and whether it is bipartisan consensus that had been there in the us system is now just gone. latasha allen was talking earlier about how china will not be interested or china doesn't have the appetite to kind of all the kinds of programs that the us a id funding gap will leave. it's a huge gap. but given that, you know, they work on things that will affect countries beyond the board. as with the aid, as distribution, things like preventing organized crime, terrorism conflicts, and the impact that, that will have on human security. are they any of the countries that we can expect maybe european nations, for example, to try and fill some of this gap? that's a good question. i mean, uh, traditionally the scandinavian countries in particular have big have been big donors. of course they've donated quite a bit in terms of a percentage of, of g p, a and they're often above the point 7 percent, that the countries are supposed to spend on foreign aid. but it is hard to sell the scott because the u. s. was the biggest owner, even though the u. s. was far below what the expectations were in terms of