i shouldn't. human rights laura don kala told me that not imposing a no fly zone is better than imposing. they ultimately decided not to impose a no flies on which by the way, i agree they should not do that. when we look at that, for example, libya when that was imposed, it became much more of a conflict in the course of destroyed libya. so no fly zones are very serious affairs. indeed, at the same time, i can understand zalinski frustration because look, may tell the us, kind of a, you know, prodded ukraine in more provocative acts against russia. and then once russia invaded nato pretty much stood aside and watched it all happened. so from his point of view, i could see that he would feel betrayed. yeah, that language that he used seeing those at the meeting in nato, a blood on their hands. do you think, though he really expected some sort of action to follow through on nuts, at desire for a no fly? so i do. i think, i think, to lensky, if he, if he had not been under the impression that nato would back him up from the beginning, my guess is he might have taken a different stance towa