that yet it is a story of a woman in the 1970's and what intrigues me besides the story is that laura miller talks about of the authority and the boys in the book is intriguing but also rattling male reviewers who are not used to a woman to take the liberties she takes in the block and i cannot wait to see what that means and what liberties do we not take? and i am getting ready to read fear itself intellectual and political history of the new deal and also woven in with the coming and the prosecution of world war ii with said domestic and international together the way most scholars cannot do. and also treating the unraveling of the new deal back to its roots when it excluded african-americans into can search and legislation and passed so then right and things you can get into a coalition but then could take them apart. . .

what intrigues me about it besides the story is that laura miller on salon talk about how rachel kushner'sauthority and the book is really intriguing, but also rattling ice on reviewers who are used to a woman taken the liberty she takes in the book. i can't wait to see what that really means. and finally, i'm also getting around to ira katz nelson, fear itself. it's a big book. schlepping it to the beach will be fun, but it's intellectual and political history of the new deal also both in name but come in and of world war ii, tying the domestic and international together in a way that most scholars tend not to and also tracing the unraveling of the new deal back to its roots when it excluded african-americans in order to get certain legislation passed, which set the conflict in the 60s and 70s when african-americans were long overdue to get the rights, to get things they didn't get from the new deal and the new deal coalition fell apart. that's an important book now that we have people trying to take apart the new deal coalition for good. >> the more i got to look into his message, the mo

lora in l.a., you're on "the stephanie miller show." hi lauraint, you guys. this whole nsa subcontracting thing is a big boondoggle. they're just taking money and moving it. >> stephanie: what do you mean? >> caller: well, it costs us billions and what are we getting for it? what do we really know? these guys don't have any loyalty to the government. they only have loyalty to an employer. >> stephanie: right. we've said that repeatedly on the show, laura. we think the private contracting thing is a large -- >> that's what they should investigate. really get rid of all of the subcontracting. >> stephanie: laura when they say -- because people have said that's because that's where the technology is. okay. maybe it is time to rethink things as a government. why do we not have money to build infrastructure or technology or whatever. so we're going to subcontract out our national security? >> caller: it's crazy. plus, i love you guys. >> stephanie: i love you back. thank you. the president talking about the nsa. >> obama: i'm not sure if you can char