuous way. this is the one area that you have to be very careful that your words are not misinterpreted. a lot of places you can be flagrant and promiscuous in politics. >> nuclear war ain't one of them? >> this is where it's dangerous not to be. i don't know what he's intending to say or actually saying and i think that part of this is he's doing this thing which he says -- he is talking the way action heroes talk, not the way presidents who talk who have the power of life and death in their hands. >> let me include in phil rucker. i think yesterday it seemed like one of the press avails where he wouldn't let you guys go. i have been in these interactions and sometimes, you know, it's the reporters who are trying to wrap them. i'm not suggest

dice's language was filthy.nt to be with you, he's different, very -- i really don't understand why they go here to dice clay. to me it's like, jew going to hitler rally. >> i pulled this beautiful dust pan, with her name engraved, the whole family -- you had to see the look on her face. [ laughter ] >> the guy is a chauvinistic moron, you know, i wouldn't hang out with that guy, not if he meant those things. even as a guy i wouldn't hang out, because then e would say he's the range, you know. as a comedian it's very funny but haert anybody but you and jasmine. >> to be outrageous and bad boy and breaking the rules is extremely lucrative and pandering. there's a lot of comedy that's done underneath the guys of being the edge. it isn't. it's actually connecting with the basis audience. i found through great effort, at least, one remark of his that i couldn't stay on the air. he described the sexual technician, i say to the fish lose the bra or i'll cut you. >> you're asking me to offend -- >> no, i'm asking you i

the secretary's call was well after the fire and fury language. mccain and others, republicans and democrats, have complained that it was bombastic. not helpful says senator mccain. no other president, not eisenhower or reagan would have used such language. the implication from the critics is that the president's language implied the use of nuclear force. is that the way the secretary read it? did the secretary have any early warning from his earlier phone call that this was going to happen? or did he only speak to the president in the aftermath? >> he spoke to the president after the fact, after the president made his announcement. as people look at this and some consider comments to have been alarming, i would have to go back to this. let's consider what is alarming. what is alarming two icbm tests in less than a month, two nuclear tests that took place last year. as a matter of fact, when there's an earthquake in china, i get e-mails and calls from you asking was it another nuclear test. that is how big of a deal this is, what is going on. let

what's disturbing is language like locked and loaded is not dit mattic language. it may mean something to the north koreans but what does it mean to our allies, the south koreans and japan. they don't know how to interpret this. and part of the problem with trump using this bombastic language is it can cause a miscalculation, a mistake. usually the language comes to the nsc, it's worked through the state department and everybody else, it's sent out to the hall allies so everybody knows what it means. here nobody knows what it means. >> we have an republican interpreter in the house today. i want to share more of what president trump said and maybe you can dissect it. >> we are preparing for many different alternative events. new york has disrespected our country greatly. he's said things that are horrific and with me he's not getting away with it. >> how do you interpret that, with me he's not getting away with that. there's no diplomacy here. and many trump supporters would say who needs diplomats. >> i'm going to try to thread a needle. the positive here is i th

his language absolutely mirrored back their language and it is not appropriate for the united states.e are the number one super power. the strongest economic, political power in the world. we don't need to brag. it just makes us look weak, actually, when we sound like north korea. >> let me ask you, what can the president do, what will he do if he's played this statement yesterday. you're saying this is par for the course for them. but he put a marker down yesterday. north korea said this twice. if this is what they keep up now. is donald trump going to ignore this? should he just ignore this? what is the appropriate reaction going forward, given what he said yesterday? >> i think he needs to ignore the rhetoric. because the north koreans, as i said before, there is what they do. they're afraid that we'll take some action. 37 to prove that they're taller than they are. the reality is that donald trump needs to articulate to the american people, to our allies, to china, russia, and then of course, north korea, a strategy. and they have the pieces in the making if they could bring them

] [ speaking foreign language ] [ speaking foreign language ] >> of course you know that for me and everyone they need help. >> thank you for highlighting the fact there are large populations in syria as well and we sought refuj outside the realm as well. would you be able to respond to the question about what's being done? >> we are taking actions on fronts. you know, the over a shing question is what drove iraqis to support isis? the respect for human rights, other complicating factors. i think right now we have a very good partner with the prime minister of iraq who is committed to an agenda that is inclusive. to make sure they have a voice and a role in their government. we have seen with iraqi security forces and their battle against isis to ensure that in liberating areas they are not destroying the communities so they can have confidence. how do we say no, this is not the right day. you can see the perspectives amplified. we can't them. but we want a framework for it to occur. we are committed to continues to partner with our friends to help ensure not only for minorities tha

