if it's still so important, i suppose lauren anderson ran away and there's enough for a cause about his escaping from india. second, that settlement brought about a $100.00 to each person, which was nothing. to cover the cost difference enough to cover the la supply. you talked about union carbide having the more my dow, but douses then has furnished with dupont and you pond and now have a beautiful name today called taber. so you'll never recognize and connected to union carbide. new research is showing how union carbide, which pretends to have existed, india actually heaps existing to shell companies. so the amazing investigative journalist pulling up the whole pile case and sadly every year, 2nd and 3rd of december in ohio, they are march is against the continued crime against mobile. ready the continued injustice there was no justice delivered by her by till date. but we invite the chief executive of court aver i any representative from these are newly changed named companies with relationships to the bobo disaster, which they deny. and of course, they deny any connection. it's the

. >> yes, potentially, anderson, but lauren boebert voted yes for jim jordan and maybe she was skeptical for mccarthy, and not explicitly voting for mccarthy, and she told me that last night she was not explicitly going to vote for mccarthy, and they were not going vote andy biggs, but somebody they aligned with ideologically, but jim jordan said he has no want to be a candidate, and if he did, he, too, would fall short of the 218 vote, and that is if mccarthy cannot get there to 218, who can? steve scalise would also fall short, and so the same group that mccarthy cut with the hard-line members would fall short of the member, and those who don't like those concessions said they would not support that with any other speaker candidate with all kinds of speaker problems here. >> and melissa, does the former president trump, does he have a role to play here? >> well, he is a major fact in that -- think of this, and some of the rations that donald trump weighed into, the ten house republicans that decided to vote for his impeachment, he made sure every one of them lost. i am wishing that jam

people like lauren boebert have said, anderson, they don't want anybody in house leadership that includesteve scalise. >> the difference between the new york makeup room and the d.c. makeup room, there is no pool. who knows. by tomorrow there may be. >> the new york has windows. >> that's true too. >> wait, you wear makeup? >> we'll check back in with you guys shortly. let's continue the conversation, david. to the question that jake raised, is there something -- how do those five or the holdouts get -- >> since noon this afternoon, i've been saying the same thing, right? >> it's a whole new audience. don't worry about it. no one will know. >> say it in french. >> those five or six are never going to come along. i think the best you're going to hope for is you get folks to vote president. you close the doors and the caucus, and the pressure of your fellow republicans, they say listen, you don't have to be for us. just don't be against us. you can claim you didn't vote for kevin, and he gets elected with a reduced margin. but with still enough. and he gets to be speaker. i don't think you'

lauren fox, thank you very much. a lot can happen in the next 24 hours or so. >>> joining me to discuss is christian soltice anderson we pick up where lauren left off, talking about the multiple ballots, representative bob good, who was a hard no against mccarthy, he said there will be a new speaker candidate set to emerge in the second ballot tomorrow. given everything we've seen and mccarthy has given up at this point, if it's not kevin mccarthy, who is the next speaker? >> the fact that there's not an easy answer to that question is one of the things that is making it most likely that kevin mccarthy will ultimately prevail at this point. there's not a concerted challenge being organized against him that has a real credible figurehead leading is. right now, even though there's a lot of talk about, you know, who folks don't want to vote for, there's not a lot of clarity on who would be that next person to step up. the other problem that folks are sort of grappling with is leaders normally have a lot of things they can use as incentives to try to bring people along. things like the ability to fundraise more in their

it's a real problem, anderson and, yes, this is certainly a lot worse than a lot of allies were predicting. >> yeah, lauren, we'll check back in with you, congressman dent, just logistically once they get through the alphabet do they take a break? is there time for kibitzing. >> we haven't done this for 100 year. >> time for crying in the cloakroom. >> the chief clerk is the presiding officer. if it were a republican speaker they'd say we'll recess to the call of the chair and would have a beatdown session to break some arms. they can't do that. they would have to have a vote to recess and the democrats aren't going to recess so i suspect they'll have to continue voting unless the chief clerk decides that she wants to call a recess. i don't see how they stop. >> it was reported that mccarthy wanted to keep them on the floor out of fear that if they got off the floor, that other arrangements might be made. >> uh-huh. >> so it's not at all clear. what's very clear is nobody really knows what to do right now. >> donald trump could make a difference here? he has come out for kevin mccarthy but not in such a fl