larry jani. let's expand what you mentioned and talk about it. considering the record of his highness in human rights and international law, let's look at this aspect of the attack on israel and the response of the islamic republic of iran . how is the action of the islamic republic of iran defined according to international law? first, when a country violates the interests of another country , it is aggression. it is the responsibility of the united nations to take a stand against this aggression and even take practical action. we saw in the case of the aggression of the saddam regime that this was never done . we cannot expect anything from this imamzadeh of yours . there is no healing, the inalienable right of every country it is a member of the united nations, which can have a legitimate defense for its own interests. by the way, our answer is our answer. it was defensive, although it appeared to be aggressive, we didn't do it first, if we had done it first , it would have been an attack, this response was completely defensive. all the so-cal

larry jani, before the military discussion, there are three discussions let's expand on the four veryortant issues that you raised between your talks and talk about them in more detail , considering the record of his highness in human rights and international law, let's address this aspect of the attack on israel and the response of the islamic republic of iran, which according to the international law of action of the islamic republic of iran how is it defined? now, in the perspective of legitimate defense with the aim of punishing the aggressor, first of all, when a country violates the interests of another country, it is an open military aggression. it is the responsibility of the united nations to take a stand against this aggression and even take practical action. we are talking about the aggression of the saddam regime. we saw that this never happened. it is the indisputable right of every un member country to have a legitimate defense for its own interests. by the way, our response was a defensive response , although it appeared to be aggressive. we did not do this first. the s