the language in this case might meet the threat. the people i talk to you here in washington are nervous about what's going on and the united states -- this didn't begin with donald trump. the united states has historically been unable, not unable, but george bush tried it, barack obama try to, bill clinton tried it, this is a thorny situation is not new to the american president. >> jon: one reason kim jong-un is such a mystery is because what he seems to know how he's going to behave or react and perhaps, and using north korean like language, the president is trying to make himself as much as a cipher, keep the north koreans wondering what's going through his mind. >> i think that's probably right, it's a little different than the former cia report from "the washington post" tweeted, it's a little different because the united states has more than 1,000 nuclear warheads and they use more tempered language, but what rex tillerson was trying to say is this is your mailing which he understands, nothing else has worked so far and this

i think they would have preferred much more measured language. i think there is also a time and a place. sometimes language like the president used yesterday is very appropriate. but it is usually done when there is a situation that has actually happened or we know is about to happen. at this juncture for the president to use the type of rhetoric that he used and the idea of fire, the idea of using all means of national power against north korea, all of that is certainly true if the event of hostilities but it is perhaps an unnecessary reminder at this juncture that that would be the consequence of any type of action that the north koreans would engage in, were it to be a hostile action, especially against the mainland u.s. or u.s. territories like guam. >> we appreciate your expertise. >>> a lot ahead. the words of the president, "like the world has never seen." that was the phrase used yesterday regarding north korea. as we've seen it is a repeated phrase he uses often in different situations as well. >>> and blame it on bannon? a "wall street

and fury language might not have been tough enough. he thanked vladimir putin for expelling diplomats from the american embassy in russia and said to check back with him on whether mitch mcconnell, the top republican, should stay or go. "the 11th hour" begins now. we have made it to thursday. good evening once again from here in new york. day 203 of the trump administration was wide ranging. it started out with great stress over the tensions with north korea, including this new talk of war, and the day is ending that same way, but along the way, during the afternoon the stress over any possible conflict on the korean peninsula was interrupted by a thrill ride. as the president making two rare on camera appearances for his working vacation, decided to take questions from reporters at his golf resort in new jersey. he proceeded to take reporters on a tour of his mand and his world from manafort to mueller to mcmaster to mcconnell to the middle east to michigan. the latter as he relitigated his victory over hillary. from putin to transgen

well it was cool to speak the language that is superficial and donald trump one thing many things and he almost certainly is well you also if he's authentic proximate fish to him i like to member why he started. saying well.

the statement does not do so. >> i would oppose the amended language. first of all, i feel it is covered in the fourth paragraph where it says we urge authorities to use our resources to investigate other apparent crimes including federal, state, hate crimes that were committed. second of all i feel very strongly there is a lack of moral equivalency. i have a problem because i feel that somehow is excusing the people who caused the violence to begin with. i lack evidence that there were significant numbers of counterdemonstrators who were in fact as violent as those who were inciting the violence to begin with. >> this is an important moment for the nation and for this commission. i welcome the careful thought and thinking of all of the commissioners, many of whom have given input into this statement that we are trying to negotiate to assure that for the full extent possible speak with a unified voice at a time when it seems circumstances in the country could reasonably have the expectation the united states commission on civil rights to the fullest ext

and language has become more important, hasn't it?ast here we are sitting in a bbc studio, the 24 hour news cycle gets people, obviously, hooked on hearing more information, talking about more information. the difference between being informed and being well—informed is fundamentally important, and that is why we work with commercial brands such as the times, who believe very firmly in a difference between informed and well—informed. difference between informed and well-informed. you started the company six years ago, you described to me earlier that you had an epiphany ina to me earlier that you had an epiphany in a trench — explain. to me earlier that you had an epiphany in a trench - explain. yes, in afghanistan, we were having to power down at the bottom of a trench because of a situation going on around us, and as we were talking at the bottom of the trench, a group of soldiers and myself, we saw a little blue triangle on the floor, and it was only later that we worked out that they were arrowheads from alexander the great. funda

they are using language ina way programme.ake sense to us in a way that doesn't make sense to us but they are emphasising and repeating things again and again. the point is, those two robots, not physical things, an ice cream, they would have understood what they were saying to each other. —— on a screen. as much as they understand anything. they are simply passing information back and forth to try to come to a conclusion. ai experimenting with language and passing information between themselves all the time. it sounds like they are plotting against us and want to elude human detection that they are just trying to find effective ways of exchanging information. so this is all about the development of artificial intelligence. it seems like it's got a long way to go but are people saying it is actually getting somewhere? it is very exciting. it isa somewhere? it is very exciting. it is a huge area of research and is starting to touch technologies that we use every day. that is why there isa we use every day. that is why there is