in fact lason is materially strengthened in the p5-plus-1 vienna alg agreement. one important area of that strengthening is that iran will not engage in several activities that could contribute to the development of a nuclear explosive devices. these commitments are indefinite. in addition iran will not pursue plutonium or uranium for 15 years. weaponization requirements especially for missile launch add to the breakout time lyon -- line. i cannot agree it does not dismantle iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon. the iaea will be permitted to use advanced technologies technologies that due national laboratories have in fact developed. much has been made about a 24-day process for ensuring inspectors getting access to undeclared sites. in fact the iaea can request access to any suspicious location with 24-hour notice. the jcpoa goes beyond that baseline recognizing that disputes could arise, and provides a crucial new tool for resolving such disputes within a reasonable amount of time. again, this is the first time that there actually is a cut off in time. bu

first of all i just might point out there were many statements made before lason, before vienna -- >> this was made july 21st. >> yes, but you can check them against the agreement. they don't square up. those statements were very clear. first of all, the aim is not to go to military sites, and by the way it's not us it's iaea of course. the aim is to go to where -- is there suspicion of nuclear relevant activities. if they are on a military site doesn't matter. there is still the iaea access to those sites. >> i only have a few seconds left but i would hope that you would reconcile those statements for the public. >> we cannot control their statements. >> you stated the 24-day waiting period won't allow the regime to conceal any illegal activity. but as i read the agreement and many other have point t out the inspector's request to visit those sites could be delayed much longer than 24 days. i know you are not concerned about the 24-day period you believe that the iaea would be able to handle that but if you -- if you look at different parts in section q of annex 1 of the agreement, i

first of all i just might point out there were many statements made before lason, before vienna -- >> this was made july 21st. >> yes, but you can check them against the agreement.