"wall street journal" lauren weber wrote all about it. y that advices companies on the test. lauren, some questions seem very indirect yet their answer, really could make-or-break a job applicant's chances right? >> they're indirect on purpose. the original personality test, these have been used in the work place for hiring purposes for a few decades. the questions used to be fairly straightforward. now they're a lot more oblique. they kind of get at information in a much more round about way but that is so people can't really cheat on the test or guess what the right answer might be. david: charles, i have to ask you, i will say what one of the questions is, i dislike yelling but sometimes a little yell something necessary, that is one of the questions. if i getted a vans copies, somehow, which i'm sure a lot of companies will be able to do breaking into some system somewhere, can i cheat? could i answer a question like this maybe not the way i was planning to but with the right answer because i know what the right answer is? >> it is act