made i mean up there latif the president of c.t.c. set up a televised contest together with the sudanese young businessman's association and the british council hope that a lot of that if you bobbie i'm sure you know within that the whole concept of entrepreneurship at that time was not a known concept and was not one that was a tall encourage so culturally. being entrepreneurial is not part of the sudanese culture no mother you know would tell her son or daughter all daughter i want you to go and start the for a company and fail to never it's like study be a doctor be a lawyer be an engineer if you friend you know all these all day what can we do then maybe you can go and start. at the beginning it wasn't clear if anybody would be interested in a show like mash arroyo. but really from missouri one it was amazing to us not only what about but 5000 participants 55000 applicants in missouri one but then the engagement once it started to go live on t.v. and also she'll need. you know every one from that person's area or region would be w

soleimani was a heartless murderous terrorist who deserves to rot in hell with bin laden and abd al-latifo they have to qualify that trump is too dumb to be making such big and dangerous moves. booty judge had pretty much the same points but his words have more weights because he was a navy man and understands the price of battle. elizabeth warren's plane jones hair in her analysis boils down to gets us off impeachment therefore a stale tale of wag the dog. she's like ma'am on people used to tell me. the real question for these wannabes is how serious and specific this the sweat have to be to qualify is eminent, and what would cause you as president to act? we all know vacuums make problems especially in the middle east, so how do you as commander guaranty ironic does not become the latest? so far bernie gets the most points for consistency, but he has to show his work and sometimes messy ideologies collide to make even bigger quagmires. they are all not ready for primetime players who have yet to fully explain how, short of blaming the president, they would clean up this latest mess. and

president's wrongdoing continues to have any weight whether the impeachment power itself is now in the latif. >> manager. >> mr. chief justice. >> senator from florida. >> i send a question to the desk on behalf of myself and senators capito and senator of south carolina with all due respect. >> thank you. >> the question from senators rubio, o-uppercase-letter and scott and scott of south carolina is directed to both parties and we begin with the council for the house managers. the question reads if i understand the managers case the president abused his power because he acted contrary to the advice of his advisors but he is guilty of obstruction of congress because he acted in accordance to the advice of his advisors. >> that is not our argument at all. the president has impeached in article one not because he acted contrary to the advice of his advisors. that is a red herring offered by the president's legal team. we are not saying that the president is not afraid to disregard the advice of his counsel. he is, he is entitled to disregard even really good advice. what he is not free to do

president's wrongdoing continues to have any weight whether the impeachment power itself is now in the latif >> manager. >> mr. chief justice. >> senator from florida. >> i send a question to the desk on behalf of myself and senators capito and senator of south carolina with all due respect. >> thank you. >> the question from senators rubio, o-uppercase-letter and scott and scott of south carolina is directed to both parties and we begin with the council for the house managers. the question reads if i understand the managers case the president abused his power because he acted contrary to the advice of his advisors but he is guilty of obstruction of congress because he acted in accordance to the advice of his advisors. >> that is not our argument at all. the president has impeached in article one not because he acted contrary to the advice of his advisors. that is a red herring offered by the president's legal team. we are not saying that the president is not afraid to disregard the advice of his counsel. he is, he is entitled to disregard even really good advice. what he is not free to do i