. >> that was the theory defense attorneys roger sinnenberg, larry whitney and donna coletta took topreparing for denny's trial number two was a daunting task. >> it turned out to be a 13-year investigation, so there was an awful lot of data. >> they insist denny was innocent. following the fallout by the akron p.d. and the failure to find hannah's car. >> once they dpound the bag outside the window, the case turned from an investigation in the death of hannah hill into an investigation of denny ross. >> denny's lawyers told the jurors about altogether things police had failed to do, like check hannah's pager records or do a luminol check of denny's place. they questioned how denny could kill hannah in his apartment and left no trace of the murder? >> no blood, no excrement, nothing that belonged to hannah hill, and yet that's where they say she was murdered. >> as for the so-called new blood evidence, denny's attorneys told jurors those spots were so tiny, they didn't prove anything. and also challenged the notion that bleeding necessarily proved a violent encounter. >> we all get p